It has been argued that Act three is the dramatic climax of The Crucible(TM). Discuss how far you agree with this argument.(TM)

Authors Avatar
H/W 21/02/2007

'It has been argued that Act three is the dramatic climax of 'The Crucible'. Discuss how far you agree with this argument.'

In my opinion Act three is then dramatic climax of 'The Crucible' but Act four also includes some very dramatic moments so could be considered as another dramatic climax to the play. In this essay I shall tell you why Act three is the dramatic climax and will also talk about why other acts build the tension up towards this climax. Miller uses allegory as he makes the audience think that he is only writing about 1692 Salem but he is also writing about, although not referring to the 1940s McCarthyism. In Acts one and two Miller creates dramatic tension and suspends the audience. Miller tries to give his views on witchcraft through John Proctor, as Proctor has very strong views on this subject. He tries to say that he believes there is no such thing as witchcraft and hates communism. The Acts in 'The Crucible' follow a four part dramatic structure founded by a man called Gustav Freytag. The four parts are: exposition, Rising action, climax (turning point) and the falling action. These are split over the four acts and in each of the acts I will show you how these work with that particular act.

In Act one Miller sets the scene and introduces the main characters and their personalities. This Act is known as the exposition. This means that all the background information that is required to understand the story properly is provided. In Puritan Salem, young women like Abigail and Mary have little say in what happens until they are married. Mary has to obey proctor otherwise can be restricted to his home and whipped for disobedience. The protagonist, John Proctor is presented as a quick-witted, sharp-tongued man who is fiercely independent. These characteristics would seem to make him a good person to question the purpose of those who cry witchcraft. However, his guilt over his affair with Abigail puts him in a difficult position because he is guilty of the very hypocrisy that he detests in others. This shows a strong first impression, as the audience understands that the protagonist of the play is a strong, confident character. We find out about Proctor's affair with Abigail which builds up the tension towards the inciting moment of the Act. At the beginning of the Act it is extremely quiet with Reverend Parris, mourning over his daughter, Betty's illness which she has not woken from we suspect that this is quite a loud scene with lots of shouting but in contrast to the last scene when Tituba is interrogated and the inciting moment occurs, this is not as dramatic. The inciting moment in the exposition (Act 1) is when right at the end Abigail starts to confess 'I want to open myself! I want the light of god, I want the sweet love of Jesus' she then begins to confess' I saw Sarah Good with the devil! I saw Goody Osburne with the devil! I saw Bridget Bishop with the devil!' this was the inciting moment that changed the whole play. If this did not happen then the play would not have happened and would have been pointless.
Join now!


In Act two we now move on to the rising action. The basic conflict of the false accusations in Proctors eyes, between him and Abigail becomes complicated as secondary conflicts interfere, including obstacles which frustrate Proctor's attempt to reach his goal of proving Abigail wrong about the witch hunt. One of these secondary conflicts are, Proctor's troubles with Elizabeth, when she is taken away as she has been accused of witchcraft by Abigail. There is lots of suspicion at the beginning of the act as there is a sense tat Abigail is in the room. Elizabeth begins to ...

This is a preview of the whole essay