• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Globalisation should not be resisted.' What do you think?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Globalisation should not be resisted.' What do you think? Globalisation has become one of the most debated issues around the globe. This is because globalisation is happening, and it involves everyone. The fact that globalisation could be applied in many aspects also makes it inescapable. Globalisation could be deemed as the opening up of markets, an integration of ideas from all over the globe, and the sharing of influences or even a global, united movement. Although it is true that globalisation could generate negative effects, the good things about globalisation should not be discounted. Globalisation could bring benefits to the political world, and the economic arena. It also allows the sharing of cultures and ideas. The fact that globalisation is a by-product of technological advances also makes resistance futile. Thus, I believe that globalisation should not be resisted entirely. Firstly, with globalisation, the political world would be more stable and may prove beneficial to all. Globalisation would enable political leaders to act together for the benefit of all, instead of acting unilaterally. Leaders would soon realise that the fate of their country would also depend on the well-being of other nations. A globalised world would be one where countries are interdependent on each other. ...read more.

Middle

In order to withstand the test of globalisation, it should not oppose it, but find a new place in society. I believe ideas to resist globalisation in order to preserve our cultural heritage cannot stand. However, I also believe that it is up to the people to preserve and adapt their culture in a new environment, instead of being sanguine about it. Proper measures have to be initiated, for instance promoting Chinese New Year for the Chinese or Hari Raya Aidiladha for the Muslims. In this sense, globalisation should be given resistance only to buy time for people to prepare their culture to face the onslaught of globalisation. Furthermore, globalisation may induce democracy where it is practiced. Nations governing democratically have laws that respect the people's rights, opinions and freedom. Globalisation is, in effect a practice of democracy free trade and freedom. Countries led by dictators are the least open and have the least freedom. These countries, like Sudan, Zimbabwe, Liberia, Cuba and so on, are also the most hostile to globalisation, openness and trade in goods and services. And for good reason - these dictators or those with authoritarian power fear that their power may be undermined as the people begin to realise and long for the freedom of democracy. ...read more.

Conclusion

Thus, in desperation, forests and wildlife sanctuaries would have to be sacrificed to allocate the ever-growing numbers of people. Space will then be at a premium. However, it will be the large companies and the rich that will benefit as they have the money and model to invest and buy land for their purposes. This then leaves no room for the poor, who would consequently remain so as they cannot compete with those with larger amounts of money. Thus, the abuse of globalisation may benefit only the rich and not the poor. It is true that globalisation has its negative effects. However, if integrated with care, it may well prove to be a boon instead of a bane. Globalisation can benefit nations politically, economically and culturally. Ideas of resistance would ring a nation nowhere, as globalisation is needed for a nation to compete at the international stage. Globalisation could lead to the triumph of democracy over autocracy. In the end, it is happening now, if not already. The large scope that globalisation encompasses makes it an unevitable process. What is ironic is that while protesters fight against globalistion efforts in the name of Africans and the world's poor, Africans themselves may well want it to go their way. Thus, I strongly believe that globalisation should not be resisted, but should be embraced as its advantages outweigh the disadvantages. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Discuss the extent to which globalisation has been beneficial to Africa, China, America or ...

    5 star(s)

    The key to this is that China brought in the right institutions, the preconditions for growth and gave incentives for the growth of investment and free markets. Thus private enterprise produced the products consumers wanted around the world and so could compete very well with its low cost, educated labour force.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Advantages and disadvantages of Globalisation. Need for development.

    4 star(s)

    In reality western dominated Globalisation imposes barriers against free trade from 3rd world exports protecting western industry, multinationals and farmers. Some uncontrolled MNCs may damage the environment and use child labour as some ldc governments may be weak or corrupt and let them.

  1. To what extent has globalisation been benefical to China's economic growth?

    finding the products that they can produce most effectively and processes that keep costs to minimum. When China applied to join the GATT in 1986, it was essentially a centrally planned economy with a dense trading regime and high tariffs.

  2. A Study of Globalisation - A study of multinationals and their effect on our ...

    they still ultimately increased these countries abilities to trade and to become technologically independent. In the 20th Century infrastructure, technology, health and education systems implemented by the world powers, in developing and developed countries, has improved the overall quality of life for people worldwide, this does not include Africa.

  1. To what extent has globalisation created a 'borderless world'?

    Which outcome results depends on the policies adopted by national governments, international institutions as well as society itself. To its fiercest critics, globalisation, the march of international capitalism, is a force for oppression, exploitation and injustice. The rage that drove the terrorists to committing their obscene crime was in part, it is argued, a response to that.

  2. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    with judicial restraint. This is indeed a principle enshrined in the Uruguay Round agreements establishing the WTO and the new dispute settlement procedures.76 The Dispute Settlement Body simply does not enjoy the political consensus to sustain "creative" judicial interpretations of legal texts and policy driven by litigation, as happens from

  1. How the process of Globalisation might have affected the position of labour in industrialized ...

    AA assumes that everyone benefits when countries produce and sell freely what they do best. Ricardo focused on differences in labour productivities. CA presumes if a country is less productive at producing everything, then it must specialise in what it does relatively better than the others, then trade would be also beneficial.

  2. Write a written report on Globalisation

    This has essentially cut down globally sourced products or services that are predominant in countries like China, Vietnam and India where labour intensive manufactured products produced low-cost labour. Therefore, globalisation has made the sourcing of inputs to adapt these efficiencies like; low cost skilled labour, low cost raw material and other economic factors like tax breaks and low trade tariffs.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work