• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Whose life is it anyway?

Extracts from this document...


Whose life is it anyway? In the final tribunal scenes to decide Ken's fate, whose side is the audience on? How are we persuaded to one side or the other? The final tribunal scenes is the most important part of the play because the final decision over Ken's life.This has been argued between the doctors and Ken throughout the play. But in the last scene Ken's life will be decided by someone who has power and authority. Ken argues with the "professionalism" of the medics. They wish to save life, even if the quality of that life is little more than biological existance. For most of the play the audience are on the doctors side because they describe Ken to be so depressed that he cannot make a rational decision on his own. It is only in the final tribunal scenes that the audience start to believe that Ken isn't insane. The audience is on the Doctors side most of the time because they have discussions about patients always winning and that the doctors are the weak end of the chain, in terms of law. ...read more.


Dr. Emerson describes Ken's suspected mental trauma as "common" in patients with ken's situation. He also describes it to be "impossible" for an accident like this not to affect the mind. The audience will take the sides of the Doctors and staff unless they recall back to the beginning of the play when Ken was first admitted to the hospital when Ken was finding it hard to take in his situation. He dealt with this by joking about his condition, which would have been the point where the accident had of affected his mind. But towards the end of the play Ken had realized his condition and stopped his witty comments about his condition and made his decision of not wanting to live. He had tried to accept his disability and failed which led to his decision. "Still, you must be in charge of the compost heap. That's where I should be." The audience would be please that Ken has another Doctor that has worked with mental patients to be fighting for Ken that is able to speak the oppositions language. ...read more.


Unless the audience would think that Ken is trying to disguise his depression by his wit and intelligence. "I seem to remember something in the papers - " After both parties have given their points I think the audience are on Ken's side, because anyone should have to the right to life, and it appears that Ken is not suffering from depression he just cant except his disability. When the judge gives his final summary and decision about Ken's case the audience just want to hear the verdict but instead the judge sums up the case with a few twists and turns before he gives his verdict. Ken doesn't allow Dr. Scott to kiss him because Ken thinks She is trying to get him to change his mind. He might think that Dr. Scott is using the last resort of "unprofessional" love to try and get him to change his mind. Ken might think that the kiss might make him change his mind because his has become very close with Dr. Scott during his time at the hospital but he doesn't want that friendly affection to turn into anything more because Ken realizes that it would not be possible to love someone in his situation. Danny Walker ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Plays section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Plays essays

  1. Evaluate Brian Clark's play "Whose Life Is It Anyway?"

    The tension is increasing as the events develop: when informed by a social worker of the things he will be able to do "with training and a little patience," such as operate a typewriter and reading machines, Ken replies that this "would not be good enough," which gives the audience an indication of a developing conflict.

  2. Analysing 'Whose Life Anyway?'

    This enhances the dramatic content and creates tension, which further entertains and intrigues the audience, whilst making them angry and frustrated. The conflict of opinions in this play creates tension, which excites the audience and maintains the inter-personal relationships between the characters which, in turn, create the overall atmosphere needed to keep the audiences attention.

  1. How does Brian Clark make use of dramatic techniques to make the audience sympathise ...

    The play is structured in such a way that the audience finds out things gradually. In using gradual revelation, the audience is given more time to fully understand Ken's situation and is able to empathise with him. Another important structure Clark uses is his use of argumentative writing.

  2. How does Brian Clark make his play "Whose life is it anyway?" Interesting, Memorable ...

    All dark green and cream. It's surprising what a few pastel colours can do isn't it? Really Cheerful." After this Ken replies. "Yes; perhaps they should try painting me I'd hate to be the one that ruins the d�cor." This tells us that he almost feels a waste of space.

  1. Theatre Review on 'Whose Life is it anyway?

    I also enjoyed the role of the janitor or else known as 'John.' His role was of a very typical 'cool guy' character, which worked in the hospital part time, and enjoyed the clubbing, charming the ladies and playing in his band.

  2. "Whose life is it anyway?" - Ken Harrison

    Ken said: "Well, I'll tell you. That's because it's broken, broken in two. But each part carries on bravely yearning for a woman in a white coat." Dr Scott remains formal and doesn't play up to kens flirting.

  1. 'How does Ridley Scott convince you that the Romans are not invaders and Maximus ...

    Maximus unexpectedly Looks up, sees a robin and smiles to himself, as the bird reminds him of the time when there were no wars and hunger for power, a time where happiness and love overpowered all factors. He is suddenly filled with determination; it was as if the bird filled him with hope and assured him of freedom.

  2. Does Clark present arguments for and against 'assisted suicide' without prejudicing the audience in ...

    one is the injection scene, when Dr Emerson injects Ken with a drug that Ken earlier refused, "Please let me make myself clear. I specifically refused permission to stick that needle in my arm and you didn't listen!" This makes the audience turn against Dr Emerson, because he ignored Ken and invaded Ken's rights.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work