The dagger of the mind - “An appreciation of how a written Shakespeare text has been realised or represented in a different medium.”

Authors Avatar
The dagger of the mind

"An appreciation of how a written Shakespeare text has been realised or represented in a different medium."

The principal of William Shakespear's writings was for dramatical and theatrical interpretation of his words on paper. Through time they have been altered and manipulated to suit the time-period they are projected in. For instance 18th century clothing worn in 18th century productions, Joe Macbeth, following Shakespear's play closeley but using the conventions of a gangster movie and From a Jack to a King, a 1992 rock musical adaptation of Macbeth. There is no right or wrong way to interpret Macbeth musically, through paintings, speech (radio) and, the media I have looked at- film.

I viewed two versions of Macbeth made by obviously different dispositioned directors, utilising different materials and resources at their disposal. The first interpretation is Roman Polanski's 1971 film. He was assisted in screenplay by Kenneth Tylean, and his leading characters- Jan Finan as Macbeth and Francesca Annis as Lady Macbeth. The second motion picture transaction was the BBC's 1988 production. Directed by Jack Gold, with Macbeth being played by Nicol Williamson and Jane Capotaire playing Lady Macbeth.
Join now!


The scene I have chosen to contrast and compare between the sources is Act 2 Scene I, a much argued and debated scene over the years. The reason that it so controversial is that no one knows what way Shakespeare did that scene, and also- how would he have done it if he had the resources and technology at his disposal nowadays. The part of the scene in question is that Macbeth, just before he goes to kill Duncan, hallucinates, thinking he is seeing a blood-stained dagger, as he moves to kill Duncan evil thoughts enter his mind. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay