• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the success of the WTO and the GATT in tariff reduction.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Economics Homework Evaluate the success of the WTO and the GATT in tariff reduction. Economic theory suggests that free trade is likely to benefit countries. By allowing each country to specialise, production will take place in locations which enjoy a comparative advantage. World trade expanded m the 19th century but the first half of the twentieth century saw a fall in trade. This was partly caused by the economic disruption of two world wars. The Great Depression of the 1930s also led countries to adopt deeply protectionist policies. Governments mistakenly believed that by keeping foreign goods out, they could save domestic jobs. In practice, all countries adopted the same mix of measures. World trade collapsed, jobs were lost in export industries and consumers were left having to pay higher prices to inefficient domestic producers when before they could buy goods from overseas at cheaper prices. After the Second World War, there was a general recognition that these protectionist policies had been self-defeating. ...read more.

Middle

These measures to promote free trade were a powerful influence in expanding trade in the post-war period. World merchandise export volumes (manufacturing, agricultural and mining products) rose three times as fast between 1950 and 1998 as world production itself. The Uruguay Round, so called because the first meeting, took place in Uruguay in 1986, differed from previous rounds in that it did not concentrate mainly on trade in manufactured goods. The final treaty in fact covered three main areas, agriculture, textiles and services. The Uruguay deal made a start in dismantling protectionist barriers but, even so, they remain significant. An important part of the deal was that non-tariff barriers, such as quotas, have to be converted in to tariff barriers. This will make the cost of protectionism much more transparent. Textiles have traditionally been highly protected too. This is because the major industrialised countries once had important textile industries of their own which have increasingly come under competitive pressure from Third World countries. ...read more.

Conclusion

The USA and Canada also signed an agreement in 1988 which effectively removed most trade barriers between the two countries. In 1994, this was extended to include Mexico under the North American Free Trade Association (NAFTA) agreement. If this were to carry on, it would be possible to see a world comprised of several large trading blocs, each with common external tariffs and free trade within the bloc. This would contradict the vision of GATT and the WTO which is to remove trade barriers between all countries. It is argued that FTA's are not as successful at reducing overall tariffs and that the WTO should aim to allow only customs unions to be formed. With FTA's, a country can still set their own tariff levels but under a customs union negotiation can take place, and liberal countries would push for a lower common external tariff. This would reduce overall tariffs. Although in recent years the role of the GATT (now WTO) has tired against other hardened guidelines, it should not be underestimated how much their policies have reduced tariffs on a world scale. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful has the WTO been in achieving it’s objectives?

    5 star(s)

    For example, Ben Weland negotiations have led to reductions in industrial and agricultural subsidies, which in turn reduce wasteful over-production. As a further example, a WTO dispute ruling justified a ban on asbestos products on the grounds that WTO agreements do give priority to health and safety over trade.

  2. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    are rather weak. The danger is that RTAs could coalesce into big blocks, competing with each other on the basis of power rather than cooperating on the basis of rules; and particularly putting the squeeze on small and poor countries excluded from preferential access to the markets of the major powers.

  1. Carbon Credit Trading

    On the downside, this alternative does not allow Heinz's sustainability goals to be met, and the corporation may find itself at a loss for experience when a mandatory carbon reduction scheme is implemented in the United States. It is likely that a scheme will come into play in the near future.

  2. Why are Unions set up?

    unjust disparities existing among various sections of Canadian society and among different regions. Human Rights - The Canadian Labour Congress has devoted considerable effort to combatting discrimination and protecting basic human rights. Education - A basic human right, education must be available to all Canadians.

  1. Will trading fairly reduce world poverty?

    or purchase, respectively, of a good, because it is considered to be in the public interest, or justified as such. * Quotas: A quota is a prescribed number or share of something. * Embargo: an embargo is the prohibition of commerce and trade with a certain country, in order to

  2. Is Mexico better off with NAFTA

    As trade obviously increased significantly, how did it this influence Mexican GDP? In the World Bank Report, Lessons from NAFTA for Latin America and the Caribbean Countries: A Summary of Research Findings, it is stated that since Mexico joined NAFTA it has experienced an annual 0.5 to 0.7 per centage growth in GDP.

  1. trading blocs

    For example, France is a member state of the EU who is first partner and its major source of surplus. French exchanges out of the union are relatively concentrated so that eighty percent of the French trade with the industrialized countries is destinated toward OCDE countries including sixty three percent toward EU countries.

  2. Globalisation and Protectionism.

    Also, globalisation leads to the dominance of multi-national corporations (MNCs). These MNCs invest in countries, creating jobs and income as well as improving the infrastructure of the country. Also MNCs can introduce new technology into a country and train the workforce.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work