Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8

Oedipus the King VS. "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge" "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge" by Ambrose Bierce is a 19th Century mystery story

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

Natasha Naidu English 2 Ms. Lori Fox May 19th 2005 Research Paper Oedipus the King VS. "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge" "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge" by Ambrose Bierce is a 19th Century mystery story that is set at the time of the American Civil War (1861-1865), when the Slave owning Confederate States in the South engaged in conflict with the Federal Government of the USA. The story focuses on a character called Peyton Farquhar, who was about to be hung for trespassing the Owl Creek Bridge. The story ends with a curious twist in the plot. The main aspect of the story is set in Farquhar's mind, however while reading, at the first instinct, the reader is unsure (despite careful, hidden hints placed by Bierce) of this fact. Only at the end, when it is clearly stated that Farquhar is hanging lifelessly with a broken neck from the bridge that the reader will become conclusively aware of this facet. In Oedipus the King by Sophocles', it is a 5th century Greek tragedy play that is set at the time of major battle against the Persian navy also known as Golden Age. (Sophocles, 1880)

Middle

"Peyton Farquhar was dead; his body with a broken neck, swung gently from side to side beneath the timbers of the Owl Creek bridge" (Bierce). Cathy Davidson states, "Death is a cessation of the impression through the senses, and the pulling of the strings which move the appetites..." (Davidson 146). To what extent is Oedipus responsible for his own fate? In looking at the play Oedipus the King, I found several possibilities surrounding his fate. Firstly, one of the assumptions that can be drawn is that perhaps as destiny controls all fates, then Oedipus' character was created long before he was conceived. On the other hand, we could also say that perhaps Oedipus' horrific fate came about because of his character. The third possibility is that everything is inevitable - therefore no one ever has had any say in their own fate, let alone Oedipus. The first explanation to this question is the idea that destiny makes character. As destiny, supposedly in the Greek mindset, maps out all events before they occur, we can today assume with this logic that perhaps the components that "built" Oedipus' character were caused by fate. We know today that character is determined by biological factors and experience.

Conclusion

I believe Oedipus was a great tragic hero because he saved the towns life even though he ruined his own. His fate was tested through out the play and he chooses to deny it. Bierce has a unique style to pull the reader into the story. To name a few techniques, his complex illusions keep the audience in suspense, his detailed descriptions allow the reader to picture all aspects of the story and the dividing of the story into three separate parts help them to stay focused. In "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge", Farquhar's fantasy overtakes his reality leaving him with only one option on returning to reality death. Numerous critics argue the relevancy of the plot of "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge". The fantasy and reality connection between Farquhar's imagination and the hanging make the story. Bierce creates suspense and confusion through mind deception. Time manipulation, the fantasy realm, and the overlapping of dreams and reality equally deceive the reader and the protagonist. Yet to those of who accept fate, perhaps this could be the explanation. It is a completely personal decision, based on an individual interpretation. King Oedipus and Farquhar make their own decisions in their own way and lives with the consequences those brought. There is no one correct answer for interpretation in the 21st Century, in depends completely on individuals perception of the actuality of fate.

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

Related AS and A Level Classics

  1. Cinderella - play script

    --In Cinderella's kitchen-- Cinderella: Go to the ball? Me? Why would I want to go to the ball? I'd much rather sit here by the fire. (sings) In my own littler corner, in my own little chair I can be whatever I want to be On the wings of my fancy, I can fly anywhere and the world will

  2. Antigone - Moral Law V.S Political Law.

    The moral laws which Antigone values are essential in this case because Kreon shows many negative qualities which make him appear as a tyrant king. He misuses power and abuses power. Kreon considers that a state belongs to the most powerful man, which in this case is him.

  1. Sight Vs. Blindness in Oedipus: A Battle of Figurative and Literal Proportions

    Oedipus further insults Teiresias by asserting that he "can do no harm/ To...any man who has his eyes" (375-376). What Oedipus cannot see is that Teiresias' literal blindness does not impede his strength or wisdom. In Teiresias, blindness is a virtue for he is able to realize that "the truth will come to light, without [his]/ help" (341-342).

  2. Greek Tragedy

    He left Thebes as a blind beggar. Although in some respects Oedipus is now seen as no longer a hero, the audience would have respected his final decisions, and in some way he had corrected his moral flaw through his self-punishment.

  1. Discuss the ways in which the character of Oedipus in Oedipus the King conforms ...

    Thus Oedipus's intelligence, a trait that brings him closer to the gods, is what causes him to commit the most atrocious of all possible sins. In killing the Sphinx, Oedipus is the city's savior, but in killing Laius (and marrying Jocasta), he is its curse.

  2. Review of Oedipus the King

    must now examine what binds all the fore-mentioned features together - the use of language. Already discussed is Sophocles' technique of Verbal and Dramatic irony, however, before drawing conclusion it is necessary to shed light on the importance of the use of dialogue and the Chorus as narrative and the

  1. Jason behaves so badly that it is impossible for us to sympathise with his ...

    for his own personal gain in reputation, power and carrying on the blood line, not much love or affection being shown for them at all. It is for this reason Medea decides to kill them, as she knows this is all Jason really cares about, as he is extremely power-hungry

  2. How far do you agree that Sophocles "Oedipus the King" is nothing more than ...

    " I pity you but I can't bear to look. ... but you.... I shudder at the sight." Oedipus speaks to the crowd, "Touch the man of grief. Do. Don't be afraid". Here Oedipus is almost begging the chorus to touch him, it shows the chorus' pity and sorrow they have for him as well as their fear.

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.