• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the view that monopoly power is always negative from a consumer and economic view point.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss the view that monopoly power is always negative from a consumer and economic view point (15) A monopoly is a market structure where only one firm supplies the output of the industry. There is only one firm in the industry, which has control over the supply of the product and can maintain control in the long run. The firm is able to dominate a market or several firms collude to influence the output and price, and therefore able to increase their collective profits. Monopoly power has benefits as well as disadvantages in both the view of the consumer as well as from an economic view point. From the consumers' point of view, monopoly power may be seen as negative because the main aspects that the consumers consider are the price of the products and the amount of consumer surplus. Monopoly power usually means that a higher price will be charged and output will be low. This is because, due to the high barriers to entry causing no competition. The graph below shows that in comparison to the perfect competition market structure, monopoly charges higher prices. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore, the increase in competition causes the abnormal profit to be competed away. However, this does not apply to monopolies because there is no competition in the market structure. This causes the monopolies not to be efficient. This is because they have no incentive to become efficient, as they are complacent. The fact that costs are not minimised by effective management is called x-efficient. However, in a natural monopoly, where the economies of scale are really high, they could be efficient due to the shape of the long run average cost curve. This could allow them to be productively efficient. Another factor, which would consider that monopoly power, is negative. From an economic view, is the resource costs involved. The cost of maintaining a monopoly in its position is really high, which can in most ways be seen as the misusing of scarce resources. A monopoly, to get to its position, will require resources, for example, barriers to entry. This use of resources allows monopolies to be in their position and can be seen as misused because resources are being used and no extra output is being produces. ...read more.

Conclusion

As well as being productively efficient, natural monopolies have low prices, which is favourable to consumers. However, although this could be the case, it is unlikely because there are not many natural monopolies that exist. From an economic point of view, monopoly power could be considered to be beneficial because they are able to participate in innovation. Long-term abnormal profit can give monopolies the incentive to invest more heavily in research and development. This investment could cause lower prices, which the monopoly can use to give a return on the initial capital costs. However, under certain circumstances this may not be the case because there is no certainty that the monopolist will innovate. The security of very limited competition means there are no immediate market pressures on the monopolists to reduce costs and innovate at all. Also, monopolies may not innovate because it would mean that their costs would be high in the short-run. Develop the however more Overall, there are many negative impacts of monopoly power; however, there are also benefits, both to the consumer and from an economic view. We can definitely reach the conclusion that monopoly power is not always negative as there are advantages. However, overall, the disadvantages do overpower the advantages of monopoly power when considering the view economically or form the consumers' view ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy essays

  1. What are the implications for economic welfare of a market structure changing from perfect ...

    If perfectly competitive firm innovates, profits rise. However, in the long-run the firm's competitors will enter the market (copy the innovation) and force profits back to zero. So there is no incentive for innovation exists in perfectly competitive markets. But if monopoly firm innovates, profits rise.

  2. Evaluate the role played by barriers to entry in the long run

    Below is a diagram that clearly illustrates how companies make supernormal profits: The amount of profit generated is shown on the diagram by the difference between Average Cost (AC) and Average Revenue (AR). When Average Revenue is greater than the Average Costs then the firm will be making supernormal profit per unit it is producing.

  1. what is economics

    new kitchen), demand for that product is likely to be price elastic. Income Elasticity of Demand (YED) * * The sign is important, as it indicates whether there is an increase or decrease in the quantity demanded following a change in income * Most products have a positive YED -

  2. "Discuss and evaluate the proposition that perfect competition is a more efficient market structure ...

    will be eliminated in the long run by the entry of new firms, also that when markets are in equilibrium, price and marginal cost will be equal. The most important characteristics of perfectly competitive industries are: First that they would operate at minimum average cost in the long run and

  1. In this essay, I would like to take a view at the implications for ...

    The most significant result is that the total economic welfare falls. This loss in economic welfare is called "deadweight welfare". So, generally, the economic welfare would decrease if the structure of a market changing from perfect competition to a monopoly.

  2. Monopoly. The following is going to discuss that monopoly is always against the ...

    gas, electricity. Competition would lead to duplication of resources. Unlike monopoly, perfect competition, another extreme form, is normally defined through a number of assumptions or conditions: a lager number of sellers and buyers are price taker, they have to accept market determined price.

  1. To what extent do you consider monopolies to be in the public interest?

    Customers would happily buy their products as they would have nothing to compare prices with and would rather have the trend-setting gadget. Usurping their monopoly power and making abnormal profits would allow Apple to invest in research and development which is vital in an industry that is always changing with a high turnover of ideas.

  2. What Are The Effects Of Tescos Oligopolistic Market Structure, On Both Consumers And Producers?

    15.6% share of third-placed Sainsbury's, which had been the market leader until 1995, when Tesco overtook.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work