• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

elizabethan times theatre history

Extracts from this document...


Year 10 Coursework How important was the Theatre in Elizabethan Times? 1. One reason the theatre was seen to be a danger was because it was a place where lots of dangerous people could come together. In Source D it says "they are ordinary places for vagrant person, master less men...and other dangerous persons to meet in one place." This was a threat because those people were all together in one place and could plot crimes and steal from people in the crowds as there were lots of people there and no one would notice anything. The city was not able to stop these crimes as the theatre was "out of the city's jurisdiction" which meant that those crimes were unpunished. Those people also stayed unemployed as they spent their time going to the theatre and others were distracted from their jobs: in source D it says "draw apprentices and other servant from their ordinary works." therefore employers felt that the theatre was a threat as it preoccupied their employees so they couldn't do their jobs properly. In Source D, there were many "whoremongers" who could persuade you into paying them and doing bad deeds. There were "thieves" who are very capable of stealing off anyone because the people are so tightly packed. This was a huge threat because it was an easy place for crime to happen. In addition, source D also says there were "contrivers of treason" and these people plot against the Queen. The theatre is a perfect place to plot against her and get her overthrown because nobody would find out what they are planning. So this is a threat to The Queen. In Source D it also mentions that the people tend to go to theatre rather than the church, "They maintain idleness in such persons as have no vocations, and draw apprentices and other servants from their ordinary works..." ...read more.


the top with cushions, which the poor people could not afford and therefore had to stand at the bottom and they all went in through different doors to get into the different class seats, so therefore the poor only saw the rich sitting at the top from the bottom and therefore did not get to interact with each other. Overall there is some evidence to show that the theatre acted as a social leveller because everyone came together in one big place and watched the same show. The fact that the Queen approved of it and that poor people went to it; it meant that it was a place that everyone went to. However, although they all sat together it was still not much of a social leveller because the poor and rich people sat separately and went in through different entrances because they all paid different prices to sit in different seats. 5. Many people criticized and disapproved of the Elizabethan theatre. This was because they felt that it was ungodly and an extravagant wastefulness as said in Source G "a continual monument of London's prodigality and folly." And it was also a place where all kinds of dangerous people went to as said in Source D "places for vagrant persons, masterless men...and dangerous persons to meet." and could discuss plots against the Queen and would not be noticed. It was also disapproved because it used to "draw apprentices and other servants from their ordinary works" as said in Source D so work didn't get done because the servants were in the theatre. Another reason why the theatre was disapproved was because unemployed people did not spend the time to find work and "maintained idleness in such persons". The theatre was also disapproved because it spread the plague as lots of people came together in one big place. We know this from source E as it says that the theatres had to be closed down because of the plague. ...read more.


However there were also other threats to Elizabeth and Elizabethan England. These included poverty and begging and the Spanish Armada, Begging and poverty was one of the threats to Elizabethan England. This was because lots of people were unemployed which meant that they didn't have enough money to support their families. This was a threat to England as it meant that lots of people were living in very poor conditions, so this helped spread the plague as people didn't have enough money for medicine and sanitation and therefore the theatre was not entirely a threat to England because of the plague. Another important threat to Elizabethan England was the Spanish Armada. This was a big threat to England because King Phillip of Spain was Catholic and wanted to turn England Catholic, so England was in threat because the official religion would have been changed again from Protestant to Catholic which would have caused riots and rebellion. However England had more advanced ships than Spain, so Spain wouldn't have been able to take over England so King Phillip joined forces with Mary Queen of Scots who also wanted England to be Catholic. England was now in threat of being taken over by the Spanish Armada and Queen Elizabeth was in threat of being captured by Spain or Mary Queen of Scots and assassinated. So Elizabeth was not as in much threat from assassination by the dangerous people in the theatre as from Mary Queen of Scots and the Spanish Armada. In conclusion, I think the theatre was a bit of a threat and the statement is somewhat true. I think this because the theatre spread the plague as lots of people came together in one place it caused bad behaviour and distracted people from their work. On the other hand, there were other more important threats to Elizabeth and Elizabethan England such as the Spanish Armada, Mary Queen of Scots and poverty and begging in England which were not caused by the theatre. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Theatre Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Theatre Studies essays

  1. Compare the ancient theatres with theatres today!

    For example there are now microphones in theatres, which are as small as a tiny dot. There are also a lot of electronically powered devices such as the music. There are also sound effects which are quite effective-these are normally mimed on stage.

  2. Summary Sheffield Theatre Trust.

    This change meant that the Crucible was no longer in direct competition for funds with as many other theatres as previously, but it also meant that the scope for Arts Council grants was influenced heavily by the initial split of the 'cake' into regional 'slices' over which the theatre had relatively little influence.

  1. A2 theatre studies portfolio

    However as a group we struggled to find a political message that could be expressed via Brechtian methods, as there wasn't really a message other than good always prevails. We wanted something with a bit more substance and relevance. In addition, although there were five parts for acting, it transpired

  2. Metamorphosis - Plot and Subplot

    Samsa has got a job, and Optimism is seen in the family for the first time since Gregor's transformation. Through out the beginning of this scene, the attention is on the father and the family is starting to get on with their lives, which makes the presence of Gregor, become oppressive.

  1. AS Theatre Studies Portfolio

    The transitions were useful too as the audience could see the set being changed and it was the characters who moved props, no major props were used that were not part of the set all the way through and this is essentially what we have to do as it is

  2. Musical Theatre Report

    The musicals today have not been created to the such wonderful performances there once was, some of the best writers and composers are no longer with us and certain few people just have this spark such the parallel novel by Gregory Maguire who created the musical Wicked.

  1. 20th century innovators of theatre

    For without them the performance is not actually possible. 'The real performance, the real event is the gathering.' Staniewski's company wished to change the passive audience into the active one through the constant evoking of their senses. He did this through his deeply moving performances, which involved music and song, this musical song was used in a very ritualistic way.

  2. Why was Elizabethan theatre so successful?

    This meant that encouragement was given to the poor to go to the theatre which increased its attendance and popularity. An attraction to the theatre was its cheap entry cost, for groundlings it only cost 1 penny, this meant that it was accessible to even the poorest Elizabethans.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work