• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Before deciding whether science is the best route to truth, the truth that science can offer has to be examined.

Extracts from this document...


This claim can only be assessed after the definition of key words in it have been decide, and realising that what we are debating is that whether science is the best route to truth and not the only route. The science referred to here is the natural sciences, which are based on observation, research and experimentation. Science is based on inductive proof, therefore it cannot be absolute, and this raises a few problems such as can something that is not certain can lead to truth, which is certain. The truth in discussion is the correspondent theory of truth, which is that absolute truth is out there; we just have not discovered it or have reached it yet. However scientific theories arise from them been verified and accepted by the scientific community so they are therefore coherent in truth. The other route to truth that is an option for discussion here is The Arts. These can also possibly lead to truth but they may not be the best route. Within the topic best refers to the most efficient, easiest and fastest route to truth. Before deciding whether science is the best route to truth, the truth that science can offer has to be examined. As stated before science is inductive and based on the probability of a certain event occurring. ...read more.


The only reason that mathematics has this type of truth is that it is based on axioms and once they are assumed correct then the rest of maths follows. Can science & art, which currently have no axioms, have corespondent truths? It would appear that it does not because if scientific logic it traced back to it root these root can be debated. However if it was agreed that the big bang theory was what started the universe and before that there was nothing and this was made into an axiom then it would be possible to obtain corespondent truth in science. If a math axiom was that 1+1=11 then we would have different truths in maths but they still would be corespondent truths. So because science cannot give us corespondent truths then it is not the type of truth that we are looking for. The route to truth that science or art can offer will then have to be one that leads to a pragmatic of coherent truth and not a corespondent truth. If axioms are what is needed to obtain corespondent truth them we could eventually agree on theories of the universe and receive our truth then. However axioms only produce certainty and this certainty does not guarantee truth. ...read more.


Another important point with art is that many times the person viewing/experiencing the art is often unaware of the truth that it may be conveying to them, to them it is just an aesthetic pleasure. Art is dependent on the person viewing it to deliver us truth so it would seem that this may not be the best route for this reason, also because the definition of what is art is so loosely based it is hard to analyses everything that we could call art and that many pieces of art are extremely similar. The claim that science is the best route to truth does not have a definite answer, but from the above discussion an answer can be put forward. Both science and art can lead to the same types of truth and both science and art may be incorrect in this truth that they present. I believe that out of the two options science is the best route because it is more direct and the finding present by one person would be similar to the finding of another person doing the same experiment. Two artists could both present the same paly but there would be two distinct versions of the play. Science is the best route to truth because of its direct nature and it ability to be accepted in more places by more people than a piece of art would. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Art & Design section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Art & Design essays

  1. Free essay

    Art History & Philosophy 1) In a democracy, ought members of a persistent ...

    bound by the Athenian conventions which have led him to this point. He has made his choice. Rather than continue to break the law and teach as he wishes or go into exile, he would rather die. He would rather die than betray his own beliefs and teaching methods.

  2. An Except from The Decay of Lying by Oscar Wilde discussion

    Although art will never be the accurate way to express perception it is the closest to perfection in the sense that in is the one of the few basis that we as humans have to express ourselves. Perfection can never be achieved for obvious reasons including the imperfection of humans

  1. A discussion on Sandro Botticelli.

    Botticelli was most influenced by his master Lippi, who taught him the techniques of panel painting and fresco and control over linear perspective. From Lippi he also acquired a fancifulness in costuming, linear sense of form, and partiality to paler colors that is still visible even after Botticelli had developed his own stronger color schemes and left Lippi.

  2. Virginia Woolf Lecture 1 - aesthete or feminist revolutionary?

    116:II, middle. The artist's responsibility, then, is to enter sympathetically into these various ways of seeing the world, and bring them into a harmony in the work of art. That harmony is not final or absolute, but a necessary fiction, see final para of novel.

  1. "Art upsets, science reassures" (Braque). Analyze and evaluate this claim.

    The claim is much too general to be precisely correct; at this point it can be said that it is only partially correct. That is because there is art that upsets and science facts that reassure people, just as there are science facts that upset people and art that reassure people.

  2. To what extent do you consider these stereotypes accurate, and to what extent do ...

    To study any phenomena, scientists have to use their common sense as a basis of obtaining knowledge. Science then needs to eradicate subjective elements systematically so they are able to arrive at what is common to all the observations. It is inevitable that scientists are often stereotyped in being objective, disciplined and rational.

  1. “Art upsets, science reassures”

    What they are doing does not need their values as human beings (necessarily), but their intellects to execute the task. In fact, in experimental science, when a scientist finds himself with a set of results, he must be so. Being rational and disciplined helps him to find out the laws

  2. Art upsets, Science reassures

    These are both examples of what art has done to upset the view that one has on the way things work. Not everyone sees their dead father return in a pale, luminescent mist to speak to them, yet, Shakespearean actors would make us think otherwise.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work