Having Watched Gus Van Sant's Remake of Alfred Hitchcock's Film Psycho Analyse How Van Sant makes the Shower Scene Effective.

Authors Avatar

Having Watched Gus Van Sant’s Remake of Alfred Hitchcock’s Film Psycho Analyse How Van Sant makes the Shower Scene Effective.

        When asked what they remember from the original Psycho, most people would say that the shower scene was the part of the film that they remembered most. In this essay I will be analysing this famous scene but from the remake directed by Gus Van Sant.

        The remake of the film, created in the nineteen ninety’s, has many differences from the sixties version. This is advantageous to the production. Examples of this are the use of colour and modern camera techniques that can be used to create tension, fear, anxiety, and psychological horror. A result of the use of modern camera techniques is that the director can diversify the camera shots which allows the audience to seemingly see through Marian Crane’s eyes and allows the audience to seemingly see through the eyes of an unseen voyeur. This diversity, which is used throughout the film, creates atmospheres of tension and at parts makes the viewer feel intrusive; this is achieved as a part of the modern usage of the cameras was that they could show intimacy within the shots.

        Gus Van Sant directs the cameras in was to create certain effects. He does this throughout the film to make the audience nervous and in the shower scene he uses the cameras to maximum effect to make the audience feel extremely uncomfortable, involved with the character, intrusive and at points terrified. Gus Van Sant uses these methods (of directing by using different shots) to make the viewer feel as though they are looking through Marian Crane’s eyes, the murderers eyes and also eyes of an unwilling and unseen witness to the event.

        At the beginning of the film Van Sant uses the unseen voyeur to forcefully make the audience intrude on Marian Crane, making them uncomfortable and uneasy. The viewer is almost made to feel involved with Marian Crane’s theft as they have followed her from her work, to where she traded her car and finally to the motel room where the audience watch her work out how to repay the money she spent on the car. This uneasiness is also caused by the fact that Marian is in her dressing gown and in her bedroom. This makes the audience feel intrusive and involved, they are also aware of the vulnerability of Marian at this point in the film.

        The audience watch her tare up the paper which is used to write her repayment sums on, which, to the audience is seen as evidence of her crime and if it was found she would be caught. This representation of her crime is presented to the audience as it illustrates evidence of her crime which again implements the audience in her criminal activities because they have witnessed the crime and the evidence. This makes the audience feel almost guilty but also anxious to be so involved with Marian and the emotions are magnified as the audience empathise with her.

Join now!

        Marian Crane gets up out of her chair as she destroys the evidence but instead of moving to another shot Van Sant uses the same camera to pan across the room and follow her. The camera shows a shot that encroaches on Marian as it is very close to her all of the time. It is intended to make the viewer feel very uncomfortable as they see the whole thing through the eyes of the unseen voyeur; however the shots associated with the unseen voyeur have usually been in Marian’s car during her journey to the motel. The voyeuristic style ...

This is a preview of the whole essay