• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Expansionary monetary policy is not the main explanation of either the turning point or the extent of the economic recovery in the 1930s Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


"Expansionary monetary policy is not the main explanation of either the turning point or the extent of the economic recovery in the 1930s" Discuss. This essay will argue that monetary policy was important to starting the recovery in the early 1930s, but is by no means the explanation for the extent of the recovery, which relied on fiscal policy and the growth of the manufacturing sector to keep going through the late 1930s. Worswick (1984) wrote that 'spontaneous forces alone will not count for the recovery. Policy made important contributions.' According to Worswick, and in line with much of the literature, the abandonment of gold and the depreciation of sterling were key to economic recovery. After Britain abandoned the gold standard in 1931, a managed floating exchange rate was adopted, in order to give British exports a competitive edge, this being the first way in which monetary policy contributed to recovery. The success of this stimulus to exports, however, was negligible. As sterling fell from �1=$4.86 to a low of �1=$3.24, exports did grow, and finally stabilised in 1932, despite continuing to fall in the continent, but it is estimated to have contributed very little to the recovery. Although exports initially rose by 24% in the last quarter of 1932, thanks to the depreciation of sterling, this was not maintained for the rest of the decade. ...read more.


In turn, Broadberry (1986) allocates about 50% of the rise in housing investment in 1931-1933 to the advent of 'cheap money', and hence monetary policy. Monetary policy, therefore, impacted strongly on residential investment, as well as supporting the recovery of the commercial and industrial sectors, ultimately leading to economic recovery. Therefore, by stimulating the housing sector, monetary policy could be seen as a vital factor in explaining the turning point in the 1930s, when economic recovery finally began. Although monetary policy can be helpful in explaining how the recovery phase began, it does not suffice in explaining the extent of the recovery for several reasons. First of all, by mid 1933, investment in housing slowed down in comparison to other sectors, such as manufacturing and transport, which were growing at an average of 14% throughout 1937. These new manufacturing and transport industries were providing one third of all new jobs by 1937, and thus powering the recovery. Secondly, although rising government spending on goods and services was only a small feature of the recovery in its early stages, it formed a very significant stimulus to recovery from 1935 onwards, with the rapid growth of expenditure on rearmament ensuring that the 1937-1938 recession was of short duration and that the economy was growing rapidly by the eve of the Second World War. ...read more.


As noted by Mowat (1955), "The deflationary phase of the National government's policy was short-lived . . . [their] financial policies made the best of both worlds; they seemed sufficiently deflationary to restore confidence; they were in fact sufficiently inflationary to assist recovery by maintaining the purchasing power of the people." However, had the recovery not commenced, cheap money not been successfully implemented, and fiscal window-dressing not deployed extensively, then the year would almost certainly have closed with a substantial deficit. As it was, a deficit of �32.3m (0.9 per cent of GDP) was posted, but this was not corrosive of confidence in the way that it would have been even 12 months earlier, and by the following year a surplus of almost the same sum was achieved. Thereafter, for the next 3 years, recovery in the public finances tracked recovery in the real economy, providing scope thereby for tax remissions and a resumption of expenditure growth. We can therefore conclude that although expansionary monetary policy helped to start the recovery in the early 1930s, it is by no means the main explanation for the extent of the recovery. Monetary policy stimulated recovery via the housing market in the early 30s, but it was a combination of growth in the manufacturing sector post 1933 and fiscal policy, especially post 1935, which contributed to keeping the recovery on track and speeding up the growth of GDP. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Macroeconomics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Macroeconomics essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Fiscal and monetary policy - a comparison

    4 star(s)

    Since investment spending results in a larger capital stock, then incomes in the future will also be higher through the impact on LRAS. Fiscal policy expansion An expansion in fiscal policy (i.e. an increase in government spending) adds directly to AD but if financed by higher government borrowing, this may result in higher interest rates and lower investment.

  2. Comparing the effects of immigration on GDP in Malaysia, Japan and South Africa.

    The GDP has increased from 1,272,537 R million to 1,415,273 R million in year 2004. During the period of time, the population has increased by 1.17%. At the same time, the number of documented immigrants has increased 1.27%. However, the unemployment rate has decreased 11.41%.

  1. How have the Rates of Inflation in the UK Changed Since the Monetary Policy ...

    It is this type of spending which causes the inflation and then the inability to control it which leads to continuing. This does not show any real differences to way the two have interacted since the MPC took over but as there have never been any real tests to the

  2. Budget 2004-05 and Economic Analysis of Pakistan

    is estimated at Rs 423836 million which is 60.5% of the current expenditure. * The provincial share in federal receipts is estimated at Rs 239157 million during 2004-2005 which is 13.12% higher than the revised estimates for 2003-2004. * The size of Public Sector Development Programme for 2004-2005 is Rs 202000 million.

  1. Governments set economic objectives - Discuss the relative importance of each of these objectives ...

    Supply side policies can be used to directly target a particular type of unemployment. The government can deal with frictional unemployment by improving the flow of information to unemployed workers, thus improving employment services. Additionally, by reducing the benefits of the short-term unemployed and improving the mobility of labour, frictional unemployment can be reduced.

  2. Greece financial crisis: The main causes of this crisis are? What are ...

    This led to a dramatic increase in consumer spending, which gave a significant boost to economic growth. Between1997-2007, Greece averaged 4% GDP growth, almost twice the European Union (EU) average. As with other European countries, the financial crisis and resulting slowdown of the real economy have taken their toll on Greece's rate of growth, which slowed to 2.0% in 2008.

  1. To what extent does the government budget/statement reflect current government priorities?

    I shall compare what was spent on those sectors in the year 2006 and compare that with the budget released in 2007. Taking into account inflation, which from 2006 to 2007 was 3% I can work out whether spending, has increased by a lot, remained the same or dropped.

  2. Critically examine the hypothesis that economic recovery in the 1930s was based upon the ...

    However, the depreciation can only easily explain the tendency for a rise in exports, and hence economic recovery, until 1936. After 1936, British exports continued to rise, despite remaining stagnant on the Continent, even though sterling appreciated sharply in 1933-1934, as a result of the depreciation of the American dollar.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work