Were coins used in the Roman Empire more for propaganda purposes or as a monetary means? Examples of how coins were used during Neros reign and how some literary sources link to them.

Authors Avatar

Were coins used in the Roman Empire more for propaganda purposes or as a monetary means?   Examples of how coins were used during Nero’s reign and how some literary sources link to them.

Coins have been around since about 4000 BC and have been used for many purposes.  Generally we think of coins as a monetary means of paying for goods or services, but this has not always been their use.  Coins have been used in the past for propaganda uses and as a sign of status.  Their use for propaganda was very widespread and important throughout the era of the Roman Republic and the Empire.  One main reason for this widespread use of coins for propaganda was the extensive land that the Romans came to dominate in their growing empire.  This meant that Roman rulers could not visit or be directly known to all of the subject inhabitants.  With this problem the emperors had to find another way of promoting and advertising all of the great successes that they had.  One method of doing this was through coins, where the reverse side was minted with a sign of the emperor’s achievements.  These achievements included famous victories in battle or personal events such as marriages within the imperial family.  

Coins minted in the time of the Emperor Nero, the fifth and last of the Julio-Claudian emperors who ruled from 54 to 68 AD, are a key example of the use of propaganda.  If we examine some of his coins we can get a sense of his power and how he was portrayed.  Many of his coins show that he liked to be portrayed as powerful, as he is depicted wearing his armour, showing his importance as a figure in battle.  This follows the tradition of the past where famous generals of the Republic and the first of the emperors, Augustus are commonly shown in military pose. Many other coins show pictures of his achievements or items that were important to him, one being his marriage to Poppaea.  The reverse side of these coins where this information was portrayed can be backed up by literary texts, one by Suetonius and the other Tacitus.

The depiction of Poppea on Nero’s coin shows that Nero wanted to announce to his people that he had married this woman.  The way that they are both facing to the right symbolises that they are of equal status.  Poppaea was Nero’s second wife, as he divorced Octavia to marry her.  The family of Nero disliked her, as they wrote ‘Octavia all over her statues and overturnedthem’,    most of them rioted.  The riot did not stop until Nero ordered ‘troops to club them’.  When Nero had divorced her, and then married Agrippina, Poppaea was not happy, so she had her head to be cut off, and ‘taken to Poppaea to see’.

Join now!

An early coin of the period of Nero depicts only his head and little on the back, only showing brief pieces of information about him.  One of the coins that I have found shows just this, where only his head and the initials of S C with a wreath around are shown.  This tells me a lot about the character of Nero.  It shows that he is not well known and needs to promote his qualities to his people.  The wreath on the coin shows that he is the top priest of the college of augurs.  This ...

This is a preview of the whole essay