• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the use of game theory as a tool to explain oligopolistic behaviour

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Evaluate the use of game theory as a tool to explain oligopolistic behaviour (25 marks) An oligopoly is a market structure that consists of a few dominating large firms in a particular industry. Game theory is the theory that explains the interaction between firms and decision that firms make. To some extent, using game theory as a tool to explain oligopolistic behaviour can have limits as the game theory is based on the idea that humans act rationally in making decisions. However, it could be argued that human beings do not act rationally all the time. Therefore, can we completely rely on game theory to use as a tool to explain oligopolistic behaviour? ...read more.

Middle

On the other hand, the game theory is based upon human being acting rationally on behalf of companies through taking calculated risks. However, we have seen in the recent bank crisis that this doesn't seem to be the case. For example, the Royal Bank of Scotland took over ABN AMRO banking group to be more competitive on a global scale, only after the takeover was is realised that ABN AMRO were heavy in toxic debt. Therefore, how can we possibly apply a theory to oligopolistic behaviour such as game theory, based on rationality, when such large and well established institutes behave in a non-rational manner? ...read more.

Conclusion

Understanding this is essential when discussing the game theory. Nevertheless, making a decision on behalf of a company can still carry risks which individuals are willing to take in order to benefit from rewards and bonuses. In other words, although people are capable of acting rationally, they STILL may choose not to under certain circumstances. Therefore, to suggest the game theory can be used as a unique and specific tool to explain oligopolistic behaviour would be wrong as it carries the flaws I have just mentioned. But, to use as an indicator of how oligopolies may behave under certain circumstances against other firms in a particular industry is a suitable tool. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy essays

  1. Explain what you understand by the Private Finance Initiative - Evaluate how successful it ...

    PFI also gets round tough public rules that prevent public bodies raising private cash. The attraction for the private sector is similar to that of a bank, (or building society) providing a mortgage to a homebuyer. They get regular payments for an extended period.

  2. What are the origins of the Pension Crisis and what can be done to ...

    when the workforce was smaller. As in other countries, it is large employers which are most likely to provide occupational pensions; 95% of employers with over 1000 employees provide a form of occupational pension, while only 24% of those with 5 or fewer employees provide one (Smith and Mckay 2002).

  1. Who has benefited most from the takeover of Liverpool football club

    South West - 3.5% (worst in Torbay - 5.6% - 3,000) South East - 3.3% (worst in Thanet - 9.8% - 6,000) http://www.hrmguide.co.uk/jobmarket/regional_unemployment.htm Majority shareholders George Gillett - Age 69 - Estimated worth: �250m Gillett bought the Reds in March for �220m plus �50m of debt, having already invested in many US sports.

  2. The theory of Market Structure

    Instead we operate under a different model of competition known as monopolistic competition. Any time the elements of pure competition are not met the existing model is monopolistic competition.. The fundamental difference between a pure competitor and a monopolistic competitor is that the latter refrains from selling identical products.

  1. The Importance of the Canadian Airline Industry.

    Furthermore, social concerns over safety standards contributed to the decision to regulate the industry. The fear was that, when revenues in an unregulated industry were low, safety standards would be relaxed and problems would occur (Button 55). The failure of specific markets to produce and allocate goods efficiently provided another reason to regulate the industry.

  2. Monopoly: a Game or Reality?

    Take, for instance, the example of public transportation. If the transit industry were to become a monopolistic competition (or even an oligopoly), then a whole new line of transportation routes and methods would sprout up and Toronto's Transit System would become a labyrinth of roads and tunnels.

  1. Economics Report on Budget

    000 more nurses by 2008, funded by the National Insurance increase * Britain's unemployment is lower than the total in Japan and Euro zone and the lowest in the UK for a generation * * Government will make �170m to help people to upgrade their skills and move up the

  2. For a duopoly involving homogeneous products, explain and contrast a Cournot, Stackelberg and Bertrand ...

    Firms 1's reaction curve q1 = R1(q2) shows that the profit maximising output of firm 1 is a function of the output of firm 2. As production costs are zero and the assumed market demand, the specific form of the reaction function is linear over the relevant range R1(q2)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work