• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the view that monopoly power is always negative from a consumer and economic view point.

Extracts from this document...


Discuss the view that monopoly power is always negative from a consumer and economic view point (15) A monopoly is a market structure where only one firm supplies the output of the industry. There is only one firm in the industry, which has control over the supply of the product and can maintain control in the long run. The firm is able to dominate a market or several firms collude to influence the output and price, and therefore able to increase their collective profits. Monopoly power has benefits as well as disadvantages in both the view of the consumer as well as from an economic view point. From the consumers' point of view, monopoly power may be seen as negative because the main aspects that the consumers consider are the price of the products and the amount of consumer surplus. Monopoly power usually means that a higher price will be charged and output will be low. This is because, due to the high barriers to entry causing no competition. The graph below shows that in comparison to the perfect competition market structure, monopoly charges higher prices. ...read more.


Therefore, the increase in competition causes the abnormal profit to be competed away. However, this does not apply to monopolies because there is no competition in the market structure. This causes the monopolies not to be efficient. This is because they have no incentive to become efficient, as they are complacent. The fact that costs are not minimised by effective management is called x-efficient. However, in a natural monopoly, where the economies of scale are really high, they could be efficient due to the shape of the long run average cost curve. This could allow them to be productively efficient. Another factor, which would consider that monopoly power, is negative. From an economic view, is the resource costs involved. The cost of maintaining a monopoly in its position is really high, which can in most ways be seen as the misusing of scarce resources. A monopoly, to get to its position, will require resources, for example, barriers to entry. This use of resources allows monopolies to be in their position and can be seen as misused because resources are being used and no extra output is being produces. ...read more.


As well as being productively efficient, natural monopolies have low prices, which is favourable to consumers. However, although this could be the case, it is unlikely because there are not many natural monopolies that exist. From an economic point of view, monopoly power could be considered to be beneficial because they are able to participate in innovation. Long-term abnormal profit can give monopolies the incentive to invest more heavily in research and development. This investment could cause lower prices, which the monopoly can use to give a return on the initial capital costs. However, under certain circumstances this may not be the case because there is no certainty that the monopolist will innovate. The security of very limited competition means there are no immediate market pressures on the monopolists to reduce costs and innovate at all. Also, monopolies may not innovate because it would mean that their costs would be high in the short-run. Develop the however more Overall, there are many negative impacts of monopoly power; however, there are also benefits, both to the consumer and from an economic view. We can definitely reach the conclusion that monopoly power is not always negative as there are advantages. However, overall, the disadvantages do overpower the advantages of monopoly power when considering the view economically or form the consumers' view ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy essays

  1. What are the implications for economic welfare of a market structure changing from perfect ...

    If perfectly competitive firm innovates, profits rise. However, in the long-run the firm's competitors will enter the market (copy the innovation) and force profits back to zero. So there is no incentive for innovation exists in perfectly competitive markets. But if monopoly firm innovates, profits rise.

  2. "Discuss and evaluate the proposition that perfect competition is a more efficient market structure ...

    Monopolies can take advantage from economies of scale. This way it is very difficult for other firms to enter the industry to compete against the monopoly. If a firm enters the industry, it would be productively inefficient. A natural monopoly occurs when economies of scale are so large that there is only room for one firm in the industry.

  1. Evaluate the role played by barriers to entry in the long run

    taken them one step ahead of other business and is offering something new. Because barriers to entry are very high then this prevents or makes it difficult for business to just begin trading and join this market thus protecting a company and allowing them to continue generating supernormal profits for a longer period of time.

  2. In this essay, I would like to take a view at the implications for ...

    On the other hand, the economic welfare represents the allocative efficiency and productive efficiency. When the value consumers place on a good or service equals the cost of the resources used up in production, which means the price equals the marginal cost, allocative efficiency is achieved and the economic welfare is maximized.

  1. Outline the economic argument against monopoly. Is there anything which can be said in ...

    These include natural cost advantages such as ownership of all key sites in an industry, marketing barriers, restrictive practices designed to force and competitor to leave the market. These barriers to entry seem to be unfair on new entrants because their chances of breaking into the industry are slim because

  2. What is a Monopoly?

    This is the competitive price of Pc and with a smaller quantity that the competitive quantity of Qc. The profit the business gains; is the shaded area, labelled profit. Monopolies develop in various ways, horizontal integration, vertical integration, creation of a statutory monopoly, franchises and licences, internal expansion of a firm etc.

  1. Monopoly. The following is going to discuss that monopoly is always against the ...

    gas, electricity. Competition would lead to duplication of resources. Unlike monopoly, perfect competition, another extreme form, is normally defined through a number of assumptions or conditions: a lager number of sellers and buyers are price taker, they have to accept market determined price.

  2. What Are The Effects Of Tescos Oligopolistic Market Structure, On Both Consumers And Producers?

    Overall, the success of Tesco is probably based mainly on getting the basics of retailing correct, and getting it right slightly more often than its competitors. TESCO'S UTILISATION OF TECHNOLOGY TO ATTRACT CONSUMERS Like any large firm, Tesco are bound to invest money in research and development, and through this

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work