• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what way if at all does Herodotus overemphasize the role of individuals in the conflict between Xerxes and the Greeks?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In what way if at all does Herodotus overemphasize the role of individuals in the conflict between Xerxes and the Greeks? The aim of Herodotus in writing his history is to 'display his inquiry, so that human achievements may not become forgotten in time... [and] not be without their glory' (Book 1, 1). Herodotus' objective is to outline the causes of the conflict between Xerxes and the Greeks, thus he attempts to explain the reason behind the Persian Wars. His account aims to preserve human achievements ('ta genomena ex anthropon') and the role of individuals so that they will not fade through time and that their great and marvelous deeds ('erga megala te kai thomasta') both by Greeks and barbarians will not be without their glory (kleos), having their share in history. Thus, in his aim to praise the achievements of individuals, he often overemphasizes them, providing superficial analysis of events. Though his account contains inaccuracies, bias and error, it is unique as he was the first to attempt writing a universal history and we have no other major source, apart from archaeological findings, to compare it with. ...read more.

Middle

Being a narrow passage would not give an advantage to the numerically greater Persian army and there Leonidas could defend central Greece, making also a stand to encourage unity. He was 'respected' and 'in command of the whole army', with 'the 300 men whom he brought to Thermopylae being chosen by himself', consequently he was responsible for choosing the most capable! He was such an important figure in the struggle against Xerxes that he was sent in advance of the main army to discourage the medizing of other states. In this occasion, Herodotus leaves aside his pro Athenian bias and experiences the Hellenic proudness of a 'memorable fight' even if it was a loss. Leonidas' army was so successful at first that made Xerxes 'leapt from his seat 3 times, in terror for his army,' however when Ephialtes betrayed a secret passage to the Persians, Leonidas had no choice but to stay and fight in order to give his army time to retreat. 'Honor forbade that he himself should go' as some of the Greeks that accompanied him did. Herodotus here indeed concentrates on individuals as he is focusing only on the Spartan sacrifice, accusing the Thebans that assisted them of 'strongly being suspected of Persian sympathies' and the legend failing to reproduce the Thespian contribution at Thermopylae. ...read more.

Conclusion

Apart from Artemisium where he used bribery, pro-Hellenic propaganda on the rocks and outstanding maneuvering, his crowning achievement was Salamis. He was among those that believed that the Delphic oracle meant ships when it said that 'the wooden wall shall not fail, but help you', therefore 'he advised his countrymen to prepare to meet the invader' at 'divine Salamis' (Book 7, 141-143). He even managed to persuade the Spartan commander Eurybiades that there was the most appropriate place to fight. Herodotus, also describes an incident that Themistocles sent a slave to Xerxes, urging them to attack them at Salamis since at the time they were divided on opinion as to where to fight but modern historians believe that this was just part of the plan - another brilliant idea of Themistocles that contributed to eliminating the Persian fleet. Salamis was the battle that destroyed the Persian fleet of Xerxes so much that made a future naval advance impossible - all because of Themistocles, despite the fact that Herodotus presents his as supposedly receiving advice from Mnesiphilus on how to act. Themistocles capability stroked a terrible blow, leaving Persians unwilling to encounter Athens again at sea, though Herodotus hardly attributes him any credit. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Classics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Classics essays

  1. Assess the respective contributions of Athens and Sparta and other Greeks to Greek victory ...

    to risk an all out fight again a much larger Persian force. This argument further emphasises the point that if it not for the Athenian contribution to the fleet, then the Greeks may not have been able to hold their own on the seas and the outcome of the naval battles may have been very different.

  2. Euripides was accused by his contempories of being a woman hater. Why do you ...

    However, Phaedra couldn't possibly compete with Medea. Medea is a sorceress who helps Jason retrieve the Golden Fleece. She is the title role of the play and she is probably the most evil woman in all of Greek tragedy. Out of revenge on the adulterous Jason, she murders his young

  1. In this essay I will be examining the reasons why against all odds the ...

    their own political and economical establishments, ousting out the tyrants with the power of the many against the ruling of one. "The power of Athens had been great before, but became greater than ever when they had got rid of the tyrants".

  2. Was Julius Caesar an effective leader?

    Augustus was hailed as saviour of Rome for bringing an end to civil war, Julius was not. So a comparison of the two by Yavetz is unfair. Caesar military accomplishments were phenomenal. There is relatively little historical debate surrounding his effectiveness as a military leader.

  1. What was the function of hadrians wall

    on the Southern side of the Wall which goes against Bede's idea of a protection from the North- surely a system such as this would suggest a threat from the south as well? Historians and archaeologist a like have argued the possibly purposes of this feature of the Wall.

  2. Cinderella - play script

    Off! Pull it harder, you idiot, harder! (By now the Stepsisters have joined in to help pry the slipper off the Stepmother's foot) Lionel: Madam, there is no need for name calling! On the count of three... one... two...

  1. To what extent was the battle of Salamis a turning point in Xerxes' campaign ...

    This suggests that, as the connecting factor between failure and success, Salamis was the turning point in Xerxes? campaign. Greek strategy changed considerably at Salamis; whereas Leonidas and his Spartan force of 300 men dominated Thermopylae, Salamis was predominately directed by Themistocles and the Athenian navy.

  2. Greek History - the status of the Helots in Sparta

    According to Fornara, the helots were used ?very cruelly? and their subjugators ?assigned the helots every shameful task leading to every disgrace.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work