• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Economic globalization

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The eighteenth century presented humankind with two visions, namely, a vision of economic prosperity based on free markets and a vision of "liberty, equality and fraternity" based on democratic political institutions. The "first industrial revolution" in England was the forerunner of material prosperity while the French Revolution raised the banner of a liberal policy and society. For nearly two centuries after the English and French revolutions, the struggle to construct a liberal political and economic system occurred within the boundaries of independent states. Despite the internationalism of "free traders" and parts of the socialist movement, political and economic liberalism, perhaps paradoxically, were closely bound up with nationalism. The implicit assumption was that it was possible to have "Economic liberalism in one country." Today that assumption is being challenged by the forces of economic globalization. State boundaries gradually are becoming less important as large and rapidly growing flows of trade, investment, technology, finance capital, labor and ideas create an integrated world economy. Our political institutions, however, have lagged behind. We have a global economy but not a global policy and hence our ability to "govern the market" and ourselves is weakened. Not everyone is dissatisfied with the present state of affairs. ...read more.

Middle

The reason is continuing discrimination against products of particular importance to low income countries. The process of liberalization has generally occurred much more slowly in the cases of foodstuffs, textiles, clothing, and footwear and leather products.1 That is, even in the areas where globalization has advanced most rapidly, there has been an asymmetrical relationship. The poor have been put at the end of the queue. Protectionist forces recently have been in the ascendancy in the United States. Tariffs have been imposed on timber imported from Canada, contrary to the spirit (and perhaps the law) of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Tariffs of up to 30 per cent have been imposed on imported steel, in violation of agreements under the World Trade Organization (WTO). In 2001 alone, the United States launched 79 anti-dumping investigations, with a view to restricting imports from low-cost producers. The proposed anti-dumping measures are a response to price competition from abroad. They are, in effect, a denial of liberalization and competition, the very foundation of an efficient market economy and are incompatible with an equitable global economy. Finally, last year (2002), the United States succumbed to pressure from the farm lobby and introduced massive subsidies to the agricultural sector. ...read more.

Conclusion

We have global markets but we lack global institutions to govern those markets. The institutions that exist are unrepresentative, many people do not have a full voice in them, and they fail to conform to democratic ideals. Moreover, the structure of global governance is full of holes. There is woefully inadequate provision for supplying global public goods and there is no provision for financing them in a regular way. Foreign aid programs are dying and have yet to be replaced by a tax-and-transfer scheme that would benefit the poorest countries and those that are marginalized by the process of globalization. There is thus much to do and many challenges ahead, but I am confident that slowly but surely we will be able to meet those challenges. Sources 1. Global Backlash: Citizen Initiatives for a Just World Economy, Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield, 2002. 2. ," World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 17, No. 1, Spring 2002, Table 1, p. 116 3. Robert Heilbroner, The Worldly Philosophers, New York: Simon and Schuster, 1953, pp. 170-2. 4. World Development Indicators 2001, Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2001, Table 2.8, p. 70 5. ," Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 36, November 1954 6. Joseph E. Stiglitz, More Instruments and Broader Goals: Moving Toward the Post-Washington Consensus, Helsinki: World Institute of Development Economics Research, WIDER Annual Lectures 2, January 1998. 5 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Discuss Globalization.

    The Peace of Westphalia of 1648 formally recognized the principles of territorial sovereignty, each party to the treaty agreed to honour the boundaries of the others and to refrain from interfering in their internal affairs. It's claimed that globalization is assaulting this national sovereignty.

  2. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    Trade policy proceeds, usually simultaneously, along three main tracks: the national (unilateral) track, the bilateral/regional track and the multilateral (WTO) track. Let us examine each in turn, and then consider their interaction. How important is the WTO and what role does (or should)

  1. Discuss Globalization.

    As there are no barriers and hopefully much more information sharing the rises in productivity should come quickly to all the markets without the threat of increased competition. Another major benefit that globalization should bring to global welfare would come from the idea of comparative advantage.

  2. By the mid nineteenth century, Britain had been the world's strongest economic power for ...

    Clapham, echoed this view and he wrote in 1938, that it was very irrational of the critics of British performance to judge the entrepreneurial performance purely on the difference between American and British output, although Clapham did uncover many cases of unsatisfactory management, particularly in the staple industries.

  1. In this report, we shall explore the reasons for the shift from multilateralism to ...

    Chapter 5: Bilateralism - The New Approach With the need for speedy recovery and building up of national security post the 1997 financial crisis, East Asian countries have observed a major development of regionalism, termed as 'new regionalism', in its region.

  2. Common Economic Problems of Countries

    Under this new panorama, in many developing countries small national firms have to close, because they are not able to compete in these new economic bases. Colombia had to confront this problem when they made the decision to open their economy.

  1. Foreign Aid

    To this end a higher proportion of World Bank funds was spent on agriculture, education, health and the provision of technical assistance. The IMF and the World Bank are held in great esteem by private lending institutions and have been referred to as the 'police of development'.

  2. International trade - In this case I choose the country Canada. When doing a ...

    Portugal is relatively better at producing wine than cloth. At this point we call that Portugal have a comparative advantage in the production of wine. England is relatively better at producing cloth than wine, so England have a comparative advantage in the production of cloth.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work