• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss Globalization.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

ECONOMICS AND SOCIETY - U52005 Globalization Coursework Jack Torrens-Spence- 06049458 Word Count: 2,032 Question: 'I believe that globalisation - the removal of barriers to free trade and the closer integration of national economies - can be a force for good and that it has the potential to enrich everyone in the world, particularly the poor. But I also believe that if this is to be the case, the way globalisation has been managed, including the international trade agreements that have played such a large role in removing those barriers and the policies that have been imposed on developing countries in the process of globalisation, need to be radically rethought.' (Joseph Stiglitz, Winner of the Nobel Prize for Economics 2001) The following assignment gives you the opportunity to examine some of the issues raised in the above quotation, namely why most economists are in favour of free trade and economic integration and why, despite this, the world is still some way from achieving this outcome. 1. Explain, using appropriate economic concepts, why most economists believe that free trade and the abolition of protectionist measures are welfare enhancing. (30 marks) 2. Explain why, despite the arguments presented in 1. above, the most recent round of trade talks (The Doha Development Round) ended in failure with many trade barriers continuing to proliferate. ...read more.

Middle

One of the main reasons that countries use to justify keeping import restrictions across the whole economy is that it will protect domestic employment. The idea behind this is that if a government restricted imports then people in the country would buy more of the relatively cheaper domestic products and thus raise domestic employment. Although this sounds sensible it is a short term policy as if imposing import restrictions is likely to lessen other countries abilities to purchase exports. This may well mean that the raise in employment from the domestic market is offset by the fall in employment from exports. Pursuing this kind of policy could even lead to rising levels of un-employment, if it causes other countries to retaliate by raising their tariffs and thus creates a trade war, in which case both countries will lose out. Another reason why governments might try to protect their whole industrial base would be to help with their balance of payments position. If there is a situation where expenditure of imports is more that expenditure on exports, then a government might try to stop this by restricting the imports a country, in an attempt to divert domestic expenditure from imports to domestic products. This policy however has all the same disadvantages as the argument for protecting domestic employment, and is also short term. ...read more.

Conclusion

Overall I think that globalization is always going to be placed against the environment because the key to globalization is free markets with as little government intervention as possible. It is clear that in a free market system pollution and damage to the world's recourses is a negative externality and so is not taken into account by the market prices. For the environmental issues we face to be tackled in any consequential way the whole world needs to start trying to incorporate environmental damage into costs of production on microeconomic scale, and with its emphasise on profit maximisation and increased productivity I don't think that globalization, in the form that's being put forwards today will be beneficial to this process. A great example of this conflict comes from the Kyoto agreement in 1997. There 110 nations came together to try and start making steps to reducing greenhouse emissions. One of the only countries who refused to sign was the USA, who are the largest polluter in the world by far, and also one of the foremost proponents of capitalism and globalization as the way for all states in the future. The reason that the US gave for not signing the treaty was that it was "too costly, and would damage the US economy." I consider that this almost perfectly demonstrates the underlying choice that has to be made between pure, short-term economic thinking or a more balanced social approach. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is Increased globalization a good thing?

    5 star(s)

    The world is becoming more homogeneous. Differences between people are diminishing, developing a cosmopolitan community. Such transformations are likely to lead to fewer disagreements amongst nations. Greater harmony will make war less likely. In fact, there are arguments that accelerated globalisation since the 1960s may have reduced the chances of major interstate war.

  2. Analyse the reasons for reducing protection and its impact on the domestic and ...

    increase their share of exports by 1%, resulting gains in income could lift 128 million people out of poverty. Furthermore, protection levels tend to have been reduced in areas such as manufacturing: this has little benefit to developing countries, which tend to rely more on export commodities.

  1. Free essay

    does uk housing market warrant government intervention

    The Time Period To build enough houses to have any considerable affect on the supply of housing for example a housing estate can take in excess of five years. From these three factors we can infer that there will be a very Inelastic Supply Curve for the South East.

  2. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    is exceptional in having effectively locked in unilateral liberalisation by binding GATT and GATS commitments at or close to applied measures at home. The bottom line is that, while multilateral efforts can be of some assistance, the key is to liberalise unilaterally.

  1. Discuss Globalization.

    The combining of the institutions and practices of democracy with the effective governance of global authorities has being of great importance. For example, the recent Lockerbie bombing trials have taken place in the Netherlands under Scottish law. This could not have occurred without such close links between nations, a benefit of globalization.

  2. Corruption and Globalisation - Both of them have been so pervasive in recent years. ...

    (Neelankavil, 2003) But, these four countries are also among the most corrupt in the world, which will result in an inefficient world economy. Price and quality of finished goods are also affected in countries where there is high-level of corruption.

  1. Does globalization inherently increase inequality or can it be made to work for the ...

    However, Dollar and Kraay found (only working on the countries working in the bottom 20 per cent of the income distribution) that the so called losers do not come disproportionably from the poor. Importantly, the research they carried out actually found the only countries that had reduced or achieved any

  2. Comprehensive Anatomy of China

    Even though China spent roughly $60 billion in 2003 on military expenditures (an estimated 3.5-5% of GDP) it lacks weapons and training of a modern day militia. Thus, the PLA is primarily defensive in nature; although, China does have small supply conventional warheads and nuclear missiles with significant range capabilities.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work