• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Globalisation should not be resisted.' What do you think?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Globalisation should not be resisted.' What do you think? Globalisation has become one of the most debated issues around the globe. This is because globalisation is happening, and it involves everyone. The fact that globalisation could be applied in many aspects also makes it inescapable. Globalisation could be deemed as the opening up of markets, an integration of ideas from all over the globe, and the sharing of influences or even a global, united movement. Although it is true that globalisation could generate negative effects, the good things about globalisation should not be discounted. Globalisation could bring benefits to the political world, and the economic arena. It also allows the sharing of cultures and ideas. The fact that globalisation is a by-product of technological advances also makes resistance futile. Thus, I believe that globalisation should not be resisted entirely. Firstly, with globalisation, the political world would be more stable and may prove beneficial to all. Globalisation would enable political leaders to act together for the benefit of all, instead of acting unilaterally. Leaders would soon realise that the fate of their country would also depend on the well-being of other nations. A globalised world would be one where countries are interdependent on each other. ...read more.

Middle

In order to withstand the test of globalisation, it should not oppose it, but find a new place in society. I believe ideas to resist globalisation in order to preserve our cultural heritage cannot stand. However, I also believe that it is up to the people to preserve and adapt their culture in a new environment, instead of being sanguine about it. Proper measures have to be initiated, for instance promoting Chinese New Year for the Chinese or Hari Raya Aidiladha for the Muslims. In this sense, globalisation should be given resistance only to buy time for people to prepare their culture to face the onslaught of globalisation. Furthermore, globalisation may induce democracy where it is practiced. Nations governing democratically have laws that respect the people's rights, opinions and freedom. Globalisation is, in effect a practice of democracy free trade and freedom. Countries led by dictators are the least open and have the least freedom. These countries, like Sudan, Zimbabwe, Liberia, Cuba and so on, are also the most hostile to globalisation, openness and trade in goods and services. And for good reason - these dictators or those with authoritarian power fear that their power may be undermined as the people begin to realise and long for the freedom of democracy. ...read more.

Conclusion

Thus, in desperation, forests and wildlife sanctuaries would have to be sacrificed to allocate the ever-growing numbers of people. Space will then be at a premium. However, it will be the large companies and the rich that will benefit as they have the money and model to invest and buy land for their purposes. This then leaves no room for the poor, who would consequently remain so as they cannot compete with those with larger amounts of money. Thus, the abuse of globalisation may benefit only the rich and not the poor. It is true that globalisation has its negative effects. However, if integrated with care, it may well prove to be a boon instead of a bane. Globalisation can benefit nations politically, economically and culturally. Ideas of resistance would ring a nation nowhere, as globalisation is needed for a nation to compete at the international stage. Globalisation could lead to the triumph of democracy over autocracy. In the end, it is happening now, if not already. The large scope that globalisation encompasses makes it an unevitable process. What is ironic is that while protesters fight against globalistion efforts in the name of Africans and the world's poor, Africans themselves may well want it to go their way. Thus, I strongly believe that globalisation should not be resisted, but should be embraced as its advantages outweigh the disadvantages. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Advantages and disadvantages of Globalisation. Need for development.

    4 star(s)

    The economists Stiglitz (chief economist World bank and Nobel prize winner in 2001) led the attack in his book "globalisation and its discontents" Globalisation in its present reality is often bad because of western power and also weak governments in the 3rd world.

  2. The Impact of Globalisation upon the Japanese Economy

    Globalisation has had a negative impact on Japan's labour market, however it also poses the greatest opportunities for Japan to recover, as it can source its labour from externally, and if it can become more efficient and trade more it will boost its growth.

  1. Has globalisation widened or narrowed the gulf between rich and poor countries

    The neo-liberal point on inequality is that it is due to other reasons such as political instability and corrupt regimes. Political instability is a common feature of politics in many countries of the "South". Many wars since 1945 have occurred in Third World countries for example in China, India, Nigeria and Rwanda.

  2. To what extent has globalisation been benefical to China's economic growth?

    Its main trading partners were socialist countries such as the USSR and Yugoslavia. It was not until 1992 when China declared its intention to establish a "socialist market economy" that it began to lower tariffs. During this time, China began to make substantial tariff cuts.

  1. A Study of Globalisation - A study of multinationals and their effect on our ...

    These empires built an infrastructure in developing countries; railways, ports and beautifully constructed colonial buildings were just some of the benefits these developing countries could take advantage of. Even though these commodities weren't built for the benefit of the developing country (they were built for British trade)

  2. To what extent has globalisation created a 'borderless world'?

    Flows of goods, capital and labour increased dramatically. Exports relative to world income nearly doubled to about 8%. Sixty million people migrated from Europe to North America and other parts of the new world. The total labour flows during the first wave of globalisation were nearly 10% of the world's population.

  1. "What do sociologists mean by the term 'Globalisation' and how have they tried to ...

    Society around the world is now using the same products which once were only sold in one country. Food from different continents is an example which is also now extending from one country into others, eg the McDonalds restaurant. Most sociologists have recognised that it is the transnational corporations that

  2. Corruption and Globalisation - Both of them have been so pervasive in recent years. ...

    - Lack of independent control agencies. Since there is no oversight, corruption goes unabashed. - Absence of dependable legal machinery for preventing arbitrary application of regulations and laws. When the legal system fails, it becomes a hot bed for corruption, as there are no penalties for misuse of funds and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work