Discuss the benefits of economic growth

Review of essay

Rating: 5 star(s)

Response to the question

This essay responds to the question at a good level, looking at the benefits of economic growth and the limitations. If I were answering this question, I would've looked at the difference between short-run and long-run growth, which would allow a judgement about whether both are desirable. The reason this essay doesn't access the top marks, despite the evaluative discussion of the limitations, is that there is no discussion of the extent. A paragraph such as "the extent to which growth is beneficial depends upon" would've enabled a strong essay. It is not good enough at A-Level to come to a conclusion and say "economic growth brings more desire than harm for a country". Although the word always isn't used in this sentence, it is suggested due to the lack of sometimes, or equivalent. It is essential to show the examiner that you are aware not all situations are the same, and unfortunately this essay doesn't do that.

Level of analysis

The analysis in this essay is good. The mechanisms are explained well. For example "Economic growth can also reduce poverty within a country" is not simply stated, with the essay going onto explaining how it can reduce poverty. Being able to explore concepts rather than assert them will gain you credit. I feel this essay could've elaborated upon points at times. The paragraph on international status needed to address why this is important to an economy. The exploration of sustainability is good, and there is good awareness of why this is significant to economic growth. Although not explicit, this is showing exploration of whether economic growth is desirable to different groups and viewpoints. I would make this more clear, as this shows strong analysis. For example, commenting that economic growth may not be favourable in the eyes of the poor due to widening inequality, but that it will be beneficial for the rich, will allow you to gain the top marks. I always ask myself "is it always?" and this prompts you to address the difference in viewpoints. You can take this further to look at different political and economic theories, but they aren't necessary.

Quality of writing

The essay doesn't have the best structure. Yes, economic growth is defined in the introduction, but the introduction begins to analyse. I would've made sure the introduction is concise and sets up the argument. The style here is good, with each step of a mechanism flowing well from the next due to the language used. I like the use of technical terms and the definitions given, as this shows a strong foundation of knowledge. Spelling, punctuation and grammar are strong.