• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent does the evidence support the view that Roman emperors paid very little attention to the administration of the city of Rome between 31 BC-AD 96?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐To what extent does the evidence support the view that Roman emperors paid very little attention to the administration of the city of Rome between 31 BC-AD 96? (50)- Although there is evidence supporting the view that some of the Roman emperors paid very little attention to the administration of the city of Rome between 31 BC to AD 96, it is not substantial; nor does it suggest that all of the Roman emperors were equal in their actions to maintaining proper administration of the city of Rome. Indeed, the sources provide many clear distinctions between the diverse ways of ruling each emperor used. Every Roman emperor organised the City in different ways, with structures, boundaries and districts. Emperor Claudius extended the pomerium (sacred boundary) of Rome when he was in power, Augustus being the first to do so during his reign. This followed ?the ancient tradition whereby those who have expanded the empire are awarded the privilege of also extending the boundary of Rome? (Tact. Annals. 12.23). Claudius was the first emperor since Augustus to exercise this right, thus showing the people of Rome that he had a great respect for tradition and the rule of the defied Augustus. ...read more.

Middle

Tiberius. 48) but Tacitus accuses Nero of actually starting the Great Fire of AD 64 as an excuse to build himself a new palace. Although Tacitus does not outright say Nero did start the fire, he very much implies this with his phrasing of sentences such as ?whether it was accidental or caused by a criminal act on the part of the Emperor? and ?Nero profited by his country?s ruin to build a new palace?. It is difficult to dispute the accusation due to Nero?s history with criminal activity; however, it must be borne in mind that Tacitus was also the one to accuse Nero of such criminal activity and that Tacitus is renowned for taking out his anger towards Domitian (whose reign he lived under) on other Emperors throughout his writing and so is likely to have used this as a way of shunning Nero?s reign. On the other hand, it is known that Nero did indeed build himself a new palace in light of the fire as parts of it still stand today. Either way, Nero?s reaction to the fire was poor as he put his needs before his people?s; the building of the Domus Aurea (?Golden House?) ...read more.

Conclusion

Tacitus states that Nero dismissed any forms of ?bribery and favouritism? showing that he treated everyone as an equal. The evidence gives the impression that the emperors were very attentive towards the act of justice, again opposing the view that the Roman emperors paid very little attention to the administration of Rome. In conclusion, the weight of the evidence tends to primarily disagree with the view that the Roman emperors paid very little attention to the administration of the city of Rome, although it varies with each aspect of administration and each emperor. The general organisation of the city predominantly falls down to the work of Augustus and Claudius, whereas the corn supply was something that every single emperor focused on. Likewise, the act of justice bore just as great an importance to each emperor as the corn supply did. In contrast, the fires in Rome were dealt with very differently, with most emperors dealing with them very well and taking an active part in the rebuilding but some, for example, Nero, showing exceedingly selfish behaviour and a worrying lack of attention to the administration of the City. Out of all the emperors, Augustus and Claudius were the most consistent with their concern for the administration of the city, demonstrating attentive and focused behaviour and actions in every aspect of the City. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Classics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Classics essays

  1. To what extent did the Roman emperor Augustus restore the republic?

    a legal framework, they are not reflections of a citizen aiming to restore the Republic but rather those of an Emperor creating the mirage of the former. Augustus' relationship with the Senate and the powers he took away and changes he made to the institution can be used to determine whether or not he restored the roman republic.

  2. To what extent did Augustus use the building programme to beautify Rome.

    At the forum Augustum, Mars Ultor had a temple dedicated to him to show thanks for allowing him to avenge his father which emphasised both Augustus' pietas for the Gods and family. Augustus also stressed his pietas towards his family through constructing a temple for Vesta, Lares and Penates.

  1. Were coins used in the Roman Empire more for propaganda purposes or as a ...

    The reverse side of these coins where this information was portrayed can be backed up by literary texts, one by Suetonius and the other Tacitus. The depiction of Poppea on Nero's coin shows that Nero wanted to announce to his people that he had married this woman.

  2. Political success depended upon military success. To what extent do the sources support the ...

    Thus his speeches and letters must be evaluated accordingly, the former as being public knowledge, the latter as expressing his actions on a private, personal level. Sallust's dramatic descriptions are subjective and historically inaccurate, uniquely though contain historical analysis with Thusydidean realism instead of being chronological accounts.

  1. How useful are the sources for our understanding of the significance of tribunes in ...

    Although tribunes never intended to bring about revolution the Gracchi showed how the office could be used as an instrument of change. It was the Gracchi that made the tribunitian powers the most important asset for the Populares movement to control because as Plutarch notes: Gaius Gracchus 'to a certain

  2. To what extent and for what reasons did Augustus resist the creation of an ...

    Temple to Divus Augustus is shown on the Denarius of AD 158. Moreover, Suetonius?s Life of Augustus shows us ways in which, rather than being an innovator of a new imperial cult, Augustus actually restored traditional religious practices. By appearing to ?buy into? the conservatism of Roman religion, Augustus would

  1. Is Aeneas pious, and would the Romans of Augustan Rome have thought him to ...

    there was an extra tax placed on unmarried men above the age of 30. Aeneas demonstrates an incredible sense of duty to his people, community and fatherland right from the beginning of the poem. After the storm induced by Juno and Aeolus, and Aeneas and his men are rescued by

  2. To what extent did the military reforms of Marius contribute to the collapse ...

    noted on the civil wars within the republic, observes, ?This was the first army of citizens to invade Rome as an enemy country. There were frequent attacks on Rome and battles for the walls, with no longer any sense of shame, whether for the laws, institutions or country, to restrain violence?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work