• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The republic under Augustus

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How true do you consider Augustus, claim that in 28-27 BC he transferred the republic from his power to the dominion of the senate and people? After the battle of Actium at 31 BC, Augustus was put into a dilemma. Originally, the Second Triumvirate had the mission to restore the republic but now after the death of Mark Antony only one man was left in charge, a position in disagreement with the Roman tradition. The hatred of kings was painfully fresh in all minds, ever since Caesar's assassination. Thus, Augustus had to find a way to prevent any future civil wars but without usurping the leadership. In 28 BC he symbolically retired, knowing that the senate and people of Rome would beg for his return, and all this with the aim to differentiate him from the previous tyrants. ...read more.

Middle

Moreover, the word 'respublica' continued to be used as proven by public inscriptions praising the 'restoration'. Thus, Augustus would keep an eye on things, to exercise what Romans called a tutela or cura, a role of guardian or protector. Having one man with as much power as Augustus was in controversy with foundation of democracy. However, Rome was not a democracy of an Athenian type where everyone has an equal voice. Money and heritage were leading factors when running for elections and in this sense Augustus might have only transformed the oligarchy into autocracy. Actually, the construction of a new voting hall on Campus Martius presents evidence that Augustus restored the most important civil right of all - the right to vote. ...read more.

Conclusion

Thus, senate's decision to call him back was perfectly predictable. And it is true that Augustus did not hold all the responsibilities, but he had just enough to make himself almighty. The consular and subsequently the tribunician powers had the role to provide him with control within the city of Rome and the patronage over the legions gave him legal rights to govern the Empire. As seen in Res Gestae the soldiers had to swear an oath of allegiance not to Rome, as the tradition was, but to Augustus as he had 'imperium'. In this way Caesar's heir found a way to be a king outside the boundaries of the republican city of Rome. And because the First Settlement left a gap in this regime as seen from Marcus Primus' treachery, Augustus chose to add the word 'maius' towards his responsibilities and finally outwash the republican tradition. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Classics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Classics essays

  1. To what extent did the Roman emperor Augustus restore the republic?

    Another Republican tradition that was, in the Senate, the order of speaking was determined by the age of the Senator but under the rule of Augustus, it was he himself that spoke first and chose those who spoke in the Senate.

  2. According to the Res Gestae and Suetonius' Life of Augustus, how effective were Augustus' ...

    troops were more prepared for war and to keep peace in the provinces. As can be seen by the fact that the gates of the Temple of Janus were closed three times during Augustus' tenure, "The Temple of Janus Quirinus which had been closed no more than twice since the

  1. To what extent do the sources suggest that Rome had become ungovernable by the ...

    The want for power in this case caused some to be thought to murder others, therefore meaning that somewhere along the line, something had got too intense. The cursus honorum was meant to stop fighting for power (when in reality it has done the opposite)

  2. Was Julius Caesar an effective leader?

    Philip Freeman agrees with Plutarch on this point, and there is much corroboration between historians' on this. He aimed to achieve peace through negotiation rather than by force. Such as he did to the invading Germans until they broke dialogue with force.

  1. czech republic

    Coins are available in values of 1, 2, 5, 10, 20 and 50 crowns, as well as 50 hellers. Mountaines Almost all the main mountain regions are situated along the nation's borders. These mountains are named: the �umava, the Kru�n� Mountains, the Jizersk� Mountains, the Krkono�e with our highest mountain

  2. To what extent did the military reforms of Marius contribute to the collapse ...

    noted on the civil wars within the republic, observes, ?This was the first army of citizens to invade Rome as an enemy country. There were frequent attacks on Rome and battles for the walls, with no longer any sense of shame, whether for the laws, institutions or country, to restrain violence?.

  1. To what extent does the evidence support the view that Roman emperors paid very ...

    As well as supporting the view that disliked emperors could still administer the corn supply, this passage also serves as evidence that either Vespasian or Titus had changed the distribution in between years. This can be taken as a sign that either Vespasian or Titus paid more attention than Nero

  2. Do Augustan sources portray an accurate picture of the Battle of Actium?

    Horace?s emphasis on Eastern effeminacy further stresses that the Battle of Actium was a foreign war. Epode 9 must not, however, be taken at face value as Horace was employed by Octavian to write the poem; this means that Horace was obliged to write in such a way that pleased

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work