• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Choose one live production you have seen and which you particularly enjoyed and discuss the aspects which made it so successful - Caucasian Chalk Circle

Extracts from this document...


Choose one live production you have seen and which you particularly enjoyed and discuss the aspects which made it so successful The production of the Frank McGuinness version of Caucasian Chalk Circle at the National Theatre on the 20th March 2007 by Filter Theatre was, in my opinion, a very successful and effective piece of theatre. The characters of Azdak and The Fat Prince were particularly entertaining and well-acted characters, and the use of special effects in the piece was also most interesting. Costume was also a significant contributory factor. The actor playing Azdak characterised a lazy, sloth-like person very well, and presented a very plausible character to the audience. His contribution to the overall success of the piece was key, as his comic timing and showmanship really drew the audience in. He was the most entertaining character within the entire piece by far, and he brought the standard of the piece up considerably. His colloquial and common speech was very befitting to his character, and was carried off very well. He was consistent in his accent, without faltering or losing it at any point. ...read more.


These little touches were present throughout the piece, and really gave Azdak's character a personality and really established a rapport with the audience, despite the clearly corrupt nature of the character. The Fat Prince was a character who needed to be despised by the audience for the role to properly suit the play. He was a very clearly upper-class, commanding, authoritative character. In order to characterise the feeling of superiority that the character was expected to express toward other characters, the actor had to do a number of things. One was to stride with confidence, acting self-important. The actor did this by taking large, slow, heavy strides around the stage, and making only small and dismissive hand gestures. By doing this with his gestures, and allowing his pitch to trail off in speech, he was demeaning to the other characters. He spoke loudly, clearly, and with a stereotypically 'posh' British accent. He conveyed an almost childlike glee in issuing orders most would consider villainous, and this made the audience even less sympathetic toward him, which was the desired effect. The role of costume in the piece added humour, in particular regarding the aforementioned characters, Azdak and the Fat Prince. ...read more.


A good example of where special effects really added to the performance was where Grusha had to give the peasant, Jussup, a bath. The actor of Jussup was in a bath onstage, however there was no water in the bath. Instead, each time Jussup moved, the actor who played the Fat Prince, who was crouched downstage-right, would pour water form a jug into a bucket. This was all onstage, and done up to a microphone so that the audience could hear it. This was of course an example of Brechtian Theatre, so was true to form. This was an interesting and skilfully implemented effect, which enhanced the production both in keeping to form and also adding interest for the audience. The sound of the water was also dramatic, and highlighted the tense atmosphere between Grusha and Jussup. Overall, therefore, the production was a great success, the most notable contributors being the actors of Azdak and the Fat Prince, the role of costume, and the very Brechtian special effects implemented. The examples outlined above are the moments which really displayed these strengths well, but are by no means the only effective moments in the play. The play as a whole was entertaining, intriguing and effective, keeping true to Brechtian form. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Theatre Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Theatre Studies essays

  1. "How Does The 'The Caucasian Chalk Circle' Fit Into Brecht's Idea Of 'Epic Theatre'?"

    Brecht shows that the "upper class" are selfish and only thing about themselves, and the "poorer class" are caring and thing about other people, Brecht shows this through Natella Abashvilli, when her husband is being prosecuted, she escapes from the city and forgets her child, she only cared for her clothes and not her child, she says, "Maro!

  2. The Devising Process

    I kept my focus very internal as if too terrified to look out; momentarily looking dreamily out as if picturing the horror again and only confronting the audience with key lines such as: 'When my Mother died, he turned to me and said: 'Isabelle, it's just you and me now'.

  1. The Caucasian Chalk Circle - Exploration Notes

    thinkers, which would have encouraged him to develop his own philosophical and political ideas. He also read much of Luther's German translation of the Bible at a young age, which he often references throughout his works. He also later studied Chinese, Japanese and Indian theatre, focused heavily on Shakespeare and other Elizabethans, and was fascinated by Greek tragedy.

  2. Outline and assess what you consider to be the most important aspects of one ...

    It requires the actor to open their emotional library and thus should not be treated lightly. It is an intensely personal activity that can take time; therefore it should be considered a private technique. The actor will get better results if they work on it unaided.

  1. Caucasian Chalk Circle - Language

    The oath was broken. Why? That was not told. Hear what she thought, But didn't say. This causes the audience to think about the characters previous actions and the consequences they face because of those actions, all without becoming too attached and involved with their emotions, as he wanted the audience to sit back and judge the characters for

  2. How do you think that Peter Brook has employed the ideas/techniques of the practitioners ...

    Brook does not refer to Stanislavsky as often as I expected in both The Shifting Point and The Empty Space, whereas Mitter's first chapter in his book shows immense comparison between Stanislavsky and Brook. "Like Stanislavsky, Brook believes that the entire corpus of objectively available material on the character...is insufficient.

  1. Evaluation of Live Theatre Performance, Case-Study: 'Bouncers' by John Godber.

    The men also were of varying characters. Through all the fast-paced action, however, the play held a deep underlying message that was not lost out in all the humour. It was a message showing how hopeless and bleak people's lives could become.

  2. Evaluation of a Theatrical Production - 'Too Much Punch For Judy' By Mark Wheellers.

    She played on everyone's emotions, which made her performance even better. The actors changed their costumes to show that they had changed characters, For example, Joanna who wore an open cardigan with her hair tied back, also played her mother.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work