• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does economic rivalry provide a sufficient explanation of British Imperial Expansion after 1880?

Extracts from this document...


Does economic rivalry provide a sufficient explanation of British Imperial Expansion after 1880? 1880, better known by some historians as the period of rapid European Imperialism, so much so that 90 per cent of Africa became annexed, of which a hundred million African came under European influences and control. The period in which Britain alone managed to increase its hold on the world by a further 5 million sq. miles. The very speed of this 'new imperialism' is extremely concerning and thus studying this epoch may better explain some of the political, economical and military tension that lay so very evidently within Europe. The aims and objectives of this imperialism, can really be looked at differently by different historians but according to T.O.Lloyd there existed two main priorities, being ' closer relations between Britain and the self governing colonies most of whose inhabitants were of British descendant, and also enthusiasm expansion by the acquisition of new territory' (T.O.Lloyd 209). He argues that imperial expansions were linked to ideas of nationalism. This however is not sufficient enough to explain expansions within this period, a period where political and economical turmoil is evident within Europe. Economics alone cannot explain the rapid expansion of colonies post 1880, but however neither can social or political motives alone, one thing I have to come to understand and appreciate is that the answer cannot be that economics is the main or only motive behind the expansion but rather that the reasons for expansion vary from simple economics to fear, social Darwinism, political tensions, and strategic justifications. ...read more.


The British also wanted for many reasons not to intervene too much in the administration of foreign countries. They thought this especially unnecessary, and many argued that it would prove too costly and time consuming, not to mention numerous other troubles it may bring with the indigenous people. To maybe a greater extent it can be argued that one of the main motives behind the rapid annexation of many counties and the expansion of not just the British Empire but also Empire's of other European countries, centred around the potential gains in new 'fresh' countries and the fears of economical rivalry. This idea is extremely relevant as the economic gap between European countries and Britain was coming to a quick closure, for example the export and import of French trade had increased significantly outside of Europe, between 1840 and 1880 ' In 1840 �7.7 million of her export and '�9.2 million' of her import trade was done outside Europe; in 1880 the figures were '�38.4 million' and '�73 million' (Porter 77). In comparison perhaps other European counties did not pose such a threat to Britain, but their trade was steadily increasing, and could have a big affect on British economical gain in the future. The well-known British economist, J.A.Hobson and Lenin, linked colonial expansion to economic gain and investment, arguing that the 'economic taproot of imperialism' (1) linked to colonial expansion as it was the 'excessive capital in search of investment' and this 'excessive capital' (1) ...read more.


Egypt's financial problems also affected the British, as Egypt's dept caused internal instability and allowed Egypt's creditors to take over control administration of its finances and incomes. One such creditor was France, one of Britain's rivalry powers, without the fear of the influence that the French may have on British foreign trade and economic gain Porter feels that the British may not of felt that they had to invade Egypt. Britain wanted to insure that none of its rivalry countries could take over Egypt and indeed Turkeys financial administration. The Influence and 'collaboration' that the British had with certain countries also influenced the British expansion. In areas where Britain maintained a substantial level of passiveness, like with Turkey, than they did not feel immediately threatened, however if Britain felt that the natives or the leaders of a country posed a threat to British economic and strategic interests in that country than, this fuelled British fear and led to the British making it into there protectorate, like for example Egypt where by they felt that Arabi posed a bigger threat. However important political, strategic and social motives may be, it would seem that all linked one way or another to economic gain and rivalry and so one thing is clear, that the search for overseas economic potential and investment played a very firm role in the European drive to secure colonies within this epoch. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    Finally, investment rules are already built into the WTO: strongly in GATS through "commercial presence" (mode three of supply); also in TRIPS; and weakly on the goods side in the agreements on TRIMS and Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. Before negotiations start, the Ministerial Declaration charges the Working Group on the

  2. Was late Victorian Imperialism purely economic in character?

    Lenin concludes that the rise of Capitalism is the factor that had determined imperialism. In fact that imperialism, was merely a stage in Capitalism. He argued using Marxist ideology, that by the 1870s the rise of Capitalism had caused the scramble for colonies.

  1. Globalisation of GAP

    does not have to rely on only one market others can make up for one market doing poorly. From my research I can evaluate that the decision to go into the European market using company owned shops was a bad idea.

  2. European background to the scramble for Africa (1850 to 1900)

    The soldiers resort to cutting off the hands of living people to ensure that the number of spent cartridges is the same as the number of preserved hands. The soldiers are also reported to engage in cannibalism. * Meanwhile, the news of the horrid conditions in CFS are filtered out

  1. What accounts for the fact that Britain was the richest country in Europe in ...

    The deal was successful and Britain became the largest shareholder in the Suez Canal that was so essential to her trade. Disraeli commented 'the French government has been out-generaled', this illustrated to the rest of Europe that Britain possessed the money, backing and resolve to do whatever she pleased.

  2. Why was the expansion of trade and empire so important in determining British foreign ...

    However, it was trade that had created the wealth of the empire and its expansion and it was trade that continued to hold a great influence on Britain's foreign and Imperial Policy over the period. Trade was generating enormous amounts of wealth.

  1. International Trade - I have been asked to investigate the possibility of a company ...

    The government that has been elected also work together and strive to continue to improve the financial state of the country. This is seen in their sharp increase in GDP over the last few decades from 3,228.6 to 10,416.8 in 2002 see appendix a and fig 1.

  2. International trade - In this case I choose the country Canada. When doing a ...

    Smith saw that this was a good part about the invisible hand mechanism. He identified two ways to obtain the help and cooperation of other people. First is to appeal to the benevolence and goodwill of others. And the second way is to appeal instead to other people's self-interest.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work