• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Portrayal of blindness in The Outsider and Oedipus the King

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Portrayal of blindness in The Outsider and Oedipus the King A primitive motif in Oedipus the King by Sophocles and The Outsider by Albert Camus is blindness. The protagonists in the novels are blinded to a personal truth, and are physically blinded as well. In The Outsider, Meursault's blindness is metaphorical, as he is negligent to his own absurdity, which he later becomes categorized as. On the other hand, Oedipus's blindness is literal, as he is ignorant to the truth of his life; and the fact that he is incapable of escaping the destiny that the Gods have set out for him, which resulted in him gorging his eyes out. The characters suffer an emotional and physical blindness, which leads to tragic irony in Oedipus the King and existential irony in The Outsider. In both the novels, it is only towards the end that the two protagonists release themselves from their crudeness of the truth. ...read more.

Middle

Akin to Meursault, Oedipus is also blind towards accepting and understanding his life, and where he originated from. Astonishingly, given that Oedipus is given many hints that could lead him towards understanding his life, he still fails to detect them. The most distinct ironies in the two novels come from the blind prophet, as he is literally blind and yet he understands a great deal more than Oedipus, who was not physically blind at the time. Teiresias points this out to Oedipus very bluntly by saying " you have taunted me with blindness, you have your sight yet you cannot see where, nor with whom, you live, nor in what horror (411-413)." In The Outsider, the blinding light is constantly portrayed, and the main purpose of this would have been to highlight Meursault's mental blindness. The light is usually brought about in the parts of the novel where something important that would lead to Meursault's understanding takes place. ...read more.

Conclusion

Alliteration was used by Camus to evoke empathy in the readers and portray how the sunlight stroke Meursault like fire, thus blinding him from reality. The theme of blindness in The Outsider and Oedipus the King is intermittent, and appears in a metaphorical and literal manner. The protagonist's blindness is portrayed through literary techniques such a repetition, diction, metaphors and alliteration. In The Outsider, it was ephemeral and brought about by sunlight, while in Oedipus the King it was a permanent issue and was brought about by Oedipus himself. However, the metaphorical blindness of both Oedipus and Meursault was an evolution throughout the novel, as they eventually come to terms with the philosophies in which Camus and Sophocles had in mind. At the end of both the novels, the character's blindness leads them to finally understand the circumstance in which they are in. When Meursault finally understands the meaning of his life, he becomes the absurd hero whereas Oedipus' outlook becomes more realistic and he ironically gorges his eyes out. Similar to Meursault, he intends to prove that he has not advanced to anything from his new found discoveries. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Classics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Classics essays

  1. Review of Oedipus the King

    In his pride, Oedipus is hasty and shows a lack of patience. Wishing to end this mystery of the death of Laius as quickly as possible and once again be the saviour of his people, Oedipus passes a decree to kill or exile anyone who withholds information.

  2. Why did the Romans invade Britain and how did they affect it?

    Once Roman town life whittled away, the need for imports did as well. Socially, there was a major effect on Roman-Britains in the province.

  1. Discuss the contribution of material culture studies to the understanding of social identity.

    Brooches can be seen as useful towards understanding identity as they could have several uses such as expressing age, gender, ethnicity and what class a wearer belongs to. Literature can be useful, however there is the problem of it being written from a 'Romano-centric' viewpoint and has the potential to be very biased.

  2. Compare and contrast the portrayal of the Gods in Virgil's Aeneid and Ovid's metamorphoses.

    openly supported the Greek camp, while Zeus had been distracted from the battlefield; she even seduced the king of the gods, so that Poseidon could give strength and support to the Greeks, thus ensuring their victory over the Trojans.2 Furthermore, Virgil highlights the Homeric power and dark feeling of hatred

  1. Outline your understanding of the Oedipus complex and its significance for psychoanalysis.

    It is at this 'phallic' stage that the Oedipus complex emerges. Freud believed it was at this time that the male child starts to develop an unconscious sexual interest in his mother and hostility towards his father whom he sees as more powerful as himself.

  2. Sight Vs. Blindness in Oedipus: A Battle of Figurative and Literal Proportions

    However, both Oedipus and Iocasta are figuratively blind to the truths around them. Oedipus curses the murderer of Lauis, a man he never met, while never considering the identity of the man he himself killed. He professes to "defend [Lauis'] cause/ As if it were my father's" (263-264).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work