• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are the sources for our understanding of the significance of tribunes in Roman politics in the period after 70 BC?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How useful are the sources for our understanding of the significance of tribunes in Roman politics in the period after 70 BC? At 70 BC during their joined consulship Pompey and Crassus restored the office of the tribunes to its original power since it had been crippled by Sulla during his reign of Terror. This was done by Sulla as it was one of the most significant positions for one to hold in order to influence Roman politics. The tribunes had increased political power since the foundation of the office. The plebeians, anxious to participate in political life and to eliminate the economic exploitation of the patricians by breaking their monopoly of power, set up the office of the tribunes. They came around as a body to counteract the ineffectiveness of the Senate as they were 'defenders of the rights of the people' for 'votes to be free from patrician influence' (Macer's speech). The 10 annually elected tribunes presided over the Concilium Plebis whose decisions (plebiscita) were binding on all people due to the Lex Hortensia in 287 BC. The tribunes attended the meetings of the Senate, providing a more democratic element in the Republic as they could exercise the power of veto even on the senatorial legislations. ...read more.

Middle

This proved how popular the tribunes could be with the people as this act brought popularity to the two consuls. Tribunes could be used to undermine the traditional powers of the senate, often exploited by politically ambitious men to promote their own political careers. In essence, a clever consul or an ambitious individual could buy them though bribery to impose his policies as they preferred 'committing wrong for payment than do right for nothing' (Macer's speech). Both Pompey and Caesar used tribunes to acquire authority. As Suetonius informs us Gabinius passed for Pompey his lex gabinia so that he was given command against the pirates (despite the opposition that Cssius Dio says Gabinius faced) and Manilius proposed that Pompey should be given command against Mithridates. The tribunes' accomplishments are significant since both tasks brought Pompey enormous glory. Vatinius 'though not coming cheap' passed Caesar's legislations through the assembly by bypassing the senate. One of the most important tribunes was Clodius 'who recognized no limits' (Velleius). He was a patrician who underwent adoption in order to become plebeian (Suetonius 20) so as to manage to be elected tribune - such was the importance of the office! ...read more.

Conclusion

On the other hand, Mark Antony's importance in the Roman Politics did not occur while he was a tribune but later on when he was part of the 2nd Triumvirate. As a result, the tribunes could after the course of events, but other offices or positions of power (e.g. consul/dictator) could be more effective. Suetonius, additionally, informs us that upon Caesar's death Octavian 'felt it his duty to avenge Caesar and keep his decrees in force'. 'Stronger authority was needed to implement his plans [thus he] announced his candidature for a tribune ship...although he was a patrician and not yet a Senator,' therefore Octavian considered the tribunes a way to affect Roman politics. Due to that, in 23 BC Augustus received tribunitian sacrosanctity which gave him civil authority and all the power of the tribunes without actually holding the office, being his constitutional basis for the Principate. The very fact the existence and power of the tribunes was an issue of contention shows their importance. However, the tribunate died a death along with a lot of other positions of authority after Julius Caesar's death in 44 BC. The concentration of power into the hand of tribunes like Clodius is what eventually led to the collapse of the republic and all their powers being given to the first Roman Emperor, Augustus. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Classics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Classics essays

  1. To what extent did the Roman emperor Augustus restore the republic?

    the Senate acted largely as a rubber stamp to Augustus and agreed unconditionally with him due to his influence over him. This therefore meant that whilst things operated similarly in the Senate house, in reality it was under the thumb of the emperor Augustus as a result of his auctoritas

  2. According to the Res Gestae and Suetonius' Life of Augustus, how effective were Augustus' ...

    This could be considered unfair because it would mean those not part of Augustus' family or close circle of friends would not be able to reach the higher posts due to the discrimination, but those deserving of the posts because of reaching high rank would be more than suitable to run the army.

  1. Were coins used in the Roman Empire more for propaganda purposes or as a ...

    The riot did not stop until Nero ordered 'troops to club them'. When Nero had divorced her, and then married Agrippina, Poppaea was not happy, so she had her head to be cut off, and 'taken to Poppaea to see'2.

  2. In your opinion, where did the real power lie within the Spartan Constitution?

    This then wasn't efficient and quite cumbersome of the Constitution. The Assembly itself, as aforementioned, had the power to block any laws proposed by the Gerousia but, they couldn't speak out against the proposals; instead only being able to say 'yes' or 'no' to the proposal and not offer an improvement or possible change to it.

  1. To what extent do the sources suggest that Rome had become ungovernable by the ...

    and possibly reflecting the instability of Roman poetics; how clients and patrons, alliances and friendships are temperamental in this field. Plutarch is a biographer, and whist he may report some myths, he was writing far after this time so had access to a number of sources - and is perhaps as accurate as he could have been.

  2. To what extent does the evidence support the view that Roman emperors paid very ...

    The emperor was not expected to do such things, which proves Augustus? dedication to the act of justice. Claudius remained to act in a very much like Augustus, showing a conscientious approach to acting as a judge, despite any other events such as his birthday (Suet.

  1. To what extent and for what reasons did Augustus resist the creation of an ...

    Augustus evidently sponsored Augustan Literature, through Maecenus? patronage of several poets. There are many clear examples of Augustus either being associated with the Gods in literature, or being portrayed as god himself. There is no doubt that Augustus knew about these comparisons prior to recital or publication and therefore encouraged these attempts to link himself with deities.

  2. To what extent did the military reforms of Marius contribute to the collapse ...

    In addition, Sallust [Jugurthine War; pg.100], a ?Novus Homo? (New Man), further supports the significance of this, observing, ?not, in accordance with traditional custom, from the propertied classes, but accepting any man who volunteered?. In order to put this reform into practice, Marius decided to utilize his new army in the Jugurthine and Germanic Wars.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work