• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Free Trade Makes Sense for Everyone

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Free Trade Makes Sense for Everyone Bruce D. Hill ECBU 520, Seminar in Economics Instructor: Dr. Richard P. O'Toole February 28, 2004 Free Trade Makes Sense for Everyone Introduction For the purposes of this paper, I have chosen to write about the issues involved around free trade and globalization as opposed to protectionism. This topic deals with the trade off between polar views of free trade and protectionism. The "free traders", believe by removing the barriers to trade (tariffs and quotas) the United States will reap the benefits that are generated by the "Comparative Advantage" economic model. On the other side of the coin, there are those that feel a "protectionist" economic policy will save the country from loosing jobs to those countries on which we impose trading tariffs and quotas. While this position does protect some American workers from being replaced by foreign workers, it keeps productivity low, keeps demand for U.S. goods low, keeps other workers from employment, and keeps U.S. consumers from purchasing lower cost goods. These are the two polar arguments to the free trade issue. The "free traders" argument is based on viable economic theory-as well as data from free trade agreements in place that show all of the benefits achieved-while the "protectionist" argument cannot be shown using any economic model (although they do use an economic argument). ...read more.

Middle

These new workers will have additional income to spend thereby increasing the demand for goods causing further expansion in industry. However, they leave out all of the negatives that this type of policy would foster. If we impose tariffs and quotas on our trading partners, they in turn will do the same. This will lead to less demand for domestic goods abroad, which, will lead to lower production, and fewer jobs. Additionally, fewer domestic products will be demanded by our trading partners. This is because those products they have been exporting will be in less demand and workers will be laid off, which will lead to less income thereby decreasing demand for our products. What ultimately happens is that there is a trade off in employed workers in protected industries while those in non-protected industries (exporters) are loosing their jobs. Furthermore, we have kept U.S. consumers from enjoying goods and services at the best price in order to protect some jobs at the expense of others. In addition, because of the lack of competition, those protected industries have no reason to become more efficient thereby leading to less productivity. As I stated earlier, since the "protectionist" cannot prove their position with any economic model or data, they have leaned toward moral arguments to shore up their position. ...read more.

Conclusion

My position on the issue of globalization and free trade is that we-the U.S.-should embrace them. I am not completely ambivalent to those who are loosing their jobs due to trade. I feel that we should have (and we do) some type of social safety net in place for those individuals for such a time that they can be retrained to take a job that industries in this country are more efficient at doing. However, with that caveat, I must say that we should look forward to trading freely with other countries so that we, the consumers and producers of this country, can reap the benefits created by doing so. I truly believe that this country has always-and will-rise to the occasion, and become better off in the long-run if we accept the free trade position. 1 Is Free Trade Immoral? (Feb 26, 2004). Wall Street Journal (Eastern Edition ), p. A.10 New York, N.Y. Retrieved February 28, 2004 ,from ABI/INFORM Global database. (Accession no.:551335341). 2 Is Free Trade Immoral? (Feb 26, 2004). Wall Street Journal (Eastern Edition ), p. A.10 New York, N.Y. Retrieved February 28, 2004 ,from ABI/INFORM Global database. (Accession no.:551335341). 3 At this moment, corporations are outsourcing services for cheaper labor costs, however, it is yet to be seen, whether all of the outsourced services are meeting the needs of the consumer. Some of these jobs may come back to domestic workers. Free Trade 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ESSAY: Fair trade or free trade?

    5 star(s)

    search for a new product to develop and the cycle will be repeated. In a few words, international trade increases the technology development as a whole (in rich countries first and poorest after). This is called "technology transfer". When a foreign firm manufactures a product, the local firms are obliged to adapt, innovate and improve their product.

  2. CRITICALLY EVALUATE THE THEORIES OF ABSOLUTE ADVANTAGE (ADAM SMITH MODEL) AND COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE (DAVID ...

    If these two countries specialise in their comparative advantage good, then world production rises for both goods. Increased output occurs even though there is no increase in the amount of labour input in the world, thus, the example demonstrates that specialisation can raise world production efficiency.

  1. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    The OECD countries have gradually opened their markets further, consolidating the liberalisation of trade and capital controls since the late 1940s. Among the developed countries, Australia and New Zealand were exceptional in, first, cleaving to high protection for so long, and then liberalising fast and radically from the early/mid 1980s.

  2. Will trading fairly reduce world poverty?

    The World Trade Organization (WTO) is an international body whose purpose is to promote free trade by persuading countries to abolish import tariffs and other barriers. As such, it has become closely associated with globalisation. The World Trade Organization (WTO)

  1. Does Trade Benefit Everyone?

    Brazil can produce coffee better than the UK and the UK can produce cars better than Brazil, so even though the UK has absolute advantage in both it holds its comparative advantage in cars. It should therefore specialise in car production and trade all surplus supply for coffee.

  2. Carbon Credit Trading

    Centralize Manufacturing Facilities Another alternative would be to centralize manufacturing facilities in a developing country that is already under the Kyoto Protocol. Heinz would be able to enjoy economies of scale and lower labour costs, reducing overall manufacturing costs. Heinz U.K.'s knowledge through its experience in the carbon market would

  1. International Trade - I have been asked to investigate the possibility of a company ...

    due to the talibans and their strict regime that they put people through and this was not good as the government was also heavily intimidated by Osama Bin Laden and his crew. As the events of September the 11th grew it affected the country vastly as the person responsible for

  2. Colonial legacy

    Africa was the last frontier of white colonialism. At the close of world war II, the European powers - Britian, France, Belguim, Portugal and Spain still held firmaly on their colonies, which collectively encompassed viturally the entire African continent. However, this was soon to change with the awakening of African Nationalism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work