• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Play What I Wrote - Evaluation.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

James Pearson 11h The Play What I Wrote - Evaluation "The Play What I Wrote" was a collection of sketches/anecdotes based around the theme of an old Morecambe and Wise show. The show used a wide range of props, scenery and physical humour to achieve what it set out to do. However, I felt that it relied to heavily on the physical aspects of the script to get easy laughs instead of making people laugh with words. The overall style of the play was a comedy but was far from the alternative comedy that is thought to be funny in my society, culture and above all generation. The target and capacity audience that were at the Theatre Royal were all at least old enough to go on a scrabble holiday with Saga, a generation that will have remembered Morecambe and Wise well and could relate to the play. Because the play was essentially a Morecambe and Wise cover show it failed to shake off the nostalgic feeling that it could've easily disguised. The actors were clearly very inspired by the famous comedy duo but this was far too evident throughout. ...read more.

Middle

Comedy now is about observing everyday situations, laughing at ourselves and exaggerating possibilities into the surreal and unknown. Comedy should make you think and keep your brain active and unlock things in the back of your mind. Instead, "The Play What I Wrote" just gave it some candy floss to sit and get fat on, no signs of stretching the imagination or creativity. It is far more an achievement to get a capacity audience to split their sides by just one person and a microphone. There's no relying on physical comedy, silly props or cheap one-liners. The power of words is far more effective than that. We're living in the times of Billy Connolly shouting and swearing through riotous anecdotes and the surreal child-like world that Eddie Izzard creates around himself, totally turning the normal on it's head. I found it hard to follow what was going on half the time; the play didn't seem to make any progress for itself and was based around a poorly written script with a plot looser than a loose thing that's just graduated at the university of looseness with a 2:1 in being loose. ...read more.

Conclusion

What's also suprising is the eagerness of so many big names to be involved in the show. Nigel Havers was at the performance we saw but past guests have included Sir Ian McKellen, Dawn French, Sting, Ewan McGregor, David Suchet and Roger Moore. I felt uncomfortable to see Havers play a fairly weak cameo role in a weak play. His agents must've been pretty desperate after the flop of 'Manchild'! But it was a nice surprise even if it was a far cry from his performance in 'Chariots of Fire' (incidentally the only time I laughed was when Tony Sedgwick did the impression of him doing the 'champagne on the hurdles' scene from the film in slow motion. It was funny right down to the Vangellis soundtrack blaring away over the top. It was also the only part most of my friends didn't laugh at!) Overall 'The Play What I Wrote' lived up to what it was meant to do and pleased the target audience it was designed for. However, I felt it relied to much on physical props, cheap one-liners, corny punch lines, audience reaction and above all a style of nostalgic dated comedy that is totally out of place on the scene today. 1/10! [A E1] ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Plays section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Plays essays

  1. The birthday party analysis

    Pinter himself spoke of this form as being one of the most pure for the theatre. For Pinter, one room, a few characters, and a door, and the fear of what will come through the door next is all that is necessary for a good play.

  2. Performing Arts evaluation

    went over things we didn't need to go over this just wasted time and could have been of more convenience to the scenes and characters we didn't know so well. Next time we need to be more subjective when deciding to polish certain scenes and characters.

  1. Eve and Serpant Role Play Evaluation

    Lindsey, however, appeared very weak and easily influenced. Lindsey sound very worried, she stuttered a lot and kept a hushed voice because she so very nervous about being caught talking. Lindsey kept her eye line low in her chair with her legs crossed to show that she did not want to be disturbed.

  2. From dusk till dawn

    The audience is reassured that Ritchie's motives are cruel. The thunder along with the shadow represents a sinister side to Ritchie's personality and his instability also confirms that he is planning something unpleasant. The non-diegetic music and intent stares only occur when Seth is out of the room or not looking at his brother.

  1. The stimulus we were given to look at was the play 'Too Much Punch ...

    Judy dresses quite scruffily and is very confident and doesn't care what people think, although on the inside I think she just needs to be loved. Jo is Judy's older sister. She has always been the 'better' child, preferred by their Mum, Vi.

  2. Bill Forsyth wrote Gregory's girl in 1981

    When she is playing it becomes obvious that Dorothy is confident and will get in the team furthermore she knows she was the best person at the trial she tells the audience and confirms it with Phil "I was the best, you know I was the best".

  1. 'The Gift' and 'Frankenstein' - Response, Development and Evaluation

    After the performance we were then hot seated to show how closely we had identified with our characters. We were each asked why we should be given the first transplants. I described that I should be treated first as I had don nothing wrong to aggravate my condition.

  2. Media studies Evaluation for video front cover, storyboard and Research

    male killers, female victims Story Board Our opening scene (establishing shot) is set in America, New York next to the statue of liberty. By having an establishing shot it sets the location so the audiences know where they are. The next shot is a low angle shot looking upwards at a building panning and zooming.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work