In what sense is the UKs Parliamentary System said to be undemocratic?

Authors Avatar
In what sense is the UK s Parliamentary System said to be undemocratic?

Over the years some people have argued that Britains Parliamentary system in places is undemocratic. The arguments lie in the Elective system and Parliament.

The most argued issue has been our "First Past the post" voting system. The FPTP questions the whole issue of democratic elections in that the majority will of the people within one constituency may be reflected in the electoral outcome. Of the Candidates standing in a given constituency, the one who receives the highest number of votes is elected. The system works fine when there are only two parties, but it becomes undemocratic as soon as you introduce a third candidate but in practice in the vast majority of constituencies there will be more than two parties standing as candidates. The FPTP has discriminated against the parliamentary power of the third party, which today are the Liberal democrats. The Tories and Labour have benefited from this system time and again, Margaret Thatcher was repeatedly elected in this way. At the 1983 election labour one 148 seats with 26.94% of the vote a where a group if parties that all together gained 26.36% they received 13 seats between them. This again happened in the 1997 election, the Liberal Democrats (the third Party) gained 16.8% of the vote but only got 46 seats. The Tories gained 4 % more (30.7%) of the vote but gained 165 seats. Labour won 43.4% of the votes and gained 419 sears. At a proportionate level, the liberal Democrats should have got around 106 seats in Westminster if their representation was based on similar support for the labour party. This undemocratic problem could be solved by proportional representation, but this also has many down sides.. The electoral system is also considered undemocratic that in one sense a vote in one constituency can mean more than a vote in another. Critic's point out that what decides general elections happens in a small number of marginal constituencies. Usually, around 500 seats are "safe" seats in these seats, the result is almost a foregone conclusion. The winning party gains more votes than it needs to win. Votes for other parties count for little. In marginal seats every vote is important. The results in marginal s determine the complexion of the government.
Join now!


In Britain we have a fusion of powers unlike the Americans who have a separation of powers. This means that the Prime minister and the House of commons are directly linked and the commons holds the majority of the Prime minister s party. It makes the British system far more centralised. In America they are different institutions and can be controlled by different parties. Our system of Fusion of Powers has been described by many as an undemocratic system, especially by Lord Hailsham. Lord Hailsham referred to this system as an elective dictatorship. This means that a powerful ...

This is a preview of the whole essay