Portrayal of blindness in The Outsider and Oedipus the King

Authors Avatar

             Portrayal of blindness in The Outsider and Oedipus the King

A primitive motif in Oedipus the King by Sophocles and The Outsider by Albert Camus is blindness. The protagonists in the novels are blinded to a personal truth, and are physically blinded as well. In The Outsider, Meursault’s blindness is metaphorical, as he is negligent to his own absurdity, which he later becomes categorized as. On the other hand, Oedipus’s blindness is literal, as he is ignorant to the truth of his life; and the fact that he is incapable of escaping the destiny that the Gods have set out for him, which resulted in him gorging his eyes out. The characters suffer an emotional and physical blindness, which leads to tragic irony in Oedipus the King and existential irony in The Outsider. In both the novels, it is only towards the end that the two protagonists release themselves from their crudeness of the truth.  

The blindness that overcomes Meursault and Oedipus prevents them from seeing and understanding the lives that they are living. In Meursault’s case, he oblivious to his own absurdity, as he only comes to terms  with this ideology towards the end of the novel. As a student, he had ambitions; but as he came towards the end of his studies, he realized that “none of it really mattered”. At that instant, his vision became clouded, as he began to realize that he was not dissatisfied with his life. He is also blind towards the indifferent universe which he inhabits, which is ironic because he would eventually become an absurd hero of this society. If the circumstances were different and Meursault did actually discern the uncaring universe and its callousness towards his absurdity, he could perchance foreshadow where his indifference would lead him. Salamano and his dog is an example of this uncaring universe as the pair has lived in a state of misery for a couple of years, and the dog suffers from mange and is very poorly taken cared of. Salamano himself is not incomparable to his dog as he has “ended up looking like his dog with reddish scabs on his face and his hair is thin and yellow” (p.30). Salamano mistreats his dog and swears at it until it cringes in fear, to the point where they both “stop on the pavement and stare at each other, the dog in terror, the man in hatred” (pg.31).

Join now!

Ironically, Meursault is blind and disregardful towards their desolate world and never comments on how miserable and unfeeling their situation is.   Akin to Meursault, Oedipus is also blind towards accepting and understanding his life, and where he originated from. Astonishingly, given that Oedipus is given many hints that could lead him towards understanding his life,  he still fails to detect them.  The most distinct ironies in the two novels come from the blind prophet, as he is literally blind and yet he understands a great deal more than Oedipus, who was not physically blind at the time. Teiresias ...

This is a preview of the whole essay