• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far is it possible to explain the differences between the Parthenon and the Temple of Zeus at Olympia?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far is it possible to explain the differences between the Parthenon and the Temple of Zeus at Olympia? I am going to weigh the differences between two Greek temples, and explain how far it is possible to distinguish between the two, based on sources, primary and secondary. The first Greek temple is the Parthenon, which is also related to as the Temple of Athena. The second Greek temple is the temple of Zeus at Olympia. I will outline the following elements which help to differentiate the two Greek temples: o Architecture o Symbolic Value o Purpose/Religious, cultural elements o Social Space o Political Functions Architecture: The Parthenon was built on the Acropolis and replaced an older model of the Temple of Athena that had been eradicated by the Persians in 480BC.The Parthenon is an octostyle peripteral Doric temple with Ionic architectural features. Doric columns stand directly on the stylobate of a temple without the base, their vertical shafts are fluted with parallel concave grooves, and they are topped by a smooth capital that flashes from the column to meet a square abacus at the intersection with the horizontal beam that they carried. The Ionic style is thinner and more elegant. Its capital is decorated with a scroll-like design (volute). Unlike the Greek Doric order, Ionic columns normally stand on a base which separates the shaft of the column from the stylobate. ...read more.

Middle

Through secondary sources I found out that the most characteristic feature in the architecture and decoration of the Parthenon is the 'Ionic frieze running around the exterior walls of the cella. Carved in bas-relief, it most likely depicts an idealized version of the Panathenaic procession from the Dipylon Gate in the Kerameikos to the Acropolis.' The sculpture on the east end embellishes the mythical chariot race, overseen by the god itself, between Pelops, whom the Greeks called the founder of the Olympic Games, and Oenomaos, a king of Pisa. Above both porches, the metopes display scenes from the Twelve Labors of Heracles, whose strength made him an important figure for the athletes. Purpose/Religious cultural elements: Although both the Greek temples main purpose would've been seen as a place of worship, there are also other things linked to their purpose and religious significance. There is no evidence as such that I have found which shows that the Temple of Zeus at Olympia was anything more than a temple and was made only to house the Statue of Zeus. And also the Olympic Games were considered to be part of religious rituals that revolved around the King of gods, Zeus. 'So it was only fitting that a grand temple and an even grander cult representation were constructed for the many Greeks who made pilgrimages there in order to worship their father god'. ...read more.

Conclusion

On the contrary, the Temple of Zeus at Olympia was an example of pure Doric features, making it less elegant and eye-catching to the public in comparison to the Parthenon. It illustrated its main symbolic value of the ongoing struggle for power in Ancient Greece through its metope and one of the classical Seven Wonders of the Ancient World, the statue of the King of gods, Zeus. The Temple of Zeus at Olympia was a typical Greek sanctuary built to house the statue of Zeus and let pilgrimages enter and worship their father god. Its grounds were also used to host the Olympics. Visitors were allowed to enter the Temple of Zeus at Olympia and glance and the statue. The site of the Temple of Zeus at Olympia also consisted of a stadium (for the games) and a sacred grove, or Altis, where temples were located. This shows that the Temple of Zeus at Olympia was used as a social space and people were allowed to enter. The Temple of Zeus at Olympia didn't have any political functions, due to the temple not being based on democracy and because it was mainly made for the masses and as a religious usage. The two Greek temples can be identified separately to a great deal. Their differences are so highlighted that it is to the highest degree possible to explain the differences between them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Classics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Classics essays

  1. 'How do the Ancient Olympic Games differ from the Modern Olympic Games? Which do ...

    They are inclusive and tolerant. In fact athletes from small countries are often given special favour if they win. Not only can women compete, but there are also 12 mixed events. The ideals of the games are enshrined in the motto, "Faster, higher, better". In the Modern Olympic Games the country has almost taken the place of the god.

  2. Literary Elements in The Bluest Eye

    meaning of her work by the colloquial and cynical tone of the plot. Morrison often uses vernacular that is common to the characters in the novel, so that the reader can relate to the novel's situations on a more personal level, which gives the story an idiomatic tone.

  1. Describe the main temples on the Altis. Which in your opinion is the most ...

    The Heraion actually begun as a small Doric temple of wood with only a pronaos (10 x 39.5 m) and not until c. 600 B.C. was enlarged by the addition of an opisthodomos and the new form of a peripteral temple (18.76 x 50 m; 6 x 16 columns).

  2. In this essay I will be examining the reasons why against all odds the ...

    This use of advanced armour and military combat technique was a system used throughout Greece. Sparta however was the only true professional army with no protective wall around their city, using only the men of the agoge to protect it and act as its wall.

  1. Was Julius Caesar an effective leader?

    He was not bold enough to take the dictatorship and use its strength to engineer his control. He neither took full power for himself, nor did he hand it all back to the Senate, his third way saw a sharing of power between dictator and Senate.

  2. Investigation of the effect of changes in ionic concentration on the e.m.f of a ...

    Therefore, the electrode potential of the half-cell would also change. The change in electrode potential could then be predicted by the Nernst equation. For a Cu(s)/ Cu 2+(aq) half-cell, E = E0 + {0.059 log [Cu 2+(aq)]}/n E: electrode potential, E0: standard electrode potential n: number of electrons involved For a Fe3+ (aq)/ Fe2+ (aq)

  1. Assess the respective contributions of Athens and Sparta and other Greeks to Greek victory ...

    The Greeks were fighting for their homeland, family and the lasting honour of Greece and were willing to fight to the death as exemplified in the Battle of Thermopylae. The Persians on the other hand were fighting because they were told to do so; and for the wealth, booty and honour.

  2. To what extent is the theme of gender confusion used to create comic effect ...

    [loss of virility]: and so the Scythians say that they are afflicted as a consequence of this and also that those who visit Scythian territory see among them the condition of those whom the Scythians call 'Hermaphrodites' [someone/thing that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work