• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did the military reforms of Marius contribute to the collapse of the Roman Republic?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐To what extent did the military reforms of Marius contribute to the collapse of the Roman Republic? Following a series of foreign wars, the Roman army was depleted in numbers, strength and morale. The war with King Jugurtha of Numidia had dragged on for a number of years, resulting in military, political and economic discontent. In 107B.C, Gaius Marius, became consul of the Roman Republic, and promised to end the war that was draining the Roman treasury. During his consulship, Marius incorporated a number of military reforms. These affected the overall power and strength of the Roman Army, and undermined the Republican constitution. The military reforms of Gaius Marius had a significant contribution, both economically and politically, to the collapse of the Roman Republic by shifting the allegiance of the common soldier from the State to the generals. Further, the extraordinary nature of Marius? political career undermined the Senate and weakened the fabric of the Roman Republic. Marius? reforms, although achieved through economical and political means, were military in nature. ...read more.

Middle

The Marian reforms had far reaching political affects, one being Marius seven consulships. In spite of the fact that under the lex Villa Annalis he was ineligible for re-election to the consulship, he was voted in for a second time, whilst still absent in Africa, an illegality which is acknowledged by Plutarch [Life of Marius: 14], a biographer who personally appraised the virtues and reforms of Marius, who observes, ?it was illegal for a man to be elected consul unless he was actually present in Rome?. This significant move by Marius, and by the people of Rome, can be partially responsible for weakening and undermining the power of the senate, as well as the constitution of the Roman Republic. Not only that, while the war between the Germanic Tribes continued, so did Marius? consulships (Bradley, 1990: 273). This further weakened the power and fabric of the constitution, for Marius continued to be inabsentia (absent) from Rome, whilst the election for consulships was held, for consecutive years. ...read more.

Conclusion

After Sulla won the command against the Mithridatic War, Marius returned from Africa with an army, and unleashed a reign of havoc and bloodshed on the city of Rome. During this particular war, the ?fearful? Senate had no authority over the two generals, Marius and Sulla. It is clear that the military reforms of Gaius Marius had a significant contribution, both economically and politically, to the collapse of the Roman Republic by shifting the allegiance of the common soldier from the State to the generals. This shift can be held responsible for the establishment of personal armies and ultimately, the civil war between Marius and Sulla. Further, Marius? seven consulships can be held responsible for weakening the Roman constitution as well as undermining the power of the Senate. In addition, the reform that was associated with the eradication of the land requirement, in order to enlist within the army, placed a hefty burden on the Roman treasury, yet, significantly decreased the rate of unemployment within the Republic. Not only that, Marius, prepared the way for the victories of his more famous successors, Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus and Gaius Julius Caesar. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Classics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Classics essays

  1. To what extent did the Roman emperor Augustus restore the republic?

    tribunician powers which when coupled with the oath of allegiance to Augustus and his heirs in 33BC undermines significantly the traditions of the republic and would indeed suggest that he did not restore it.

  2. According to the Res Gestae and Suetonius' Life of Augustus, how effective were Augustus' ...

    However, it would also seem that he reformed the senate in such a way that would be beneficial to himself. As can be observed in Suetonius, the senatorial reforms were effective and disguised the fact that Augustus was in control well, for example, letting "each senator nominate one other" and then choosing who to rid of himself.

  1. In your opinion, where did the real power lie within the Spartan Constitution?

    One could argue that the position of King was the most powerful position in the Spartiate Constitution based on the fact that a monarch is normally exempt from the 'laws of the land' but, due to the presence of the Ephors, this conclusion is incorrect.

  2. Political success depended upon military success. To what extent do the sources support the ...

    He achieved to be elected consul 7 consecutive times due to being victorious and important army reforms that strongly appealed to the masses are attributed to him. He was the 1st to use army as political tool by creating a semi-professional, fresh and numerous army.

  1. How useful are the sources for our understanding of the significance of tribunes in ...

    his own lieutenants Pompey and Crassus reinstated the powers of the tribunes in their joined consulship - being the initiators of tribunitian power as predicted by Macer in his speech.

  2. To what extent do the sources suggest that Rome had become ungovernable by the ...

    The senate had no army to protect, and also because of Sulla's March on Rome, no army was allowed inside, rendering its streets open to this violence. Cicero's letter illustrates his fear and the instability of these actions - and there would seemingly be no reason to lie in a

  1. To what extent does the evidence support the view that Roman emperors paid very ...

    grain distribution for public banquets?, although this was a social innovation, which was rather unpopular with the Roman people, it did show that supply could be managed even by the most unpopular of emperors. Similarly, Suetonius writes that Domitian also ?cancelled the public grain issue, restored the custom of holding formal dinners??.

  2. Is Aeneas pious, and would the Romans of Augustan Rome have thought him to ...

    the Trojan women?s matter of flames, which are extinguished by the ?mind? (or fate) when Aeneas has to set sail shortly after the Funeral Games. The poet presents his audience with fire for passion, desire and pain which all represent destruction.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work