• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Identify the causes of unemployment and suggest suitable remedies

Extracts from this document...


Unemployment 1. There are two main methods of measuring unemployment in the UK: a) the claimant count b) the labour force survey a) This method was used for the whole of the 1980s and most of the 1990s. It simply involves taking a count of the number of people unemployed and claiming benefit. These are: the Jobseeker's Allowance (JSA) and National Insurance credits, claimed at Employment Service local offices. People claiming JSA (formerly Unemployment Benefit) must declare that they are out of work, capable of, available for and actively seeking work during the week in which the claim is made. They enter into a Jobseeker's agreement agreeing to take action to find work and to improve their prospects of finding employment. However, this method has many imperfections and so the incoming Labour government in 1997 changed to the second method of calculating unemployment. This measure has been seen as inaccurate because it omits many people who are unemployed but are not actually claiming benefit. There have been thirty changes to the way in which this measure is counted over the last twenty years. For example: in the late 80s, it was decided that those aged between 16-17years old should not count, because they could either stay in education or engage in government training. Also, more recently, it was decided that one could only claim Jobseekers Allowance for six months, rather than twelve. Many unemployed women do not collect Jobseekers Allowance; because they then cannot claim other important benefits. Figures are seasonably adjusted to allow for changes in unemployment that can occur naturally over the year. There tends to be seasonal employment in the summer at tourist resorts and at Christmas. Unemployment is commonly supplied as a percentage, because this takes into account changes in demographics. As one can imagine, an arbitrary figure of 2 million unemployed in a country means very little - the population could be 50M, which means that unemployment is low, or the population could be 20M, where it is very high. ...read more.


A major factor will be the point to which new technology increases the productivity of capital involved relative to the improved labour productivity. If all the reduction in costs is down to a new 'super machine', then the amount of labour required will probably fall. One final cause of unemployment is permutations of the workforce. It is constituted by people who are of working age and not currently in full-time education. Their number will change as demographic (age) structures (of the population) change. For example, a baby-boom (a rapid increase in the birth rate) will mean that these people will only join the workforce between 16 and 21 years later. If there are the same number of people retiring from the work-force, then unemployment will stay constant. However, following a baby boom there are often more joining the work-force than leaving. This would increase unemployment, unless there are sufficient jobs created to employ the extra people in the work-force. This was one of the causes of unemployment in the early 1980s when people born in the baby-boom of the 1960s joined the work-force. Links with aggregate demand and supply analysis: The first diagram shows the 'long run' Aggregate Supply/Aggregate Demand diagram. It is assumed that the economy is at equilibrium (full employment), YFE, providing a price level of P1 (pt. A). In the full employment level of income, any increase in aggregate demand will lead only to a rise in the price level in the long run. The economy will move to point B temporarily, but the subsequent rise in real wage claims that follow a rise in the price level will shift the short run aggregate supply curve to the left (from SRAS1 to SRAS2) and the economy will end up at point C, back at YFE but with a much higher price level (P2). The second diagram: it is assumed that the economy is operating at point A, with unemployment equivalent to NAIRU, U*, and 0% inflation. ...read more.


and thus creating jobs. This leads to the same consequences as (a): more jobs are created, but less money is saved despite higher confidence, which is linked to mortgages. As mentioned before, in order to achieve full employment, the government would have to implement a perfect market. Perfect competition, however, is very difficult to forge and therefore, so is full employment. Another factor related to this is the thriving technological boom that we are currently living in and will continue to do so. Throughout the all-encompassing industry of technology, the aim is to make jobs easier and/or automated. Automation inevitably leads to a machine doing the equivalent work of several employees with more precision and lower costs. The main point here is this: more and more technology is being developed in every industry, and eventually (and progressively), it may replace human labour, thus causing more unemployment. However, as mentioned before, this forced unemployment can be offset if they are employed in another sector, possibly in the maintenance of the new technology(ies) that made them obsolete in the first place. The disadvantage here is that not many technicians are needed, and, if a company 'lays off' 10,000 workers and replaces them with 25 machines, only, say, 3 technicians per machine may be needed and so 9925 workers will still be unemployed. There is a natural rate of unemployment around which the unemployment rate hovers. The government can change the rate to below or above this level, but it will return to the natural rate of unemployment. Therefore, 0% unemployment, even if possible, would be temporary. A ramification of this is that the long run Phillips curve is vertical. Success would lie in reducing this natural state of unemployment, and this can only be done by increasing the growth rate of the economy, which is a difficult task.. In conclusion, I do not believe that the government can achieve full employment, but the matter is highly subjective, as all the different classes of economists have proven. ?? ?? ?? ?? ANKIT MATHUR ECONOMICS HOMEWORK 25-02-02 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Macroeconomics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Macroeconomics essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Economic and Social consequences of Unemployment

    5 star(s)

    Even if one wanted to move to a different area to work, it was not possible as there was no accommodation available. Another problem of prolonged unemployment is hysteresis. Hysteresis occurs when the unemployed remains out of work for a long period to lose the skills and the motivation which are necessary for regaining employment.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Use the aggregate supply-aggregate demand (AS-AD) model to examine the effects on real GDP ...

    4 star(s)

    of both labour and capital" � "changes in unit wage costs (wage costs per unit of output)"

  1. Budget 2004-05 and Economic Analysis of Pakistan

    were of a sum of Rs.33.1 billion and by end March 2004, Pakistan had received gross proceeds of Rs.134.4 billion. Fiscal & Monetary * Budget deficit contained at 4% of GDP. * Debt servicing has been brought down. * Fiscal reforms continue.

  2. Inflation vs. Unemployment - In what way might there be a trade off ...

    choose to remain unemployed More money 'on the dole' than from working Remove the low-paid from the liability to pay income tax The table suggests possible solution to the unemployment. Unemployment brings along a cost. The opportunity cost of each unemployed person is what they could have contributed to the economy.

  1. Indian Economics

    Average headline world price of Indian basket of crude petroleum increased by 44.5%, from US$37.3 per barrel in April-November 2004 to US$53.9 per barrel in April-November 2005, and was US$58.10 per barrel on February 13, 2005. In India , inflation, measured by a point-to-point increase in the Wholesale Price Index (WPI)

  2. How have the Rates of Inflation in the UK Changed Since the Monetary Policy ...

    After that it follows what the theory would suggest. What was happening at the beginning of 1999 and the information that has been shown in graph 1 and graph 3 definitely suggest that it is not just the MPC that is affecting the inflation levels and helping to have kept the price stability from 1993.

  1. Comparing the effects of immigration on GDP in Malaysia, Japan and South Africa.

    Japan also calls for expansion of immigration control personnel. This changes the number of immigrants in the Japan. 6.1.3 Government Immigration Policies Many of the Japan rural regions have the problems of shortages of workers and taxpayers. It is difficult to see how an ever-shrinking workforce will generate the productivity and growth needed to resolve these problems.

  2. Why does smoking lead to an external cost?

    is a percentage of the price of the product or a fixed rate tax, and finally other government legislations are forms of protectionism B) Discuss whether protectionist policies will always produce benefits to an economy Protectionism is the economic policy of restraining trade between countries.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work