• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Has globalisation widened or narrowed the gulf between rich and poor countries

Extracts from this document...


Has globalisation widened or narrowed the gulf between rich and poor countries? In 1981, the Brandt Commission reported on world development and concluded that the world consisted of two parts: a wealthy "North" in which a large proportion of the world's wealth was concentrated and a poorer "South" which contains two-thirds of the global population but a smaller proportion of the world's wealth.1 Figure 1 The North-South Divide as shown by the Brandt Commission in 1981 According to Keohane and Nye globalisation refers to "the process by which globalism becomes increasingly thick"2 and globalism has a number of dimensions. So therefore if we are looking at how far globalisation has affected the gap between the developed world and the developing world then it is important to specify which type of globalism that is being referred to. The focus of my essay will be economic globalism and to what extent this has widened or narrowed the gulf between rich and poor countries. This is because the disparity between rich and poor countries is most apparent in terms of wealth. There are two views of globalisation and inequality. The Washington Consensus is the neo-liberal celebration of globalisation and it sees globalisation as a cure to global inequality because it allows wealth to expand to poorer countries. ...read more.


Also the concentration of investment in these countries has increased by 12 per cent since 1967."5 There are several reasons, which explain why developed countries perform better in the global economy some of which support neo-liberalist views and others, which support socialist views. Firstly international trade has posed challenges for developing countries but yet it is also the key to economic prosperity. Most African nations are dependent on the success of one or two primary commodities for their economy. On the other hand developed nations are able to produce a diverse range of goods and services. Therefore, they do not rely on just one industry or good. "Thus, a trade gap increases inequality because developed countries produce goods and services that fetch much more money than what developing countries produce."6 Also rich countries, particularly the United States of America and countries of the European Union, impose tariffs on goods being imported from poorer countries in order to protect their own domestic markets. What makes countries of the "North" benefit most from globalisation is that they have free markets for exports because many are part of trading blocs, such as the North American Free Trade Association (NAFTA), which allow countries to trade freely without paying tariffs on goods produced within the same bloc. ...read more.


There is more than enough evidence to support the two opposing views of globalisation and inequality. Both views remain valid. Whilst it is true that free markets and liberalisation are crucial to bring countries economic growth it is also true that governments need to be stable enough and must meet certain conditions to embrace globalisation: "Capital moves almost instantaneously into countries with stable governments, progressive economies, open accounting and honest dealing, and out of countries lacking those qualities...Countries wishing to attract capital and to gain the benefits of today's and tomorrow's technology must don the "golden straitjacket", a package of policies including balanced budgets, economic deregulation, openness to investment and trade, and a stable currency."9 On the other hand it is also true that globalisation has enabled new forms of domination to operate. Most evidence however shows that the gap between rich and poor countries is far from narrowing. If anything rich countries are becoming richer whilst many poor countries are remaining poor or becoming poorer. There are exceptions to this and these are countries of South East Asia and some in Central and South America, such as Brazil and Venezuela, whose economies developed a strong manufacturing industrial base in the 1970s. Therefore whether globalisation has widened or narrowed the gap between rich and poor countries it depends on which country is being referred to. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Discuss the extent to which globalisation has been beneficial to Africa, China, America or ...

    5 star(s)

    This was helped by globalisation as China was able to sell it's output abroad and also purchase various machinery and technology as they earned foreign currency. China could have looked at the UK and USA's policies and how their government worked and thought that they needed to have that as well, this is on of the effects of globalisation.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Advantages and disadvantages of Globalisation. Need for development.

    4 star(s)

    We do not let today's LDCs follow the protectionist route that most MDCs followed when they first established their infant industries to gain long run potential (CA), and capital controls to prevent macro-instability. Do not forget that the NICS gained much from globalisation and multinationals in every way.

  1. Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye have described international relations as exhibiting 'complex interdependence'. What ...

    The US government could of course have stopped this from happening but due to the complex levels of linkages between US-Canadian trade issues they knew that it would be in their long run interest to hold their tongues and use it to their advantage at a later date.

  2. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    US proposal to reduce trade-distorting domestic subsidies (by $100bn to 5 per cent of agricultural production), bring down peak tariffs to 15 per cent, and abolish export subsidies by 2010. The Cairns Group came up with a similarly radical proposal.

  1. Corruption and Globalisation - Both of them have been so pervasive in recent years. ...

    (Neelankavil, 2003) But, these four countries are also among the most corrupt in the world, which will result in an inefficient world economy. Price and quality of finished goods are also affected in countries where there is high-level of corruption.

  2. Globalisation of GAP

    We find ways to put into balance things that seem to be at odds-work and life, commerce and social responsibility, rapid response and a planful approach. One of the main aims for a business is to grow, once a business has achieved this in it's own market expanding into foreign markets can be very expensive but profitable.

  1. Discuss Globalization.

    (Scott 97:258) Opponents of globalization argue that it facilitates an increase in the amount of discrimination and other abuses of human rights occurring in public domains. The technical difficulty of regulating the content of messages makes the internet a particularly effective means of misusing freedom of expression.

  2. Why has GDP growth been so slow in Somalia?

    The same stands for public goods. If the Somali government was trying to implement street lights to reduce crime, it would be less expensive if the population was urbanized, as fewer lights would be needed. Dense populations can also provide economies of scale.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work