The Internet and assurance services.

Authors Avatar

Assurance Project for Travel.com.au

1.0 Introduction

The Internet is the greatest business tool ever invented. Merchant, trading partners and Online retail shoppers can find greater selection, convenience, and lower prices on the Internet. Online businesses can reach millions of shoppers and business partners, provide 24 hours seven days a week of products and services, and better meet their customers individual needs. For these reasons, E-Commerce over the Internet has been growing.

According to ActivMedia, e-commerce activity for 2000 will be $132 billion worldwide, which is twice as much as estimated for 1999. This figure includes revenues from B2C, B2B and Internet services. According to a study by eMarketer in April 2000, almost 34 million US households were actively using the Internet, and of that number 23.5 million or 69% have made a purchase. ()

However, despite the Internet's many advantages and opportunities, it also raises some new risks for businesses and has some customers worried. The risks are fraud, poor sales conversion rates, detrimental effects of negative PR due to privacy breaches and security problems.

A recent study by the Internet Fraud Complaint Centre (IFCC) showed that online auctions accounted for 48.8% of fraud complaints. Non-delivery of goods ordered online came in second, at 19.2%. Other top fraud complaints to the centre involved: securities and commodities (16.9%), credit cards (4.8%) and identity theft (2.9%). The IFCC, which is jointly run by the FBI and the Justice Department's National White Collar Crime Centre, received an average of 1,000 complaints per week after opening in May 2000. ()

In order to reduce risks, many technological solutions have been developed such as Firewalls, encryption, and digital signatures, etc. Despite these available solutions, most of Internet users still lack confidence in the medium. Therefore, third-party assurance service is needed to ensure secure transaction.


2.0 The Third-Party Role of Assurance Service

According to AICPA, Assurance Services are defined as independent professional services that improve the quality or context of information for decision-makers. Assurance services might involve any type of information. The goal of assurance services is information improvement, not the issuance of a report on it.

()

More in detail, AICPA has been categorised its assurance service into two areas. Those are integrity assurance systems and security assurance systems.  According to the textbook (Greenstein, et.al. 2000), integrity assurance systems ensure that the data elements captured in an electronic transaction are the agreed upon elements, and the processing and storage procedures maintain the integrity of the data elements and do not alter them in any unauthorised fashion. Security assurance system ensures the authentication of the transacting parties, and that electronic data are protected from unauthorised disclosure.

There are four areas that assurance service provider has to concern. Those are:

  • Security of data
  • Privacy of data
  • Business policy
  • Transaction processing integrity

Above categories are the most important area that the assurance service provider has to satisfy. And those will be applied to analyse travel.com.au.

3.0 Difference and Similarity between B2B andB2C

The web has evolved as a great medium for running business. Traditional B2B transaction used EDI, phone and fax for transaction. Also, B2C was just relied on
bricks and mortar outlet. However, evolution of technology enables business entity to expand its business to new area, and provides more opportunities.

Despite of Internet’s advantages for business entity, the risk has been arisen along with development of technology. According to recent survey of Computer Security Institute and the FBI, not surprisingly, computer-related crimes are up, as are the costs related to such crimes. This year, the survey included results from 538 respondents from a number of industries -- corporations, government agencies, financial institutions, and universities. This year, total losses, based on the 186 respondents willing to provide details on actual losses, totalled approximately US$378 million. That's up from the US$265 million reported last year by 249 respondents. Based on this data, on average, each of the 186 companies lost more than US$2 million dollars in security breaches.

()

In this section, similarity and differences existing between two models will be analysed.  Based on the result of analysis, our assurance team provides desirable solution for B2B and B2C transaction

B2C Perspective

B2C is relationship is considered very vulnerable, because the party involved in transaction or interactions have no prior knowledge, they are completely strangers.  Many risks involve during B2C transaction such as transmission of sensitive data (ie credit card number).

In B2C e-commerce, the customers are the general public. Therefore, its transaction can be easily exposed. It is the one reason that consumers reluctant to shop over the Online. To decrease the risk and increase positive consumer perception, most of e-tailers employ security system, and state their privacy and security policy in its Web site.

B2B Perspective

B2B are interacting in more secure environment with respect to assurance of the electronic business environment. The nature of B2B e-commerce is that operator just interact with its business customer. Thus, the main concern for B2B is lying in their intellectual property. Many of the intellectual property are stored online in intangible form. Also many confidential information and trade secret is transmitted online. The reason they are safer is because B2B transactions are conducted usually through companies that have an existing relationship with each other or trading contractual agreements. So it can be said that they have mutual relationship. These existing relationships have evolved from the days of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) to the fully functioning web sites on the World Wide Web or on company extranets. Due to evolution, the transaction has been completed within VAN (Value-Added Networks). Although, the evolution enable business entity to interact with its partner more efficient, the risk related in transaction has been increased.


Difference

The differences between two models were briefly explained above. The major differences is that the data they dealing with. In case of B2C, firm concentrate on protecting consumer data such as name and credit card number. In contrast, B2B’s major concern is to protect its intellectual property and other secret information. In other word, given the more highly significant assets exchanging hands or the proprietary information often being shared in the B2B model, its data is considered as much more sensitive for firm’s operation.

Join now!

Due to different payment system, B2C is considered as less secure. Most of e-tailers facilitate credit card payment system. Therefore, it is easily targeted for online criminals. Thus, it is high risk associated with transaction. In contrast, B2B transaction is based on contract between partners. And payment is usually made by credit.

Because of nature of trading, another difference has arisen. B2C firm just has transaction with general customers, while B2B firm deals with their business partners. Therefore, B2B operator needs to know the security weaknesses of its partners’ computer networks. Its Data is only as secure as ...

This is a preview of the whole essay