Wanting Something You can't have: Babylonrevisited vs. A Rose for Emily.

Authors Avatar

Osa Erhunmwunsee                                                                April 5, 2003

Hoffman: CompLit

Paper 2:  Babylon Revisited vs. A Rose for Emily

Wanting Something You can’t have: Babylon revisited vs. A Rose for Emily

There are many similarities and differences between the two main characters in the short stories “Babylon Revisited” and “A Rose for Emily”. In this paper I will compare and contrast the main characters’ situations in each story. I will first tell the differences between the plots and what each character is striving to achieve. I will conclude by relating the similarities and differences between both characters wanting something they can’t have.

The main character in “Babylon Revisited”, Charlie Wales, has come to Paris to try to get custody of his daughter Honoria from his late wife's sister Marion, to whom the child was entrusted after Charlie fell apart several years before due to alcoholism. In order to get Honoria back, he needs to present a facade of being much more "whole" than he really is. He is fully aware of the split between the “fantasy” he has created due to once being an alcoholic and the reality he now lives due to being sober. Charlie is now sincerely trying to re-invent himself and wants a chance at caring for his daughter.  Nonetheless, this is a world his sister-in-law, Marion, would never be able to understand. Marion definitely has no time for Charlie, and one can see that her animosity stems from the time when he and her sister Helen were having marital problems. She refers to an incident when Charlie locked Helen out of the house in the snow, apparently a relatively short time before Helen’s death. “When she was dying she asked me to look out for Honoria. If you hadn’t been in a sanitarium then, it might have helped matters,” Marion stated (page 386).  Although there is no real medical connection between the snow incident and Helen’s heart attack, Marion still connects the two events in her mind because they occurred about the same time, and unjustifiably holds Charlie responsible for the death of his wife. Since Marion sees her dead sister as a victim, she sees Charlie as the villain. The possibility that Helen could have played an active part in the breakup of their marriage never crosses Marion's mind. Now, Charlie has to prove himself to Marion in order to get what he wants, his child and her love. “I’m able to give her certain advantages now. I’m going to take a French governess to Prague with me. I’ve got a lease on a new apartment,” Charlie proclaimed (page 386).

Join now!

In “A Rose for Emily”, Emily Grierson, an aging spinster in Jefferson whose death and funeral drew the attention of the entire town, the narrator, which is considered "the town” and town gossip, conveys key moments in Emily's life, including the death of her father and a brief romance with a Yankee road paver, Homer Barron.  The house she lives in smells rotten of dust and disuse. Emily is alone in the house, which represents her being alone in the “old south” and never wanting change.  If Homer had triumphed in seducing Emily and deserting her, Emily would have become ...

This is a preview of the whole essay