• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Peter Shafer uses 'Equus' to portray religion

Extracts from this document...


How Peter Shafer uses 'Equus' to portray religion The book Equus, gives its audience a deeper view on religion by relating it to a series of scenes in the play. Religion as a whole is mainly a person's belief and what they do in life depends on this belief. If, within a religion, a person is told that something is the right thing to do then that person will try in as many ways as possible to live up to this. Religion can mean anything anyone wants it to mean and be anything they make it. It does not have to be believed in by many people, it can be a personal belief of one person. 'Equus' proves that religion can be anything. Alan, one of the main characters of this play, finds belief in horses. He worships them, just as many people worship God, Allah and Buddha. He has strong feelings for them and spends as much time with them as possible. Much the same as strong Christians do when at church. But as the play goes on, he starts to feel more than a spiritual love for them and becomes sexually attracted to them as well. He has such an overwhelming passion for them that he spends all the time he can with them. We learn that the main causes of his actions in the play are caused by his parents. ...read more.


Frank could never understand the importance of the Bible or of any religious beliefs of any sort. When Alan was younger he had not thought twice about the stories because he didn't see them as a problem but now he is sure it is because of them. Equus therefore leaves a lot of unanswered questions which keep the audience interested in the play and makes them want to find out the answers. Alan's relationship with Dysart Alan is sent to see a psychiatrist who happens to be Martin Dysart. Alan starts off by only answering Dysart with songs and jingles from adverts. But soon he begins to open up fully and truthfully to Dysart and they begin to become friends. Not only does Alan start to talk about himself and his past but he also analyses Dysart too. He tells Dysart that if he asks a question then Alan will ask him one in return. Alan then starts to feel more comfortable with Dysart and shares everything with him. By the end of the play they are very close but at the beginning this would not have seemed possible Dysart begins to realise that Alan is not just another patient. He begins to envy him and starts to question himself. Dysart starts his therapy with Alan by asking him typical psychiatrist questions which trick Alan into saying things he would normally refuse to tell ...read more.


How he reacts to Dysart's questions in scene 3 onwards, gives the audience the impression that Dysart and Alan are 2 very different people, and that gives the audience the impression that they Dysart and Alan will never properly understand each other, and may never have anymore of a relationship than what they started of with. Dysart pushed the relationship because he was being paid for it, but once they got closer and began to understand each other, and then they both made an effort because they wanted to and not because they had to. Without Dysart making Alan think that he wanted to talk to him and get to know him, Alan may not have trusted Dysart the way he did and then nothing would have been achieved, but in the end they made their relationship work because they wanted to, which showed that they both genuinely y wanted to share their feelings and emotions. So in the end, Alan and Dysart had developed a relationship based on trust and honesty, and that was extremely unexpected, and was a big shock to the audience of the play and the viewers of the film. But they connected with each other and felt they could talk and open up their hearts and souls, which in the end helped them both. ?? ?? ?? ?? Phillippa McElroy 10p ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Plays section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Plays essays

  1. Too much punch for Judy.

    The group with Nick, Becky, Ashley, Monica and Jason in was quite good. I liked the way Nick picked Becky up out of the car trying to make sure she couldn't see the car. That was a very strong image, but I didn't really like the fact that Monica was sitting back in the chair the whole time.

  2. What means does Alan Bennett use to help us to understand the truth about ...

    When we encounter Lesley getting a part in a pornographic, we are just bewildered; this was not what we were expecting after reading this opening about a cold-blooded murder. As we read further on we find out the truth, and the opening reveals some of Lesley's hidden characteristics.

  1. How does the Audience Respond to Miss Ruddock in Alan Bennett's A Lady of ...

    she tries to make herself look important and interesting by saying that she is an atheist. "They don't expect you to be an atheist when you are a miss." In this section Bennett is trying to tell the audience that old and lonely people like Miss.

  2. How does Peter Medak gain the viewers sympathy for Derek Bentley in the film ...

    Medak shows the controversy that the phrase 'Let him have it,Chris' caused when in Bentley's defence that it could have meant anything. The camera doing close ups in this scene show how vulnerable he is when being questioned. Medak shows the Judge being personally against Derek for example when he

  1. How does Peter Medak gain the viewers sympathy for Derek Bentley in the film ...

    This is one example of Peter Medak been bias in this film because he is showing us Derek's situation because he wants to make us feel the sympathy towards Derek because of his epilepsy. As a year goes pasts, Derek will only leave the house as far as his own back garden.

  2. Discuss How You Would Direct Two Key Scenes in Whose Life Is It Anyway?

    After Ken delivers his response, Mrs. Boyle concedes to his argument but swiftly seeks to regain her stance by slipping into the situation from another angle, 'What did you do before the accident?' Ken equally dislikes this counteraction because by choosing this option, Mrs. Boyle can avoid intellectual confrontation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work