• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare the interpretation of two film versions of Shakespeare's 'Romeo and Juliet.' Analyse, review and comment on how the directors Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann use cinematic techniques to convey particular meaning to the audience.

Extracts from this document...


Compare the interpretation of two film versions of Shakespeare's 'Romeo and Juliet.' Analyse, review and comment on how the directors Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann use cinematic techniques to convey particular meaning to the audience. Having studied the openings of two film versions, the two directors Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann, show they interpret the play differently because of the way they see different meanings in them. By interpreting the play differently, it also means the audience pick up a different meaning. Every image seen in the beginning decides whether the audience should continue with watching the film. But what makes a film so engaging? Every image and sound is chosen deliberately by the director to signify specific things. Looking further into this, comparing both Zeffirelli and Luhrmanns introduction, we can see the different uses of cinematic technique used, and the particular meaning that comes across from it. I can already see from the introduction to the film that Baz Luhrmann is an adventurous director. He uses different cinematic techniques and although the genre of the play is a romantic, Luhrmann displays it as a traumatic story. However, from Zeffirellis', it is more traditional, filmed using the original costumes and settings as at the time of when the play was being written. From seeing this, I can now look into more detail at how this idea has come across to me. Both sets of the film versions begin with the prologue, which sets the scene of the play, in this case, the film. ...read more.


The difference is seen between the two houses by the clothes that they are wearing. The Capulets are wearing dark, Mexican kind of clothes whereas the Montagues are wearing brightly coloured Hawaiian shirts, which add to their foolish personalities. This is the idea given to me when the Montagues seem a lot more scared when they enter. The lead up to the fight takes quite a while because it goes into great detail as it introduces it. When Benvolio enters again, when the fight is about to start, he seems a lot more powerful than the other Montague boys, as if he is the leader, but then again so does Tybalt when he enters very calmly, lighting a cigarette. It would look rather odd if they entered in the fighting scene with swords in a modern film, which meant that it was very clever and interesting how the director used guns, naming them swords. For example when Benvolio enters, it zooms in on the gun that he has which engraved upon it are the words '9mm gun'. When Benvolio says, 'I do but keep the peace, put up thy sword or manage to part these men away with me' it makes him seem scared, as though he does not want to fight, but to have peace. But Tybalt does want to fight when he replies how he hates the word peace. As he is saying this, I have noticed that they zoom in on the characters faces, preferably where the eyes are to show the emotion from it. ...read more.


This would have taken only one shot when it was being filmed because of the way that the people destroyed the set. When the prince enters, he is the actual prince to the country, unlike in Luhrmann where he is the chief police. Because of this comparison, the prince seems much powerful and high up, as he enters in wealthy clothes and on horseback. He speaks out his lines to everyone in the market square whereas in Luhrmann it is much more enclosed as he tells it to them face to face. There aren't as many camera techniques used in the Zeffirelli version because of at the time this was made, technology wasn't as good as what it was at the time of the making of Luhrmanns film. But this has a good effect because some areas of the audience would prefer this; the older area of them would, so therefore the target audience would be more the adults. But with all the camera techniques involved in Luhrmanns very engaging film, the target audience is much more younger, (which is why I feel that the Luhrmann version was more appealing to me and was more engaging.) this is also because of the characters involved. With Leonardo Di Caprio involved, it got more of the audience members wanting to watch Luhrmanns version, therefore proving that the type of people chosen to play each character is very important. Both films have their advantages and disadvantages; they are both engaging in different ways and had different meanings that have come across from each of them. But because they are so completely different, it clearly shows how the directors' interpretation of the play was different and showed throughout the film. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Plays section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Plays essays

  1. How does the director of "Shrek" use different techniques to establish the heroes and ...

    she is disappointed as she was expecting "Prince Charming". This makes the audience think of her as posh and stubborn but does not yet set her as a villan or a heroine. The events of the plot create sympathy for the three heroes and make us dislike the villan, Lord Farquaad.

  2. Drama Portfolio - Too much Punch For Judy

    It makes you aware of the consequences of drink driving. Drama lessons give us a chance to study it in such depth; we were able to use various explorative strategies to help us. We were able to create scenes and put ourselves in main characters situations in the play.

  1. The Film 'The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert' is concerned with journeys. ...

    The crowd are grateful to have them and there is a good atmosphere. Elliott deliberately shows the crowd to demonstrate the acceptance of Felicia and Mitzi. The music is happy and shows how Mitzi and Felicia feel. The main reason Felicia comes on the trip is to complete his dream to climb King's Canyon in a frock.

  2. The stimulus we were given to look at was the play 'Too Much Punch ...

    In this piece I played Duncan and also a person in a freeze frame, reacting to the crash. When playing Duncan I used a both worried and shocked voice to show how shaken he would have been when looking out onto the crash and realising it was up to him to go out and assist to Jo and Judy.

  1. The Truman Show And Pleasantville Review

    Pleasantville highlights some of the issues from the 50's like racism and some moral issues. Both films were directed skilfully and the costumes were well researched, and both images of the 'perfect world' were set out marvellously. And of course the acting cast were superb showing emotions and ambition.

  2. Too much punch for Judy.

    This gave the piece more of an edge. Freeze Frames and Role Play Week 6 we did 3 freeze frames as a whole group to show the story of the play but this time we were all together so it was quite difficult, we were told through out the lesson that we did we were to imagine we

  1. Miss Saigon - review.

    Sound effect of wind. > Lots of eye contact, creates them to be very close. > Quiet music begins to play, and suddenly mood changes, the boys slow down and become cautious, examining the structure. The Drain leading to the Warehouse: > Begin to argue about braking into the warehouse, their voices grow louder into a crescendo.

  2. What means does Alan Bennett use to help us to understand the truth about ...

    She usually insults men after they have tricked her. G�nter is an exception, now she feels wanted by someone, she is nice to them. Lesley is so unintelligent that she fails to see what G�nter is doing to her. Bennett has shown us here that Lesley will do anything if complemented.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work