• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Corporate Governance - Shareholder's duty of care.

Extracts from this document...


Paper, Corporate Governance UvA 2003 (Prof. dr Arnoud Boot & Prof. mr Jaap Glasz). Shareholder's Duty of Care Martijn Brinkhuis Lodewijk Derkman Tobias van der Hoeven Sjoerd Arlman Preface It was concluded in the NBER's 1998 working paper "Corporate Ownership Around the World" that large corporations are widely held only in economies with good shareholder protection. In the U.S., among the largest firms there is only modest concentration of ownership, while amongst the largest firms in Germany, Italy and Japan a more significant concentration of ownership was found1. In the latter countries especially banks own large blocks of shares. The Netherlands is somewhere in between, banks do not hold large blocks of shares as they do in Germany, Italy and Japan, however shares are not as widely held as in the U.S2. In countries with (semi-) widely held shares, a shareholder with a relatively small stake (e.g. 10%) will not be a controlling shareholder per se, but may be a controlling shareholder de facto. Large shareholders are in principal able to appoint board members representing their interests. Furthermore, large shareholders can also exercise power by blocking ratification of unfavourable decisions, or possibly by initiating decisions3. In other words, when they are large enough, i.e. when there are no other 'large' shareholders in the corporation, the largest shareholder may in fact be 'controlling' the company4. ...read more.


less attractive to them and they are increasingly inclined actively to engage in internal control within the corporation14. Therefore, a way to overcome the problems mentioned earlier is active and continuous monitoring by a large shareholder15, who could be a wealthy investor or an institutional investor, such as a bank, a holding company or a pension fund. Advantages of this -insider- model are that the corporation holds a more stable shareholder base, that although the large shareholder does not control management, it does have the power to adjust managements' policy. Furthermore, it reduces the disparity of information and the 'free-rider' problem16. Duty of Care A potential difficulty with this approach is, who monitors the monitor and the risk of collusion between management (the agent) and the delegated monitor (large shareholder). If dispersed shareholders have no incentive to supervise management and take an active interest in the management of the corporation, why should fund managers have better incentives to oversee management? Even if they are required to vote at the annual shareholders meeting, why should they spend the resources to make informed decisions when the main beneficiaries of those decisions are their own principals, the dispersed investors in the fund?17 Furthermore, there are concerns about the potential for conflicts of interests of those who manage the investment (on behalf of their beneficiaries), both in terms of their relationship with the corporations they invest in and in terms of their internal reward schemes18. ...read more.


Because they have the power to affect the interest of minority shareholders, U.S. corporate law generally provides that large and/or controlling shareholders owe the corporation and its minority shareholders a fiduciary duty of loyalty whenever they exercise any aspect of their control. All shareholders, however, have the right to vote their shares in their best interest. Thus there is some tension between a controlling shareholder's exercise of voting rights, which can arguably be exercised in her own self-interest, and her exercise of "control" over the corporation. It is this exercise of control that gives rise to an obligation of fairness to other shareholders2627. The Dutch corporate law structure is quite different from the systems used in the United States and in Europe in general. Particularly the Dutch 'structural regime' is a real difference28. The 'structural regime' takes away the right of the shareholder to elect the board of directors, and which thus lessens the ability to influence corporate decisions29. Perhaps minority shareholders in the Netherlands are already sufficiently protected against 'unfair' behaviour by large shareholders (under the 'structure regime'). In any instance we believe that shareholders should gain more control in the corporation, in which case the protection of minority of shareholders should automatically become more of an issue in the Netherlands. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Structures, Objectives & External Influences section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Structures, Objectives & External Influences essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ASDA's Ownership

    4 star(s)

    They aim to attract new share buyers. Most of their shareholders are O.A.P (old aged pensioners), banks etc. * Abiding (listening/following) with the various Companies Acts and abiding by the Stock Exchange. * If they want to gain extra finance, they can choose from a variety of sources.

  2. Sole Trader/partnership/co op

    The advantages of being a sole trader are that the owner: * Makes all decisions. * Keeps all profits. * Has total control of the business. * Can start with a little amount of capital (money). * Can keep a simple management structure.

  1. Business report on J Sainsbury's.

    At least one partner must have unlimited liability. Private limited Company - many private limited company start as sole trader or partnerships and gradually expand to different ownership, mostly it is family members running the business. Benefits o Business can be kept small o Because of the limited liability, the owners never can lose more then what they have invested.

  2. Corporate Governance

    Legal commitments forced upon US corporate pension funds to 'manage their assets' hastened this process. Out of this, Corporate governance was inevitably born. Corporate governance is set in the framework and attitudes of political and social history in the UK.

  1. Business report on Bp Amoco.

    BP can also borrow large sums of money in the form of loans, form banks. A bank is more likely loan a large company like a Public Limited Company, money, as they are more likely to pay it back. Banks would be very reluctant to lend money to small companies,

  2. Analysis and own opinion on:Chapter 3 "The Externalizing Machine" of "The Corporation, the pathological ...

    Monk was staying in a motel in a small town. He was shocked when he discovered that paper mill is polluting the river in that town. Monks says that he knew everyone there, the mayor, the mill employees and owners, and he also knew that no one wanted the river

  1. Free essay

    Market Research

    I will find out using an appropriate website, where I want to open the outlet. This will highlight all the surrounding stores and vacant properties. I will use this as a basis to find a vacant suitable site for the new Subway Restaurant.

  2. The Legal Eagles

    Under the 1980 Partnership Act, a partnership is defined as 2 - 20 people (10 in banking) who agree to provide capital and work together in a business with the purpose of making a profit. More than 20 partners are allowed in the case of accountants, solicitors and members of the Stock Exchange.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work