• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Whose life is it anyway?

Extracts from this document...


Whose life is it anyway? In the final tribunal scenes to decide Ken's fate, whose side is the audience on? How are we persuaded to one side or the other? The final tribunal scenes is the most important part of the play because the final decision over Ken's life.This has been argued between the doctors and Ken throughout the play. But in the last scene Ken's life will be decided by someone who has power and authority. Ken argues with the "professionalism" of the medics. They wish to save life, even if the quality of that life is little more than biological existance. For most of the play the audience are on the doctors side because they describe Ken to be so depressed that he cannot make a rational decision on his own. It is only in the final tribunal scenes that the audience start to believe that Ken isn't insane. The audience is on the Doctors side most of the time because they have discussions about patients always winning and that the doctors are the weak end of the chain, in terms of law. ...read more.


Dr. Emerson describes Ken's suspected mental trauma as "common" in patients with ken's situation. He also describes it to be "impossible" for an accident like this not to affect the mind. The audience will take the sides of the Doctors and staff unless they recall back to the beginning of the play when Ken was first admitted to the hospital when Ken was finding it hard to take in his situation. He dealt with this by joking about his condition, which would have been the point where the accident had of affected his mind. But towards the end of the play Ken had realized his condition and stopped his witty comments about his condition and made his decision of not wanting to live. He had tried to accept his disability and failed which led to his decision. "Still, you must be in charge of the compost heap. That's where I should be." The audience would be please that Ken has another Doctor that has worked with mental patients to be fighting for Ken that is able to speak the oppositions language. ...read more.


Unless the audience would think that Ken is trying to disguise his depression by his wit and intelligence. "I seem to remember something in the papers - " After both parties have given their points I think the audience are on Ken's side, because anyone should have to the right to life, and it appears that Ken is not suffering from depression he just cant except his disability. When the judge gives his final summary and decision about Ken's case the audience just want to hear the verdict but instead the judge sums up the case with a few twists and turns before he gives his verdict. Ken doesn't allow Dr. Scott to kiss him because Ken thinks She is trying to get him to change his mind. He might think that Dr. Scott is using the last resort of "unprofessional" love to try and get him to change his mind. Ken might think that the kiss might make him change his mind because his has become very close with Dr. Scott during his time at the hospital but he doesn't want that friendly affection to turn into anything more because Ken realizes that it would not be possible to love someone in his situation. Danny Walker ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Plays section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Plays essays

  1. "Whose life is it anyway?" - Ken Harrison

    at least one of his doctors has his best interests at heart. Through use of short sentences: 'you're on' the playwright quickly brings this to the audiences' attention. 'Take the tablets; the dose is small the minimum.............injection. This shows that Doctor Scott cares about his feelings and is starting to

  2. Analysing 'Whose Life Anyway?'

    The two main characters are Dr. Scott and Dr. Emerson. Dr. Scott believes that there may be some positive gain for Ken, and she is a more flexible doctor, incorporating new ideas into her work. Her views on Ken's treatment, particularly his sedation and condition are important, as they mirror

  1. How does Brian Clark make his play "Whose life is it anyway?" Interesting, Memorable ...

    All dark green and cream. It's surprising what a few pastel colours can do isn't it? Really Cheerful." After this Ken replies. "Yes; perhaps they should try painting me I'd hate to be the one that ruins the d�cor." This tells us that he almost feels a waste of space.

  2. Theatre Review on 'Whose Life is it anyway?

    The greatness about his character was that he could easily break the tension, and was able to change the mood from something that was quite dull and depressing to something that was fun and lively. John's character was very up-beat, which would always be portrayed through his body language, and his verbal communication.

  1. 'How does Ridley Scott convince you that the Romans are not invaders and Maximus ...

    Maximus shows brilliant military strategies, he can be compared to a chess player, having to take risks and make sacrifices however they are acceptable in the rules of warfare. The audience are intrigued by this, and eager to learn more about Maximus, and analyse his every movement and speech.

  2. Does Clark present arguments for and against 'assisted suicide' without prejudicing the audience in ...

    one is the injection scene, when Dr Emerson injects Ken with a drug that Ken earlier refused, "Please let me make myself clear. I specifically refused permission to stick that needle in my arm and you didn't listen!" This makes the audience turn against Dr Emerson, because he ignored Ken and invaded Ken's rights.

  1. Does Clark present arguments for and against 'assisted suicide' without prejudicing the audience in ...

    This would not be so in the 1970s as people were a lot less informed of their rights thirty years ago. There are many changing relationships in the play, e.g. Dr Scott, who, when the play begins, is very professional towards Ken and tries not to got too involved with him or develop any emotional attachment to him.

  2. Evaluate Brian Clark's play "Whose Life Is It Anyway?"

    The play was set in 1970s, and it was relevant to the ideas developing in the society in this period. In the 1960s, the term "quality of life" was first introduced to describe the overall welfare of a population. In the 1970s the popular term has been "adopted by the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work