• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Chile: Better of Joining NAFTA or MERCOSUR?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Chile: Better of Joining NAFTA or MERCOSUR? For many, Chile represents a natural first step in expanding hemispheric trade. Although Chile is a relatively small market, its political stability, growing export-oriented economy, and pro-market reforms over the past decade and a half positioned the country as a prime candidate for integration with NAFTA of MERCOSUR. In 1996 Chile's population was roughly 15 million. GDP was $56.4 billion and per capita income was $ 3,848.Chile's total trade in goods was #33.2 billion, with exports of $15.4 billion and imports of $17.8 billion. (World bank, World Development Report, Washington, DC: The world Bank, 1997). Traditional products such as minerals (cooper), fishmeal, and wood pulp account for most of Chile's export revenues; however, the share of trade earnings from export of wood manufactures, basic metal products, fruits, and wine is increasing. Chile imports oil, chemicals, industrial and transportation equipment, share parts and food products, including wheat, live animals and meat, and tropical commodities such as coffee. Chile's trade is well distributed among Western Hemisphere countries, the nations of Western Europe, and Asia (see appendix, Table 1). In 1996, the United States, Canada, and Mexico (NAFTA) accounted for 25.0% of Chile's trade, while the European Union represented 18.6%, the Asia-Pacific countries 22.8%, and MERCOSUR 18.7%. The United States is Chile's principal trading partner, receiving 16.7% of Chile's exports and accounting for 30.5% of its imports. ...read more.

Middle

General Pinochet relinquished control of the government while remaining chief of the army after Patricio Aylwin was elected president in 1990. Today, Chile faces the change of consolidating and expanding its export markets, and attracting long-term foreign investment in order to carry its "new" domestic development strategy based on an open economy, export promotion and the discipline of competition. Accordingly, Chile has created an expanding network of bilateral free trade agreements, having signed over 12, and maintained an overall 11% tariff rate (low by Latin American Standards). At the end of 1944, Chile joined the Asian-Pacific Economic Cooperation Forum (APEC) as the only non-Asian member of the organization besides the NAFTA countries. In June 1996, Chile became associated with MERCOSUR and the Europe Union (but not as fully fledged member). In 1997, Chile finalized a bilateral agreement with Canada and initiated bilateral discussion with Mexico. Chile has been waiting to begin formal negotiation for membership in NAFTA since 1994. Would Chile be better off joining NAFTA or MERCOSUR? Conventional trade theory holds that if the comparative advantage held by a country's industries in world trade is increased of preserved by membership in a particular trading bloc, said membership can lead to trade creation and enhanced country welfare (that is, higher GDP, jobs, and income)(Salvatore, Dominick, International Economics, Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.1995, pp.30-36). ...read more.

Conclusion

887 5.8 282 1.6 1169 3.5 ASIA-PACIFIC 4959 32.3 2601 14.5 7560 22.8 JAPAN 2496 16.3 950 5.3 3446 10.4 SOUTH COREA 864 5.6 557 3.1 1421 4.3 ANDEAN CM 1009 6.6 914 5.1 1923 5.8 Table 2. Chile's exports to the World, NAFTA and MERCOSUR (Average 1990-94) bi Commodity Type, Value (million US$), and % Share Commodity Type World NAFTA MERCOSUR US $ % US $ % US $ % All 9.6000.8 100.0 1.608.4 16.8 1.041.9 10.9 Non-manufactures 4.809.1 100.0 876.9 18.2 453.4 9.4 Manufactures 4.346.7 100.0 728.8 16.8 584.1 13.4 Not Classified 445.0 100.0 2.7 4.3 4.4 8.7 Table 3. Chile's Exports (Average 1990-94) to NAFTA and MERCOSUR by Commodity Type, Value (US$), and % Share Commodity Type NAFTA+MERCOSUR NAFTA MERCOSUR US $ % US $ % US $ % All 2.650.3 100.0 1.608.4 60.7 1.041.9 39.3 Non-manufactures 1.330.3 100.0 876.9 65.9 453.4 34.1 Manufactures 1.312.9 100.0 728.8 55.5 584.1 44.5 Not Classified 7.1 100.0 2.7 38.0 4.4 62.0 Table 4. Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficients for Chile's Exports to NAFTA and MERCOSUR by Commodity Type, Against Chile's Exports to the World Commodity Type Chile-NAFTA Chile-MERCOSUR All 0.94 0.77 Non-manufactures 0.90 0.78 Manufactures 0.94 0.76 POLI 307 Dr. Leila Atraqchi CLASS PRESENTATION "CHILE: NAFTA OR MERCOSUR?" Student: Svetlana Avdeeva ID #: 4457188 March 30, 2004 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Why has GDP growth been so slow in Somalia?

    The livestock ban significantly damaged the economy and worsened pastoral livelihoods, pushing many pastoralists into destitution. Demand was skewed towards the basic necessities such as food and clothes. The people had no purchasing power and thus GDP growth slowed. The capital stock of an economy represents its accumulated stock of

  2. Outline the debate about whether 'export-led growth' is better or worse than 'import substituting ...

    1950's through import substitution industrialisation, with the establishment of the state-owned Chaebol industries producing for the domestic market. US aid played a crucial role in establishing and maintaining this industrial base; without the foreign exchange receipts provided by aid, Hewitt, Johnson and Wield (1992)

  1. Liberation Theology versus Neo-liberalism

    In the wake of Globalization, capital is no longer being invested in the productive process but rather it is being wasted in the financing of the speculative process. Also, machine power trumps human labor leaving many jobs overrun by these machines.

  2. David Ricardo theory of comparative advantage

    If the terms of trade closed to the pre-trade cost ratio of a country, the less gain from trade and also the other countries will gain more. (Nigel Grimwade 2008). To determine the terms of trade must find law of reciprocal demand.

  1. Free essay

    does uk housing market warrant government intervention

    on this kind of scale will be to great and outweigh the benefits that are potentially going to be gained. Other solutions Some other solutions put forward include the implementation of stricter borrowing limits based on disposable income, this would cut the amount of people with demand for more expensive

  2. trading blocs

    would be able to accede to a cheaper labour force from the Eastern countries for the EU and from Mexico for NAFTA. Thanks to this cheaper labour force, products will be cheaper and more competitive in the market. The increase of competition lowers prices or costs, enhance ability to achieve

  1. Carbon Credit Trading

    Heinz has expressed interest in sustainable manufacturing. Involving themselves in a program such as the CCX would be beneficial to Heinz, as it would contribute to Heinz's sustainability, as well as provide experience in dealing with future regulatory schemes. The compliance segment of the carbon market is commonly branched off

  2. Advantages and diasadvantages of joining the Euro

    I am going to discuss some major issues which would arise if the UK did join. Stability and Growth Joining the euro may restrict the amount of long-term borrowing the UK is able to carry out. Euro zone countries are subject to the stability & growth pact, which means that countries must not spend beyond their means.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work