• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that the economic position of the peasantry in Russiawas stronger in the period between the Emancipation and the Revolution than it was under Lenin and Stalin?

Extracts from this document...


Thursday, 3rd October 2003 Jad Salfiti A2 History Coursework: Unit 5c 'The Making of Modern Russia', 1856-1964 b) How far do you agree that the economic position of the peasantry in Russia was stronger in the period between the Emancipation and the Revolution than it was under Lenin and Stalin? Agricultural policy in Russia throughout Russia between 1856 and 1964 has always been characterised by a hidden agenda. The Tsars used agricultural policy to obstruct a revolution, while Stalin used agricultural policy to facilitate industrialisation. The peasantry were limited in reaping the benefits from agricultural policies introduced by either regime. However, while both governments used agricultural policies to sustain their power, the Communist regime under Lenin and Stalin was significantly more ruthless than the former. The Tsarist regime needed the peasants on side in order to block latent revolutionary threat. Therefore, it can be said the peasants were in a better economic position under the Tsars than the Communist regime. Additionally after the emancipation, the peasantry no longer existed because of egalitarianism. In 1861 Tsar Alexander II introduced the first economic policy 'intended' to benefit the peasantry. The Emancipation Edict was a mechanism implemented to free all serfs, who made up more than one third of the total population. ...read more.


As a result of the NEP, production revived quickly, industrial production reaching the pre-war level by 1926, and although more slowly, agricultural production grew. Moreover, peasants were even allowed to sell some surplus and pay tax; some peasants became rich such as the Kulaks as a result of the removal of state requisitioning. As a result, this policy restored some prosperity and improved the economic position of the peasants by encouraging new small businesses. Experts were brought in to increase production in nationalised industries (coal, iron, steel & railways). However, although this policy was aimed at providing more grain to feed the towns, it did improve the economic position of the peasants by giving the people the chance to make money. However it is debateable as to whether it was only intended as a temporary measure to repair a severely damaged economy. There were problems that prevented the peasantry to benefit economically from the policy. The first problem was that the surplus grain produced by peasants couldn't be traded for industrial goods easily as industry did not grow as rapidly as agriculture had. This meant the peasants did not benefit as much as they could have with their increased supply of grain. ...read more.


http://www.marx2mao.org//Stalin/Index.html For similarities you could consider some of the following points: 1. the central control by the Tsars and by Stalin 2. the secret police under both regimes 3. terror 4. total control of the government over the economy 5. total control of the government over education 6. the adoration of the leaders by the people, giving them a godlike status 7. Both regimes relied on a large number of supporters in order to carry out the work of the leader. For differences, you might consider some of the following points: 1. different political doctrines 2. the way in which they achieved power 3. attempts by the two last Tsars to give the people some democracy was not matched by Stalin 4. the Tsarist regimes knew that they would have to move on if they were to keep people happy. Stalin was not interested in the people's happiness. He just wanted the power. 5. Industrialisation 6. Class structure 7. Different types of people in power. Not just the Tsars and Stalin but all the other people that helped maintain the regimes. For each of the points you wish to write about you need to make your comparison and then support it with some factual evidence. . Some historians argue that Stolypin and his "wager on the strong" was the last chance the Tsar had to help Russia develop into a democratic society, and to keep his throne. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    identified paragraphs".101 Very little technical assistance from developed country coffers has been forthcoming since the Uruguay Round. It remains to be seen whether this will change substantially, even though the sums required are actually very modest and a drop in the ocean compared with overall aid transfers.

  2. 'Anarchy is what states make of it' (A Wendt) Do you agree?

    Realists believe that although more and more international institutions are bringing states closer and closer together, thus lessening the need to search for power as alliances are formed, this globalization of states will never eclipse the true nation state, and nationalism will always remain a powerful force behind world politics.

  1. Outline the debate about whether 'export-led growth' is better or worse than 'import substituting ...

    percentage of manufactured exports between 1963 and 1985, that outward-orientation had markedly better performance9. As mentioned above, each one reflects prevailing ideologies of its time; import substitution industrialisation was followed by many countries, especially in Latin America, from the 1930's onwards, and came about as a result of the effects

  2. International economic relations

    that provides a nation with that sum of money required for carrying its trade. Cantillon Cantillon deflated mercantilist tenets by showing that if a country continues to sell more than it buys from abroad, money will successively will flow into it and, as a first consequence, land and labor in the export-surplus country will become more expensive.

  1. Who benefited from Alexander II's Reforms?

    However, the nobility still got redemption payments and it is calculated that between 1863 and 1872 they received 607 million roubles of compensation from the government and much of this was invested in industry, which can only have contributed to the industrial boom of the 1870s, benefiting the entire Russian population.

  2. In this report, we shall explore the reasons for the shift from multilateralism to ...

    After the financial crisis, East Asian countries want to reduce the risk of financial contagion and exchange rate instability and also to increase their export growths. However the failure of WTO and little accomplishment of APEC and RTA make it difficult for East Asia to increase its trade, hence explaining its shift from multilateralism to bilateralism after the financial crisis.

  1. uk trading position report

    in the early '90s may indicate the beginning of the growth of developing countries. Imports and exports of services has had a gradual increase up to 1985, but not as dramatic as goods, and then peaked further in the late '90s.

  2. Chinese Economic Reform

    To a great extent, the issue of economic reform became politicized as the issue was used as a means by Deng Xiaoping to attain the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party. Mao's successor, Hua Guofeng, had "tried to prove himself a worthy successor to Mao by draping himself in the mantle of Maoist tradition.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work