• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Whose life is it anyway?" - Ken Harrison

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In the play "whose life is it anyway?" ken Harrison's views about what is best for him conflict with what his doctors want for him. By selecting significant exchanges from both acts explain how dr Emerson and dr Scott respond to ken and how the playwright, Brian Clark, puts across the tensions between them to an audience. The play is set in a ward in a general hospital. Six months ago Ken Harrison was involved in a serious car accident giving him injury's such as: fractured left and right tibia, a fractured pelvis, four broken ribs, punctured lung, a dislocated fourth vertebrae, and a ruptured spinal cord leaving him permanently paralysed from the neck down. Ken was on his way home from work and drove into the side of an out of control heavy goods vehicle. The audience soon find out what Ken thinks about the future and if he wants to be there to see it then later decides he wants to die. ...read more.

Middle

Later Ken and Dr Scott talk about why Ken should or shouldn't take the prescribed vallium. One minute they're serious and Ken explains his point of view clearly. But after that Ken is back to using his sense of humour and in the film he says to Dr Scott "that's what I always say if ever in doubt whether or not to take a tranquillizer, sleep on it." This shows that they are starting to communicate well with one another. Dr Scott responds well to this humour she shows this by laughing with him, she seems comfortable around him. At the point in the play when Doctor Emerson gives ken an injection of Valium, the audience can tell that the relationship between them has completely broken down. After doctor Scott's visit to ken, doctor Emerson saw ken later in his room doctor Emerson gave ken the vallium when he was at his most vulnerable and without his consent. ...read more.

Conclusion

At this point in the play Ken uses humour and intelligence to win the fight for his right to die. Brian Clark makes the characters seem very realistic. The use of lighting at the end of the film might suggest the end of Ken's life. I don't think an audience would expect Ken to change his mind at the last minute because he has carried his argument through against his doctors. An audience might not like Dr Emerson although they respect his professionalism they would prefer Dr Scott because she is kind hearted but she also let her personal feelings get in the way of doing her job at more than one point in the play. The play seems very realistic and if it were to happen in reality then Euthanasia would become legal in this country. I think Euthanasia should become legal in this country in some cases such as elderly people that can't take the pressure of surgery or people in ken's position that want to die. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Plays section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Plays essays

  1. How does Brian Clark make use of dramatic techniques to make the audience sympathise ...

    Scott is a female junior registrar in the hospital. Although she is a more junior doctor than Dr Emerson, she is a lot more understanding and takes the patients' needs into consideration a lot more. For example, when Ken refuses the tranquilliser, she tries to understand his point of view.

  2. Does Clark present arguments for and against 'assisted suicide' without prejudicing the audience in ...

    As the play goes on though, we see that she does actually get personally involved with Ken, beyond the call of duty, and supports his decision to want to die, whereas at the start of the play she was against it as it defied her medical ethics.

  1. Evaluate Brian Clark's play "Whose Life Is It Anyway?"

    pro-death movement, and its meaning has changed from "quality of life" to "quality of living" to the "quality of a life" to the "value of a life." These changes in meaning have promoted the belief that a life with low quality is not worth living.

  2. The stimulus we were given to look at was the play 'Too Much Punch ...

    in a 'cheesy' American accent and used exaggerated movements as I drank my beer. When I narrated the story of 'Jimmy and Sandy' I again used a fun American accent which fitted well with the happy mood we were trying to create.

  1. The Trust Ward D57.

    As the visuals and sounds finish the camera appears to be upside down. The person watching sees what a patient would see if he or she was being wheeled down on a trolley. It appears to be very eerie and gives the audience a sullen feeling about what is going on.

  2. Analysing 'Whose Life Anyway?'

    This enhances the dramatic content and creates tension, which further entertains and intrigues the audience, whilst making them angry and frustrated. The conflict of opinions in this play creates tension, which excites the audience and maintains the inter-personal relationships between the characters which, in turn, create the overall atmosphere needed to keep the audiences attention.

  1. How does Brian Clark make his play "Whose life is it anyway?" Interesting, Memorable ...

    Ken's use of black humour masks his true feelings. However bad his predicament gets he still manages to cover up his real feelings except when talking to John. In act one for example he confides in John. "You must be in charge of the compost heap.

  2. Theatre Review on 'Whose Life is it anyway?

    I was really impressed how she didn't move any inch of her body at any time, which must have been a very challenging task to do, and she was very successful as it made her character a lot stronger and believable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work