• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In arguments concerning globalisation, controversy is quite evident - Discuss the positive and negative outcomes connected with this issue.

Extracts from this document...


Neville Borg Sociology A-level In arguments concerning globalisation, controversy is quite evident. Discuss the positive and negative outcomes connected with this issue. In today's life we often encounter terms such as "living in a global village" and "we all live in the same world". Even simply switching on the television brings us face to face with events occurring on the other side of the globe. News broadcasts transmit not only the local news or the latest political propaganda being fed to the people, but also incidents taking place all over Europe, Asia, the Americas and even Africa. We all witness this everyday, yet we rarely stop to truly think of the implications. What is the significance of virtually being a spectator in events across the world? What difference does this make to an individual? More importantly, what changes does this bring upon a society? Many people consider globalisation a recent, modern phenomenon and associate it with today's highly technological age. After all, the world must be globalized if humanity is capable of breaching the frontier and sending man into space. However, the truth is that globalisation had much more humble beginnings. ...read more.


By stating this, the sceptics admit that nowadays there is more interaction and communication between countries than ever before. Sceptics also criticize economy because they believe that it is not truly globalise. They try to prove this by arguing that certain countries are much more developed than others, and if the world were truly globalise countries would be equal. Sceptics are criticized fiercely for what seems to be an old-fashioned and ethnocentric approach. An argument placed against them says that simply because some countries are not yet part of it, it doesn't mean that globalisation doesn't exist. They are also accused of discouraging globalisation because they fear that it will make people more interactive and interdependent, thus forcing their governments to share their power and money with others. On the flip side of the coin, one can find the Hyperglobalizers. These believe that the world is one and globalisation covers the whole world and is a very real phenomenon that is felt almost everywhere. This process does not respect national borders or ideas of sovereignty. Hyperglobalizers base their arguments on aspects of commerce, trade and production. Kenichi Ohmae, a Japanese hyperglobalizer, stated that globalisation leads to a "borderless world". ...read more.


However, help must not simply be acts of charity, where money is given to their governments, but more practical help at the root of the problem. There are other NGO's discouraging globalisation, such as the Campaign for Global Justice, who see it as a completely negative process. These try to inform people that it must be slowed and, if possible, stopped. An argument brought up concerns the aspect of free trade. Whilst some people say that it solves problems of poverty and inequality, they state that this only flows in one direction - the rich produce and the poor consume, thus forcing them to depend on rich countries. If it were truly free trade both would produce and consume, thus creating an equal situation. Globalisation involves certain risks, such as environmental degradation due to development, shifting employment patterns leading to stress and anxiety, heightened job insecurity and de-skilling (such as the infamous 7-Up case in Malta last year), decline in traditional influences and loss of self-identity, erosion of family patterns, and democratization of personal relationships. These are all problems one must consider when trying to evaluate the impact of globalisation, especially in light of the forthcoming referendum on whether Malta is to enter the EU or not. This is a subjective argument, however one cannot deny that without globalisation, the world would not be the same. 5 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. The positive and negative effects of Globalization

    For many cultures the new diversity that globalization brings is disquieting and disempowering. People fear that their countries are becoming fragmented and that traditional values and cultural identities are being lost. There are many driving forces which help spread Americanization but the main contributing factors are the huge multi national corporations.

  2. Corruption and Globalisation - Both of them have been so pervasive in recent years. ...

    the reverse effect is much more serious, if corruption is a common problem in a country, other companies won't consider entry to the country, therefore the competition within a country reduced, and vice-versa, if a company has the reputation of corruption, it will be hard for the company to do businesses anywhere in the world.

  1. Free essay

    Globalisation and changing career patterns

    In its simplest sense, globalisation refers to the 'widening, deepening, and speeding up of global interconnectedness' (Held et al, 1999, pg 16). This basically refers to the fact that communication (the interconnections) is now on a wider scale, and is almost instantaneous.

  2. International Trade - I have been asked to investigate the possibility of a company ...

    The research will range from Mintel reports to questionnaires. All this will help David Lloyd's realise what facilities and prices Chinese people are willing to pay for memberships at Lloyd's. This will give the company framework on which to build as David Lloyds has gathered information which is relative to them opening up a gym in China.

  1. Advantages and diasadvantages of joining the Euro

    Eventually the EU will seek to take control of the euro zone taxation policy. This will limit the ability of the UK to respond to its particular economic situation.

  2. To what extent has globalisation created a 'borderless world'?

    The overall number of poor people has at last stopped increasing, falling, in fact, by an estimated 200 million. Life expectancy and schooling are rising in the new globalisers to levels close to those in rich countries in the 1960s.

  1. Examine and evaluate the arguments for and against the growth of globalisation.

    However, there is no vocabulary of 'globalisation' was needed to national relations' arguably remains quite sufficient to examine contemporary cross-border transactions and interlinkages. We should reserve the new word to designate something different. 2. In these cases a global world is one without regulatory barriers to transfers of resources of between countries.

  2. Globalization is undoubtedly not a single phenomenon.

    According to some estimates, the industrialized countries, which make up 20 per cent of the GATT membership, will gain 70 per cent of the additional income arising from the implementation of the Uruguay Round of GATT (Globalize.org). Traditionally politics has been undertaken within national political systems.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work