• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important was the opposition of other countries in bringing apartheid in South Africa to an end?

Extracts from this document...


How important was the opposition of other countries in bringing apartheid in South Africa to an end? There were many ways in which the opposition of other countries helped bring apartheid to an end. I think that the most important way in which the opposition of other countries helped bring apartheid to an end was by imposing economic sanctions on South Africa. In the 1960's most Western companies had avoided criticising the Nationalists as they were making good profit under apartheid and they also knew that South Africa could easily ignore any opposition due to it's economic strength. The reason why there was a change of attitude during the 1970's is because business leaders began realising that apartheid laws were getting out of hand and were also getting in the way of economic progress. Many famous foreign companies in South Africa (for example Tate sugar) were also internationally criticised because they were not paying their black workers the decent wages which kept them out of real poverty. Business leaders all round the world therefore tried to improve the working conditions for the blacks working in their South African factories. For example, many American companies (e.g. General Motors) agreed to the 'Sullivan Principles' which guaranteed equal pay for equal work, no segregation and better training for blacks. However, for many critics of apartheid, things like the 'Sullivan Principles' were not enough. ...read more.


By 1980, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Angola, Malawi and Zambia had all become independent and were now unfriendly with South Africa. This posed a great threat on South Africa because these countries were no longer in an economic 'strangle hold' to South Africa and therefore if they disagreed with any of South Africa's policies, they did not have to think twice before opposing it. Also, the goods which South Africa supplied to the rest of the world could instead produced by the neighbouring countries of South Africa which were now independent. This is because they also had access to the 'riches of South Africa' such as gold, diamond, valuable minerals etc. This meant that during the economic sanctions, the international countries still got most of the products which they usually would have received from South Africa and therefore had no reason to end the economic sanctions. Also, neighbouring countries of South Africa would make a lot of money from the trading they did with international countries, therefore making them able to spend money on armed forces, consequently making them stronger and more secure. The independence of neighbouring countries to South Africa was always going to happen and I don't think that it had a very significant part in bringing apartheid to an end. It just made South Africa more paranoid which consequently convinced Prime Minister De Klark to it end apartheid in a fear of a war or something similar! ...read more.


Because of the riots, there were therefore many devastating photos of deaths, destruction etc taken by black photographers. When broadcast round the world, these shocking photos convinced even more people outside South Africa that apartheid should end because in the photos, they saw the misery and pain apartheid caused the blacks. I therefore think that the forcefulness and riots caused by the black people themselves was a very significant cause of the fall of apartheid. This is because without these photos and without any shocking incidents, the rest of the world would never have even known about the black suffering! In 1989, De Klark replaced P.W. Botha as Prime Minister. He greatly influenced the fall of apartheid because he brought new reforms into South Africa which legalised the ANC, the OAC, and the SACP. Hundreds of political prisoners including Mandela were released and announced that he wanted to create a new constitution which would give all equal rights to every South African. An obvious reason for these new reforms was economic pressure which De Klark probably realised would get worse if apartheid was not ended. Without the release of political prisoners, Mandela would also never have been able persuade De Klerk to release the ANC leaders. Without the ANC leaders, Mandela would never have been able to become president and free South Africa of apartheid. In my opinion, I think that the pressure the people within South Africa imposed on the government was just as effective as the pressure imposed by other countries. Both pressures were long term because...... ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Was the role of Nelson Mandela the most important factor in ending Apartheid in ...

    Archbishop Desmond Tutu spoke out against injustice all his life. He became an Anglican priest in 1961. In 1984 he won the Nobel Peace Prize for work against Apartheid. F. W. Klerk was a major force in ending Apartheid in that he released Mandela and cancelled Apartheid laws.

  2. European background to the scramble for Africa (1850 to 1900)

    important market for European goods, they traders needed to find new legitimate commerce. (Covered in Topic 1) * The traders had stayed on the coastline for the first half of the 1800s, the wanted to go inland to find the suppliers in the interior but knew nothing of trade routes

  1. In what ways is the government attempting to increase the willingness to wor

    This has in turn increased willingness to work as unemployment benefits have been cut and the labour market has become more competitive. Social Benefits In recent years the government has altered the benefit system. One being a reduction in the value of unemployment benefits compared with average wages of people to work.

  2. 'Globalisation should not be resisted.' What do you think?

    A worker in an MNC factory in a Third-World country may not get as much pay as his counterparts in the West. This is arguably bad in the sense that these people are exploited for money, but the main issue is this: job opportunities are available.

  1. Examine the effectiveness of economic sanctions as a tool of statecraft.

    The U.S under president Reagan imposed economic sanctions on Libya to show their leader Colonel Qaddafi and the rest of the world that America would not tolerate states that supported international terrorism. Libya was the target because it was believed that Quaddafi was providing the terrorists responsible for the Panam flight bombing with a safe haven.

  2. Is there a trade-off between prosperity and violence? If so, what is it? If ...

    farming practices rather than potentially more profitable courses of action which would yield greater profit (2001, pg 38-39). Though this conservatism (primarily in crop choice) represents 'self-insurance' against risk, this behaviour places a restriction on how much wealth they can produce since low yield crops plus population growth equals less return (Bates, 2001, pg.

  1. Rising manifestations of inequality in the South African context and the effects of globalisation.

    Thus, South Africa has to some extent experienced an erosion of its independent policy-making capacity and has had to adopt policies made by other entities, which may be viewed as negative or detrimental in certain cases. "...it is the persisting crisis of under-development in the South, of a South that

  2. What are the obstacles and opportunities faced by either South Africa or Mozambique in ...

    Before this coup the pan Lusitanian community were based on Lisbon and its governmental control and policies. The regime led to fascist policies and principles. Plantations were developed but were only maintainable through forced labour. This forced labour meant that demand increased and there need to be an increase in

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work