• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically discuss the concept of separate legal entity and its legal consequences and significance for participants, creditors and the economy generally

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The concept of separate legal entity: The double-edged sword Critically discuss the concept of separate legal entity and its legal consequences and significance for participants, creditors and the economy generally Introduction: the Concept of Separate Legal Entity A legal person is described as any human or otherwise who has rights and duties by law. In modern civilized communities all human persons fall into this category however this was not always the case e.g. the slave trade. The concept of the separate legal entity of a company recognizes a company, once incorporated, as a legal person and thus is to be regarded as separate from its members. Assuming limited liability and identified by distinct membership, property ownership, share transferability, perpetual succession, and the other attributes of incorporation, the corporation has many economically and socially beneficial functions. Legal entity distinct from its members One of the most fundamental attributes of the corporate personality is that the corporation is a legal entity distinct from its members. It can benefit from rights and be subject to duties different from those of its members. It was not until the case of Salomon v Salomon & Co. that the implications of this attribute were truly understood even by the courts. Having run a prosperous business for many years Solomon decided to convert into a limited liability company formed with the required number of shareholders: himself, his wife and his five children. ...read more.

Middle

Property Property of the corporation belongs solely to the corporation and the members have no proprietary rights they only have the right to the value of their shares. As directors exit and are replaced through death, resignation or otherwise, the effect on incorporated companies is much smaller than in a partnership. This is because on the physical level the corporation is left unconcerned, the change simply results in the transfer of shares. Of course a change in a manager plays a huge role but much smaller than in a partnership where a change in membership which would cause division of property and other assets, hugely altering the standing of a company. For shareholders and employees this promotes stability and security. Most cases share prices are paid upfront thus entry and exit is relatively simple, and done by only transferring shares. This ease of change makes a shareholder's investment much more liquid and attractive. However after incorporation, a trader will cease to have an insurable interest in the company's assets even if he is the owner of all the shares. Thus if he forgets to assign the insurance policies, nothing will be payable. This was the case in Macaura v. Northern Assurance Co. (1925). Mr. Macaura owned an estate and some timber. He agreed to sell all his timber for the entire share capital of Irish Canadian Saw Mills Ltd. The timber, amounting to approximately the entire assets of the company, was stored on the estate. Mr. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is due to this type's need for capital which is facilitated by the division between shareholders and the board, transferable shares, and the limited liability on shareholders. Large professional firms that do not require as much capital often happily perform under partnerships. Incorporation extended to a single trader or a small partnership facilitates the access to capital without which they may not prosper. However the real issue is how easily these small firms should be allowed to become incorporated. The main concern is the benefit of limited liability since it has a huge impact on potential third parties (often creditors) engaging in business with these companies. The fear is that rather than to raise capital from the public, these firms are aiming to create an entity between themselves and their creditors. The decision in Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd exemplifies this double-edged sword of the principle. On one hand it enables corporations to possibly become capital rich. But on the other hand extending these benefits of incorporation to small companies, it has promoted fraud and the evasion of legal obligations. The flaw lies in the fact that it creates the ability for some to hide behind the "corporate veil" which can be a very powerful and dangerous weapon in the hands of those with fraudulent tendencies. The courts have thus decided to ignore the limited liability doctrine in specific cases, and "lift the veil" for those companies formed or used for fraudulent behavior. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Structures, Objectives & External Influences section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Structures, Objectives & External Influences essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ASDA's Ownership

    4 star(s)

    Every group of stakeholders has a different type of interest. The number of stakeholders also varies from business to business. The more varied they are, the more active the group is. This also causes other businesses to compete interests among these groups.

  2. Political, legal, social factors affacting Tesco.

    Globalization is said to bring people of all nations closer together, especially through a common medium like the economy or the Internet. When trading in a business it is important that the business is aware of the state of the economy.

  1. The Business Environment Coursework. Describe the type of business, purpose and ownership of ...

    This means that they should have different views of how the company should run and their demands would differ. However many shareholders should see that in order to make profit they need to keep their customers happy. A lot of the time stakeholder's in the company wants the company to do well, so they all share a common interest.

  2. For my portfolio, I was asked to do an assignment on two businesses. I ...

    services in communication business most of the work is done by computer while Tesco is a supermarket employs more staff in counters, filling the shelves and security guards etc. in investigated the store in east ham and I was surprised to know that only one person is working in that shop.

  1. Critically evaluate the arguments for and against globalisation, and discuss if such claims are ...

    Stiglitz (2002) argues, globalisation has not produced the promised benefits but he does not question that globalisation has benefited the poor. By globalisation benefiting the poor it certainly has its knock-on effects. Coastal shrimp farmers in India although, this was helping to reduce poverty, were harming the surrounding mangroves because of discharge of chemicals.

  2. Introduction to J Sainsbury plc

    This is important for Sainsbury's Group because they have constantly increased their shares by a high percentage, for the 52 weeks ending 29th March 2003. Judgement 7 Sainsbury's Fair-trade policy demonstrates social conscience, as the marketing and sales department have helped achieve the objective of working with the Fair-trade Foundation:

  1. Business report on J Sainsbury's.

    These sorts of businesses are usually corner shops. Usually one person owns the business and employees only one or two employees to help. There are some advantages of being a sole trader; the main advantage is that all the profit, which is made, goes straight into the owner's pocket.

  2. Explain the legal and ethical issues in relation to the use of business information

    would not be able to give this information under the DPA 1998.If the organisation denies giving this information under the FOIA (2000) they have to explain why they con not give this information. An example of someone receiving this information would be when someone needs information on their criminal record from the police, under the FOIA (2000)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work