• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

Governments set economic objectives - Discuss the relative importance of each of these objectives - Can governments meet all these targets at once

Extracts from this document...


Q. Governments set economic objectives. Discuss the relative importance of each of these objectives (discussed so far). Can governments meet all these targets at once? The economic objectives the UK government aims to achieve, which have been discussed so far, include maintaining a low level of unemployment, price stability and steady level of inflation and high yet sustainable levels of economic growth. Each economic objective will be analysed in turn and discover its importance in the UK economy. Unemployment measures the amount of people that are actively seeking employment at a point in time. Typically in the UK, unemployment is measured by the number of people claiming benefits, even though there are other techniques of measuring unemployment. Equilibrium in the labour market exists when the demand for labour is equal to the supply of labour. Figure 1.0 - Labour market in equilibrium Even in equilibrium, there may be some level of unemployment, such as frictional and search unemployment, seasonal unemployment and structural unemployment. Sometimes, the labour market moves out of the equilibrium. Figure 2.0 - Disequilibrium in the labour market In Figure 2.0, the wage rate is above the market clearing wage rate, P, thus, causing fewer workers to be demanded by employers because the wage rate is too high, yet an extension in the supply of workers because the wage rate is so high. This has resulted in unemployment, which is the distance from QD1 to QS1. If the wage rate fell back to price P, then the labour market would be back in equilibrium as firms would demand more workers and some workers would have dropped out of the labour market, not working due to the lower wage rates. There are several types of unemployment: cyclical, real wage [also known as classical], frictional and search, seasonal, structural and voluntary. Cyclical unemployment is closely linked to the business cycle. Figure 3.0 - The business cycle There are four parts to the business cycle: the boom/peak, recession, slump and recovery/expansion. ...read more.


In the late 1980s, the Conservative government used the Monetarist view of controlling inflation. It did lead to a fall in inflation, however, it lead to a fall in output and employment and thus not favourable to people. Inflation occurs because increases in the money supply are over and above the real rate of growth in the economy - see Figure 9.0 overleaf. Figure 9.0 - Increase in aggregate demand leading to an increase in the price level The government imposes tight monetary policy. A restrictive monetary policy means that there will be a fall in the supply of money relative to the demand for money. They will try to increase the amount of money they hold by selling non-monetary assets or by borrowing money. This increase demand for funds will lead to interest rates rising, which reduces consumption and investment. The imposition of a tight monetary policy means that money supply is now less than the demand for money. Figure 10.0 - Liquidity preference [demand for money] after imposition of monetary policy The fall in demand for money has now caused consumption and investment expenditure to fall. The restrictive monetary policy leads to a fall in aggregate demand, therefore reducing inflation. The demand for money now equals the supply of money. Figure 11.0 - Fall in aggregate demand after imposition of monetary policy Monetarists argue that controlling inflation is relatively simple to do, however governments prefer not to use this method as it can cause unemployment and low growth, thus not good for the political party to gain votes. Keynesians argue that controlling the money supply is not always the best method of controlling inflation as they argue that there is no precise relationship between the money supply and inflation. Tight monetary policy can also lead to increased inflation in the short run [raising interest rates will lead to higher mortgage repayments, therefore inflationary]. ...read more.


In other words, they want continual, reasonable growth that never ignites inflation, perhaps 2.5% - 3% per annum. Notice that the growth rate has been over 2% without getting out of hand for six years. Following the 'bust/boom/bust' of the 'early 80s/late 80s/early 90s', this is quite an achievement. Inflation has also been remarkably subdued by historical standards. Following the horribly inflationary 1970s [peaked at 25%] and the near 10% figure ten years ago, RPIX has been growing at 3% per annum or less for six years. The goal of full employment has effectively been consigned to the history books. Unemployment reached one million in the 1980s for the first time since the 1930s, and then proceeded to reach 3 million [or 4 million, depending on the definition] within three years. Having said that, 'full employment' does not mean that everyone has a job. Even in the 'full employment' era of the 1950s there were still 300,000 unemployed. Today's figure is falling towards one million which some consider to be fairly close to full employment given the large amount of structural unemployment. This fall has been possible due to supply-side reforms of the Conservative governments of the 1980s and the increased flexibility of the UK labour market, both of which have reduced the number of structurally unemployed people. If one had to pick the most important objective today, it would have to be inflation. Although it should be growth, all government's efforts are devoted to the control of inflation. If this goal is missed, it is felt the goal of higher growth will not be attainable either. However, "prevention is better than cure". Inflation is cumulative: that is, say inflation for January 2002 was 1.8% and by September 2002 it was 1.6%, this does not mean that prices have fallen. It means that prices are simply not rising as quickly as they were compared to January 2002. It would require deflationary measures to lower the price level. The government can only stop prices rising so quickly, but preventing them rising so rapidly is what the government is aiming for. Alison Ng 13JK 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Macroeconomics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Macroeconomics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Discuss the benefits of economic growth

    5 star(s)

    However, this does not necessarily mean that the economic growth of the UK at the current time is a good thing.

  2. Peer reviewed

    How can inflation be reduced?

    5 star(s)

    as it has been the most effective and is the most immediate. Monetary policy does have flaws though when trying to overcome inflation. One major problem is that its overused, in a time of crisis banks tend to immediately raise interest rates to try and avert the crisis.

  1. Peer reviewed

    To what extent is inflation a serious economic problem.

    5 star(s)

    Price AS2 AS1 AD Output Inflation is regarded to be a problem in many economists' eyes. Employees' expectations have an important role in inflation. If employees expect inflation they will ask for an increase in wages thus causing inflation that they expected.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Discuss the extent to which a reduction in the rate of interest can be ...

    4 star(s)

    Lower interest rates would mean to businesses that rate of return from banks or financial institutions will be much lower than the return from investment projects. Increases in aggregate demand, shown below, will be a catalyst for further rounds of investments as due to the accelerator model, firms will have

  1. Bangladesh. Most government aim for full employment and stable prices. Which of those two ...

    For the peasants the burden was too great and hence many were discouraged to borrow and increase their output. This also means that they would not hire more labour to help in the yield. Hence, keeping prices stable at low rates also means that there would be higher unemployment in Bangladesh.

  2. What are the government objectives? Explain why each is important and how the government ...

    The government could also reduce unemployment levels by the reduction of immobilities, especially where structural unemployment is present in which changes in the pattern of demand for certain goods and services has resulted in certain industries becoming less active, shipbuilding being a primary example.

  1. What are the Government's main economic objectives?

    Firstly the government could increase investment in physical capital. This may mean direct investment into infrastructure or alternatively offering incentives to those companies who operate above efficiency/productivity standards. The second option is to invest in human capital to increase the workforce's productivity.

  2. Budget 2004-05 and Economic Analysis of Pakistan

    Dollar Bearer Certificates -5 -25 -25 Special US Dollar Bonds -12500 -6000 -5000 o Floating Debt 15600 27600 30100 Treasury Bills 0 2000 2600 Prize Bonds 15600 25600 27500 * Public Account 53651 -11374 457 Saving Schemes 44620 -18745 -5610 G.P.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work