• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In arguments concerning globalisation, controversy is quite evident - Discuss the positive and negative outcomes connected with this issue.

Extracts from this document...


Neville Borg Sociology A-level In arguments concerning globalisation, controversy is quite evident. Discuss the positive and negative outcomes connected with this issue. In today's life we often encounter terms such as "living in a global village" and "we all live in the same world". Even simply switching on the television brings us face to face with events occurring on the other side of the globe. News broadcasts transmit not only the local news or the latest political propaganda being fed to the people, but also incidents taking place all over Europe, Asia, the Americas and even Africa. We all witness this everyday, yet we rarely stop to truly think of the implications. What is the significance of virtually being a spectator in events across the world? What difference does this make to an individual? More importantly, what changes does this bring upon a society? Many people consider globalisation a recent, modern phenomenon and associate it with today's highly technological age. After all, the world must be globalized if humanity is capable of breaching the frontier and sending man into space. However, the truth is that globalisation had much more humble beginnings. ...read more.


By stating this, the sceptics admit that nowadays there is more interaction and communication between countries than ever before. Sceptics also criticize economy because they believe that it is not truly globalise. They try to prove this by arguing that certain countries are much more developed than others, and if the world were truly globalise countries would be equal. Sceptics are criticized fiercely for what seems to be an old-fashioned and ethnocentric approach. An argument placed against them says that simply because some countries are not yet part of it, it doesn't mean that globalisation doesn't exist. They are also accused of discouraging globalisation because they fear that it will make people more interactive and interdependent, thus forcing their governments to share their power and money with others. On the flip side of the coin, one can find the Hyperglobalizers. These believe that the world is one and globalisation covers the whole world and is a very real phenomenon that is felt almost everywhere. This process does not respect national borders or ideas of sovereignty. Hyperglobalizers base their arguments on aspects of commerce, trade and production. Kenichi Ohmae, a Japanese hyperglobalizer, stated that globalisation leads to a "borderless world". ...read more.


However, help must not simply be acts of charity, where money is given to their governments, but more practical help at the root of the problem. There are other NGO's discouraging globalisation, such as the Campaign for Global Justice, who see it as a completely negative process. These try to inform people that it must be slowed and, if possible, stopped. An argument brought up concerns the aspect of free trade. Whilst some people say that it solves problems of poverty and inequality, they state that this only flows in one direction - the rich produce and the poor consume, thus forcing them to depend on rich countries. If it were truly free trade both would produce and consume, thus creating an equal situation. Globalisation involves certain risks, such as environmental degradation due to development, shifting employment patterns leading to stress and anxiety, heightened job insecurity and de-skilling (such as the infamous 7-Up case in Malta last year), decline in traditional influences and loss of self-identity, erosion of family patterns, and democratization of personal relationships. These are all problems one must consider when trying to evaluate the impact of globalisation, especially in light of the forthcoming referendum on whether Malta is to enter the EU or not. This is a subjective argument, however one cannot deny that without globalisation, the world would not be the same. 5 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. The Impact of Globalisation upon the Japanese Economy

    TNCs are now changing their payment systems to more performance based bonuses and wages. For example Toshiba are one of the first companies in Japan to introduce a western style of payments into a few of its branches. The role of the government has impacted the labour market of Japan.

  2. The positive and negative effects of Globalization

    The countries which lack this political power and stability are those which do not reap the benefits or on the contrary are exploited by the MNC's. Institutions such as the World Bank, World Trade Organization (WTO) and International Monetary Fund (IMF)

  1. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    "the effect of environmental measures on market access, especially in relation to developing countries, in particular the least developed among them, and those situations in which the elimination or reduction of trade restrictions and distortions would benefit trade, the environment and development"; 2)

  2. Advantages and diasadvantages of joining the Euro

    Trade The UK has stronger trade links outside of Europe, especially with the US most of which is in dollars. We are also the biggest European investor in the US and they invest twice as much in the UK as the rest of Europe combined.

  1. Free essay

    Globalisation and changing career patterns

    The service sector has followed suit in recent times, with many basic functions offshored. The boom time of globalisation is regularly referred to as 1950-2000, but the period of 1850-1914 saw an increase in the flow of merchandise trade, capital investment and labour migration all of which were comparable to today's figures (Hirst and Thompson, 1999).

  2. Globalization is undoubtedly not a single phenomenon.

    Traditionally politics has been undertaken within national political systems. National governments have been ultimately responsible for maintaining the security and economic welfare of their citizens, as well as the protection of human rights and the environment within their borders. With global ecological changes, an ever more integrated global economy, and other global trends, political activity increasingly takes place at the global level.

  1. To what extent has globalisation created a 'borderless world'?

    This will tend to make use of the business' competitive advantage by locating production wherever it is most efficient. Businesses are increasingly merging or joining with others, often in other countries, in order to better provide its goods or services to a global market.

  2. Consider the Impact of Globalisation on Wales

    per cent and airfreight falling on average three per cent every year. It's no wonder international trade has become one of the most striking features of globalisation. Now for many countries, it is cheaper to import the required goods than to produce them themselves and also cheaper to set up companies abroad for lower wages and larger outputs.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work