• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the roles and place of trade blocs in the global economy.

Extracts from this document...


Economics - Mr. Russell " Free Trade and comparative (economic) advantage are the main justification for international trade." i) Examine the roles and place of trade blocs in the global economy. A trade bloc or free trade area is a group of countries between which there is free trade in goods and services but which allows member countries to set their own level of tariffs against non-member countries. The European Union is the largest multi-national free trade bloc, followed by NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement), MERCOSUR and AFTA (ASEAN free trade area). NAFTA is a free trade agreement involving Canada, Mexico and the USA. Of the free trade unions NAFTA is the most limited, as it is restricted to eliminating tariffs, quotas and other trade impediments amongst the 3 countries involved. There is no common customs or tariff agreement for imported goods and services or any free movement of citizens allowed. It is a very powerful trade bloc, because of the economic and political power of the USA. NAFTA is in the process of becoming a free trade zone, as it has not reached this goal completely, since there are still a number of industries, which receive protection, such as citrus, lumber and Mexican petroleum. ...read more.


Specialisation is increased in the free trade area. A larger market allows countries to allocate their resources in producing goods or services, of which they can produce well, rather than producing them inefficiently when other countries can provide them at lower prices (comparative advantage). For example, in NAFTA, it is clear that in the foreseeable future that Mexico will become the home of assembly industries that use low-cost labour. Such industries include computer parts, automotive and textiles. Mexico will then specialise in manufacturing goods, which will therefore become extremely productive. A drawback to the free trade agreement is interdependency. As countries become more specialised, they become more dependent on their trading partners, meaning that each country will loose some control over its economy. Decisions of foreign countries can then greatly affect decisions in the domestic country. For example, is essential foods are not grown in the domestic economy, or political conflicts take place, or a strike in the manufacturing sector of a company, which is based in another country will surely have an effect other sectors of the firm, which are set in another country. ...read more.


For example, a Japanese firm will pay the tariff to import its goods into France and then it can ship its goods around the EU freely. However, the tariffs increase costs for the Japanese firm, meaning the price of its good may be more expensive in comparison to a homogenous product produced in the EU, and may cause consumers in the EU to buy domestically produced goods rather than the Japanese good. One will then over time be able to see an increase in employment and income. A larger market will give rise to expansions in companies and demand labour at all levels in the company, from manufacturing to distribution. Taking NAFTA as an example, manufacturing and assembly plants will be set up in Mexico, creating job opportunities for Mexicans, and increasing consumption of goods or services for the US or Canadian firm, seeking low-cost labour. The increased income of Mexican workers has increased the consumption of US and Canadian goods and services. This increases employment of high-paying jobs in Canada and the USA. In Mexico, Canada and the USA, income will have risen and in the long run so will economic growth and the standard of living. Bianca Ren´┐Ż 1 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ESSAY: Fair trade or free trade?

    5 star(s)

    MNC's are using the poor countries to get lowest cost of production as much as they can. Poor countries are directly the slaves of MNC. At a trade level, the biggest banana producer ( Chiquita ) objected to the less 10 percent share of the European market reserved for the thousand of producers in the Caribbean.

  2. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    Of the rest, 9 articles sanction more-or-less detailed means of evading market access obligations (e.g. import quotas on balance of payments and infant industry grounds, safeguards, anti-dumping and countervailing duties, general waivers, waivers on national security and other public policy grounds, customs unions and free trade areas).

  1. Analyse the reasons for reducing protection and its impact on the domestic and ...

    Embracing free trade has therefore had positive extensive long term impacts on the domestic economy. However, reducing protection levels may also have a number of negative impacts on a domestic economy such as Australia. Firstly, domestic 'infant industries' may not be able to establish themselves in the world market as they are unable to compete against large foreign competitors.

  2. Will trading fairly reduce world poverty?

    Wealthier countries typically provide aid to economically developing countries. (Source: Wikipedia) There are different types of Aid, which help the poor in many ways. Emergency/Humanitarian Aid is fast assistance given to people in immediate distress by individuals, organisations, or governments to relieve suffering, during and after man-made emergencies (like wars)

  1. Is Mexico better off with NAFTA

    Mexico managed to recover from this quite fast compared to the 1982 crisis and by 1997; it was almost back at pre-crisis levels of GDP and investments. Looking back, this was much due to NAFTA which promoted credibility to the reforms Mexico implemented.

  2. trading blocs

    For example, France is a member state of the EU who is first partner and its major source of surplus. French exchanges out of the union are relatively concentrated so that eighty percent of the French trade with the industrialized countries is destinated toward OCDE countries including sixty three percent toward EU countries.

  1. Chile: Better of Joining NAFTA or MERCOSUR?

    Since the late 1980s, Chile has maintained a relatively flexible system of foreign exchange. The country's central bank intervenes in the currency market to keep the peso's exchange rate competitive against a basket of currencies including the dollar, the German mark, and the yen.

  2. Assess the economic effects of the growth of trading blocs on the global economy

    An example of this is that European steel companies such as Mittal will struggle to sell their goods in the United States because they put up such a high tariff even though the US is such a large market. Many companies may struggle to expand business on a global scale as a result of the tariffs.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work