• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"If human nature does alter, it will be because we begin to look at ourselves in a new way." In what ways, and by what means, do the works of writers you have studied make us "look at ourselves in a new way"?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"If human nature does alter, it will be because we begin to look at ourselves in a new way." In what ways, and by what means, do the works of writers you have studied make us "look at ourselves in a new way"? What is human nature? According to an interesting article I have read, humanity can be interpreted in three ways: mechanistic, mysterian and materialist views of humanity. A mechanistic view sees human beings largely as objects through which nature acts. A mysterian view suggests that there are aspects of human existence not knowable to mere mortals. A materialist view sees humans as exceptional because humans, unlike any other beings, possess consciousness and agency. In Judaism, human nature is the ability to make our own choice and we will all be held responsible for our actions. From a scientific perspective, human nature is the behavior of human being physically, socially and mentally. There are many different interpretations of human nature and it will never have a specific definition. From my point of view, human nature is how human beings interpret themselves as. Therefore, human nature does alter when we begin to look at ourselves in a new way. In this essay, I have chosen one play from "The Three Theban Plays" by Sophocles; "Oedipus the King" and "Death and the Maiden" by Ariel Dorfman. Looking at the two tragedies, I am going to illustrate how the writers make us "look at ourselves in a new way". ...read more.

Middle

This emphasizes the idea of humans are often blind to themselves, the others and also the truth behind things. When they seek to search for the truth, the outcome can be catastrophic: "Messenger: He rips off her brooches, the long gold pins holding her robes - ......he digs them down the sockets of his eyes," (Pg.237 L1402-1405) "Messenger: And there we saw the woman hanging by the neck, ......spinning, swinging back and forth." (Pg. 237 L1395-1397) In the exodus of the play, the ending is a disaster, Jocasta hanged herself and Oedipus blinded himself. Truth can be harmful sometimes, therefore it is better to stay the same and be ignorant. At least we could be better off and happier because truth sometimes doesn't give us any satisfaction at all. This made us to have a whole new perception about the exploration of truth. After studying the play, I would be more objective about my actions and be humble to the others' advice, to prevent anything destructive happening. But on the other hand, Oedipus is a man of great quality, he had the courage to seek for the truth even though people persuaded him not to because the truth was dangerous. If we are satisfy about the current state and choose to be "blind" to many truths on the world, there would be no improvement and development at all. There is certainly no an ultimate answer to the question whether or not we should seek for the truth. ...read more.

Conclusion

Perhaps Miranda is guilty, the truth is so thrilling that even me as an audience wanted to know it so badly. In the end, nobody knows if justice has been achieved by Paulina's outrageous actions. The play also exemplify the idea of too much truth may be dangerous. On the way of searching the truth, Paulina didn't realize that she is destroying many things, their relationships, and Gerardo's trust to her etc. Gerardo had already warned her not to continue her pursuit of truth: "Gerardo: People can die from an excessive dose of the truth, you know." (Pg. 36) Gerardo could foresee the disastrous outcome of the whole event and tried to stop Paulina continue to look for the truth. It is because Gerardo sensed that too much truth won't do good to all of them. The idea of too much truth is dangerous in "Death and the Maiden" links back to the idea of the catastrophic consequences of obtaining the truth from "Oedipus the King". Paulina and Oedipus are very similar, they strife for the truth which they don't know is destructive. Paulina destroyed the relationship between Gerardo and herself; whereas Oedipus devastated his kingdom, his family and most significantly, he blinded himself. Both tragedies raised our caution to the pursuit of truth, acknowledge us that truth is double-edged, it can favour but also destroy someone. Human can't be too ignorant and also can't know too much truth. "It is better to settle for half." as Alfieri puts it in the play "A View from the Bridge". ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Classics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Classics essays

  1. Giving examples describe the way in which Aristophanes tried to make his audience laugh; ...

    Finally we see a lot of farce jokes used in the WASPs from crude jokes about sex with slave girls to toilet humour. For example we see Bdelycleon convincing his father to stay at home and set up his own court room and we see

  2. In what ways does The Simpsons portray American family and social values?

    Homer will depart for work, the kids go to school and Marge stays at home. Bart and Lisa's friends (and enemies) make an appearance when the school bus comes by their house to collect them, and there is often a quick scene between Bart and either Milhouse or Ralph, as well as between Lisa and Martin.

  1. Jason behaves so badly that it is impossible for us to sympathise with his ...

    won the fight and she is on his side, cunningly persuading him to give Glauce the gifts immersed in poison in order to kill her. The manipulation of Jason in this way could put him up on the sympathy scale in some aspects, such as the fact that he is

  2. "Virgil invites us to see in Aeneas a new Odysseus often in similar situations ...

    Odysseus' gives up any hope of reaching home whilst stranded on Calypsos' island and spends his days crying because he believes that he will never see his home again. Both Aeneas and Odysseus have gods pitted against them. Aeneas has Juno against him "By the powers of Juno suffering much in war until he could found a city."

  1. The whole purpose of humour is to 'make people laugh'. Do you agree with ...

    I entirely disagree with this topic that the whole purpose of humour is to 'make people laugh' since humour and laughter are

  2. How far was Plato's perception of rhetoric a consistent one?

    fiction portraying terrible things such as the 'sufferings of Niobe, or the house of Pelops, or the Trojan War, or any similar topic'15. He would also forbid the gods to be portrayed as behaving badly, as this will plant the wrong ideas in the young, as the gods should be a perfect moral example.

  1. Cinderella - play script

    What a relief to be among real people. Lionel: Listen to me. I am a real person. Does that tell you anything? Believe me, they are all out there wishing they could be you! Prince: Because they have no idea what it's really like! Lionel: Help me out here.

  2. Abandoned and Redeemed: Comparing the works of Ibsen and Sophocles

    Oedipus was a victim of society in this play. He had been respected by his people, but also expected to protect them and to destroy the plague that infected them. He was put under pressure to find a solution to the plague and also to his prophecy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work