Discuss what problems are presented in the plays and in what ways the playwrights attempted to compel the audiences to think for themselves about the problems.
“The successful dramatist knows, instinctively as well as consciously, that what matters is the posing of a problem in a way which will compel the audience to think for themselves.”
Discuss what problems are presented in the plays and in what ways the playwrights attempted to compel the audiences to think for themselves about the problems.
ESSAY A
“The successful dramatist knows, instinctively as well as consciously, that what matters is the posing of a problem in a way which will compel the audience to think for themselves.” This quote reflects the reason that Tennessee Williams’ play A Streetcar Named Desire and Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman both enjoyed the success that they did in their respective time periods. Both plays compel the audience to think for themselves, rather than telling them what to think by placing the characters in specific moral or social confines. Williams and Miller both encourage audiences to think for themselves and develop personal interpretations of each play by the use of a non-traditional protagonist, ambiguity, and a connection of mood with plot structure.
The non-traditional protagonist helps create what Miller himself called “the tragedy of the common man.” Unlike tragedies (like William Shakespeare’s Hamlet) essentially focused on the actions of noble characters; Willy Loman and Blanche Dubois both have strikingly ordinary backgrounds. Willy Loman works in New England (“I am vital to New England”), and Blanche Dubois lives out the actions of A Streetcar Named Desire in New Orleans. Both characters come from middle class (or upper middle class in Blanche’s case) homes and have, superficially, relatively stable family lives. The “ordinary” nature of these characters creates characters that are more understandable to the audience. Willy’s frustration with his career and Blanche’s dissatisfaction with her appearance allow the audience to share in the emotions of the characters more easily. The manner in which each playwright manages to first create the “common man” and then engineer his or her downfall is thus more likely to stir the audience to an awareness of a potential similar downfall or moral failing within themselves. In this way Miller and Williams manage to provide the audience with a way not only to think for themselves but also about themselves.