The purpose of this report is to evaluate problems within Humewood Borough leisure services.

Authors Avatar
.0 Executive Summary

The purpose of this report is to evaluate problems within Humewood Borough leisure services. In order to do this, two important stakeholders were identified (disabled and low-income) as the most excluded groups within Humewood. A number of research techniques have been proposed to assess the extent of their exclusion and also provide suggestions as to ways of increasing their engagement with the leisure services.

2.0 Introduction

A review of other leisure services has been conducted to provide a context for any evaluation of Humewood's leisure centres, and included in the form of a literature review. The objectives of Humewood Borough have been included in the hierarchy of objectives to provide an understanding of the borough's aims, so it knows what services to provide. Humewood Borough's problems have also been identified.

2.1 Literature Review

A comparison with Birmingham City Council (49 Leisure Centres)

Handsworth facilities:

Junior Football Academy

Information about swimming facilities (prices, times, days etc)

Disabled access to majority of facilities

Information about gymnasium (prices, times etc)

Kickboxing

Exercise (Aqua tone, Boxercise etc)

Lessons for swimming

Leisure card (incentive to join, half price) for which there is criteria i.e. disability, income, students etc.

Procedure for comments written in various languages

Ref: Birmingham City Council (2003)

A comparison with Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council (9 Leisure Centres)

Harry Mitchells facilities:

Cycling club

Equal opportunities (comments etc)

Gym

Fitness sessions

Service Charter (to improve service)

Leisure Pass

No disabled access for upstairs

Sport Holiday Camps

Sandwell Borough Council (2003) Leaflet

2.2 Assessment of the Problem

To begin this report an analysis of the problems within Humewood has been conducted and included below.

Problem:

* Council overspent annual budget

* Decided to recover some of the loss by taking money that is used for the public leisure services

* Possibly as a result some of the leisure centres will have to close

* Is it still the 'Leisure For All?'

* Need a strategy to improve performance

How did council get into this state?

* Improper use of funds

* Not having an efficient budgetary method

* Poor records kept of previous spending

* Under qualified staff in leisure industry

* Not enough investment

* No disabled access for the deaf or blind

3.0 Management Objectives

Objectives

. Equal access for all

The council believes it is right to ensure anyone could access the service if they choose to regardless of financial status, disabilities, and ethnicity and over riding circumstances.

2. Effective and Efficient use of Resources

The Council believes that optimal use of resources should be one of its main objectives, as it could enable cost cutting and investment in poor areas. A best value regime will enable leisure services to provide customers a good service at a cost effective price. A consideration is necessary as to which leisure centres are making financial losses.

3. Create a climate in which changes to services and facilities could be considered

A climate is required in which a reflection and review could be conducted as to changes in services that would help remedy specific issues (e.g. stakeholder issues) that are specific to a leisure centre. The cost of maintaining capital goods: e.g. maintaining a pool with broken down heating system.

4. Main issues regarding the 4Es need to be considered; in particular equity and economy

The inherent problems concern equity, which is relating to gender in take (e.g. males only or females only) and economy, which concern lack of investment in facilities in certain leisure centres and generating a profit which could be used to build to improve facilities in state of disrepair or help expansion in service provision or building another part to the existing leisure centre so it can provide a more comprehensive service which would (possibly) help meet issues regarding equity and equality.

An outline of the management issues has been included as Appendix 11.1

4.0 Review of Current Situation

To fully understand how Humewoods leisure services can be improved, a review of the current centres has been included in this report.

4.1 Stakeholder Analysis

As part of the collection of tools used to analyses the current situation, a stakeholder analysis has been conducted within Humewood, to indicate those that will be affected by, and those that have any interest in, changes that may occur within Humewood's leisure service.

This document is designed to be used when considering how actions taken can affect others, deciding which groups within Humewood should be considered and perhaps changing the position of groups for the benefit of all (for example, moving a group from low influence to high influence to improve the services provided). See Appendix 11.2.

4.2 SWOT Analysis

A SWOT analysis has been included to analyse the strengths and weaknesses of each leisure centre (see Appendix 11.3).

5.0 Benchmarking

Benchmarking is an analytical process, used by organisations to establish where they are and where they want to be.

'...future survival and 'best of the best' success may require step changes, quantum leaps and re-engineering' (Bullivant, J.R.N 1994)

This is done by comparisons with other organisations with indifferent circumstances and a similar competitive environment '...by comparison elsewhere that the new targets are relevant and achievable...'

(Bullivant, J.R.N 1994)

A table identifying the problems within each leisure centre has been included as Appendix 11.4

These are the problems that have been identified in each of the leisure services, with these recognized it is now possible to compare each one in turn to a comparable leisure service in which strategies for potential solutions may be established.

The research methodology within this report follows that suggested by Bullivant, J.R.N (1994) which has been included as Appendix 11.5.

The Safari centre is doing far better than the other leisure centres in Humewood (Kruger, Shamwari and Addo). Because of this Safari can be used as benchmark for the others. The ambition should to bring the performance of the others up to the level of the Safari leisure centre. The best practices adopted within Safari are namely full accessibility to all groups, special events for different stakeholders and a broad range of activities to attract many people and an optimistic outlook.

The Golf Club is doing well and helps support other unprofitable leisure centres. In can be seen as a benchmark and for this reason it's performance figures over the past few years has been chosen as a benchmark.

Scotia swimming pool is a facility different from any other in Humewood. For this reason we have had to look outside Humewood to find a site which is similas. We have chosen Harborne Swimming Baths in Harborne which is regarded as a good lesirure centre.
Join now!


5.1 Benchmarking; Performance Indicators

As part of the benchmarking process, it must be decided how the performance of a particular service or leisure centre should be measured. These measures, called performance indicators, have been chosen to reflect the mission statement of the authority. They are therefore designed to measure the quality of the service, accessibility by minority groups and the overall leisure experience. The performance indicators are divided into three groups - Quality, Service delivery outcomes and Equal access.

See Appenidx 11.6 for a list of the performance indictors to be used in comparison within this ...

This is a preview of the whole essay