The variations in educational performance between different social groups

Authors Avatar
Many sociological studies have been carried out in an attempt to explain the variations in educational performance between different social groups. From these studies, great emphasis has been placed upon certain factors such as social class, gender and ethnicity with relation to educational attainment. Sociologists agree that these facts, being your background, what sex you are (male or female) and what ethnic group you belong to, all impact greatly in the success rate of an individuals educational attainment.

When social class is investigated in relation to educational attainment, research carried out by sociologist King (1) (1970) reveals that a child's educational success is related closely to their home background and the social class group to that of the parents. Most socialists would agree with King in the view that the higher a child's parents are in the social class structure the greater that child's chances of educational success. Therefore it is assumed that the children of working class parents do not accomplish as much academically as the children of middle class parents. Socioglists suggest a variety of reasons for the relative educational "failure" of the working class. These reasons are the influence of the home, the neigbourhood/peer group, and the influence of the school. Along side these explanations is also the issue of intelligence/IQ. Psychologist H Eysenck (1971) would argue that the reason for the difference in educational attainment is that of innate intelligence, the fact that individuals inherit their intelligence/IQ from their parents in much the same way that a person would inherit their facial expressions. Eysneck states "what children take out of schools is proportional to what they bring into the schools in terms of IO."(2). Other sociologists would disagree and argue, what is deemed intelligent varies from society to society, IQ scores vary over time and can improve with practice, and also that IQ tests are biased in favour of the middle class as these tests are largely conducted and carried out by members of the middle class group. Therefore IQ tests only measure the ability of the individual who is being tested to conform to the testers personal idea of intelligence. Most sociologists would largely agree that although we inherit a degree of mental intelligence from our parents, our culture and upbringing determine most of our intelligence.

When looking at the role of the home in relation to educational attainment sociologists examine the values and behaviour of the parents, the form of language used in the home and the physical condition of the home. Douglas (3) (1964) places particular emphasis on the parent's attitude - how much value and the degree of interest showed towards their child's education. Douglas argues that the lack of interest or failure to encourage by parents is significant factors in poor educational performance of their child. From his conclusions, Douglas stated that that during primary socialization, middle-class children received greater attention and stimulus from their parents and that this " formed the basis for high achievement in the educational system". The National Children's Bureau (4) carried out a study based on a nationwide survey of children born in a particular week of March 1946. They monitored this particular group of children and followed their progress through out their entire school days. Just like Douglas it was concluded that middle class parents appeared to show more interest in their children's education than what working class parents did. Further investigations suggest that the reasons behind this division in interest shown by the classes are that middle class parents are more aware of the importance of education. Also that they are usually in a better position to encourage and advise as they are well educated themselves and can offer assistance in homework etc. Some sociologists link this directly to the reason why the middle class children achieve more academically. However these views are strongly criticized by sociologists Tessa Blackstone and Jo Mortimore (5) (1994). They argue that working class parents are not nessarily less interested in their children's education. Blackstone and Mortimore make the following points, working class parents have less time than middle-class parents to attend to school matters because of the demands of their jobs. Working class parents can be put off going to the school because of the way teachers interact with them. Some sociologists argue that if the points made by Douglas, Blackstone and Mortimore are all taken into account, then it may be true (although it is far from being established) that there are clear variations in the attitudes and behavior between the middle classes and working classes, and that this in turn has a lasting effect upon educational attainment. However Howard Becker(6) (1971) has challenged this, his main point is that behavior can change radically depending on the situation. He states "that human action is not simply an expression of fixed patterns established during childhood" therefore parental values are not the reasons for differences in attainment between the social classes. Some sociologists criticize Becker for failing to explore what are the reasons for differential education attainment. Basil Bernstein(7) (1971) looks at speech patterns in relation to social class differences and how this can impact upon educational attainment. He points out "in order to benefit from an academic education, a wider vocabulary and an ability to communicate clearly and cogently are crucial." Bernstein argues that parents pass on vocabulary and ability with language to their children. The more clearly parents reply to children's questions and explain things to them, the better the children will be in their use of language. Berstein distinguishes between two codes of speech; elaborated and restricted (8). From his study he concluded that elaborated speech is most often found to be practiced in middle class homes; a wide vocabulary is used with the child and he/she is encouraged to fully explore
Join now!


his/her language potential. Restricted speech is most often found in working class homes; this is where the child is spoken to with a narrow range of vocabulary. Berstein found that the result is that middle class children are more likely to be adept at language when they begin to attend school or as Bourdieu (markiest in outlook) quotes "(9) they possess the code of the message" and that this gives them a great advantage over working class children when it comes to speaking or writing. Sociologists such as Wedge and Prosser (10) (1958) looks at other areas with ...

This is a preview of the whole essay