• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do the sources suggest that Rome had become ungovernable by the 50s BC

Extracts from this document...


To what extent do the sources suggest that Rome had become ungovernable by the 50s BC? Many issues in the late Republic left Rome liable to instability and shifts in power - mainly due to the rise of 'personal politics' and the reiterated division of the factions; optimates and populares. Roman society at this time was therefore under a lot of pressure due to such happenings of the Catiline Conspiracy (63 BC) alongside the road to Caesar's Civil Wars and Sallust's notion of decreasing dignitas within the Roman system, where old traditional Roman virtues were being replaced for the pursuit of power and wealth - perhaps leading from the 146 BC turning point at the destruction of Carthage, in which Rome first began acquiring a taste or such wealth and luxuries. The first triumvirate of Caesar, Crassus and Pompey shows the individual determination for success, wealth and glory - and even being prepared to overrule the senate to do so. Cicero displays an early hatred of this alliance, as he places himself with the optimates politicians and seems to speak for the values of the old Republic - upholding the position of the senate. His letters show distain for such an occurrence, but this hatred may simply be due to the fear of one man (or indeed several potential men) becoming too powerful, suggesting much caution was in the senate at this time, and the inability to directly stop it - showing helplessness and therefore that perhaps society was uncontrollable; at least for the more conservative Romans. ...read more.


In Sallust's Speech of Macer in his Histories contemplate the same issues; drawing in particularly the point of corruption of 146 BC in the destruction of Carthage to be the turning point of Rome - in which wealth began to seep into Rome. In this speech the early Republic is drawn out as high and supreme, perhaps even idolized, but from all aspects of history, we can know that there is never a time when a society balances perfectly, and if no Romans at all were corrupt at this time, there would be no change to the society. Sallust was a salient historian on the time, but was very focused on condescending the contemporary invaluable, temperamental corrupt politicians of the late Republic, leading up to the 50s BC. Even Livy, in Beginnings of Luxury shows Rome to be liable to corruption and influences from the East, especially Asia Minor - the wealthiest part of the Empire. Livy was born in 59 BC, so would've been writing slightly after these events, but still is a contemporary of the late republic. In other works of Sallust, the Jugurthine War epitomizes the view he had about corruption invading Rome, whist beginning to explain (again the troubles between the two factions) Marius and Sulla. Another key theme for the instability and uncontrollability of Rome would be the senate's power verses that of the popular assembly - and the shift between the senate's power as the advisory body, to practically having no role, other than that of appearance. ...read more.


and almost immediately switched sides upon hearing - further suggesting or even reflecting the instability of Rome at this time. Sallust however can be incredibly bias, and was not known to be present, but could be seen to have been trying to replicate the happenings as truthfully as possible. Cicero's letters during this period also reflect a degree of uncertainty and therefore again reiterating the uncertainty that would be to come. Ultimately, the shift in power and influence in Rome had distinctly focused on individuals (namely the generals of armies, patron/client system for support) rather than the traditional advisory body of the senate. The increase in 'people power' towards the Roman citizens had altered the system to become very distinct to that of the early republic - and possibly the loss of control was simply due to this change. The rise of individual political success may have underpinned some individual's life goals - but is due to a number of reasons, primarily in the new found use of personal armies, with generals turning their soldiers into clients. The sources however acknowledge the panic the Romans reflected in such times as the beginnings of the triumvirate, the Catiline Conspiracy and the lead up to Civil War - agreeing with the initial term of Rome becoming 'ungovernable' as the sources suggest too many political hopefuls were fighting for power at the expense of the Republic - although perhaps Caesar's later powers suggest it was an inevitable shift, and would have simply happened with time in any case. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Classics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Classics essays

  1. To what extent did Augustus use the building programme to beautify Rome.

    Augustus himself displays the orator's pose which highlights his supreme imperium and ability to command an army, the spear he holds too emphasises this ability due to the associations it brings with war and arms. The central image on the breastplate is that of the Parthian handing back the Roman

  2. To what extent does the architecture of Rome highlight the aims of the emperors?

    from the Jewish War and was filled with an array of books and treasures which the public could see and use. In contrast, some emperor's building programmes actually showed a lack of respect for the gods and show to us that it was not their aim to pay respect to the traditions and customs of Roman religion.

  1. Political success depended upon military success. To what extent do the sources support the ...

    Thus his speeches and letters must be evaluated accordingly, the former as being public knowledge, the latter as expressing his actions on a private, personal level. Sallust's dramatic descriptions are subjective and historically inaccurate, uniquely though contain historical analysis with Thusydidean realism instead of being chronological accounts.

  2. According to the Res Gestae and Suetonius' Life of Augustus, how effective were Augustus' ...

    Suetonius states that Augustus "allowed any township to nominate men capable of taking up such senior army posts as were reserved for the Equestrian Order." (Suetonius, Life of Augustus) This practice would imply that Augustus was a fair ruler and appointed men justly.

  1. To what extent was the battle of Salamis a turning point in Xerxes' campaign ...

    Rather than inspirational leadership comparing with Themistocles at Plataea, both Greek and Persian leadership was weak. Arguably it was mere chance that the Greeks defeated the Persian army. Indeed, Mardonius felt that there was little to be gained from the expedition and so simply waited for the Greek alliance to fall apart.

  2. In what ways and to what extent Does Herodotus overemphasize individuals in the conflict ...

    matters are men are to women? thus depicting her importance in a era were women were not of importance but her being not only an ?exception? but a woman of ?marvel? and great influence. Furthermore Themistocles where Herodotus is seen to underemphasize his importance in comparison to other individuals which

  1. To what extent does the evidence support the view that Roman emperors paid very ...

    role in the administration of the corn supply in Rome; Turranius was the first praefectus annonae (prefect of the corn supply) and held the position for over forty years. The praefectus annonae bore greater power in Rome than the Senate as he could directly change the way the Emperor was

  2. To what extent did the military reforms of Marius contribute to the collapse ...

    Marius returned to Rome for the consular elections, after successfully winning the war against the Germanic tribes. Nevertheless, it was the civil war between Marius and Sulla that had more significant political, as well as economical impacts. The civil war, between Marius and Sulla, had a significant impact towards the breakdown of the Roman Republic, politically and economically.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work