• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In economics we refer to these two acts as tax evasion and tax avoidance. The former being illegal while the latter legal.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Taxation refers to the 'compulsory transfer of funds from individuals and businesses to the government1'. These transfers can be levied on many things. Some examples are on, oil, tobacco, alcohol, petroleum or inheritance. One of the functions of the government is to find a good taxation system in order to earn revenue, which is used to fund public expenditure. Taxes throughout the ages, in their various forms were been regarded as an evil. This brought people to find ways and means in order to avoid the burden of taxes or at least pay the least possible. In economics we refer to these two acts as tax evasion and tax avoidance. The former being illegal while the latter legal. This is defined as the failure to pay taxes legally2. An example of tax evasion is the smuggling of drugs or tobacco. Tax avoidance is defined as arranging one's affair so that tax is not legally payable3. This is a tool which government uses having in mind a particular scope. This could be done to encourage the declaration of assets in the attempt to collect more revenue. When government permits tax avoidance and evasion occurring, it looses revenue. This happens since people would generally like to regularize their position especially if their consideration of the burden of taxation is just. However in other circumstances government does not lose any revenue. This takes place mainly when tax shifting occurs. In fact when this phenomenon occurs the tax is just passed to another group of people. However if we consider just the entries governments receives these would not vary. Another instance when the government does not lose revenue is when capitalization occurs. If we consider two bonds, bond A and B. Both of which provide the same annual income. If a tax rate were imposed only on bond A, the owner would suffer a loss in value. ...read more.

Middle

Now that the sales tax is introduced they would ask for LM 5(point B). This is done so that the sellers would not be influenced by the tax that they are now required by law, to give to the state. Any point on S2 will be LM 1 greater than the equivalent point on S1. We can see from the diagram that the equilibrium has moved from E1 to E2. Price moves upwards from Lm 3 to Lm 3.20. In this case buyers burden is limited to 20 cents of the burden while sellers would have to pay the remaining 80 cents left imposed by the state. We should not forget that the entire Lm 1 goes to the state. This means that the seller would receive LM 2.20. It is clear that in the diagram buyers bear a lighter share of the burden. This takes place because of the responsiveness of consumers to changes in prices. In economics we refer to this phenomenon as elasticity, In fact in this case we can say that demand is more elastic than supply. This could mean that the good we took into consideration is not a necessity good and therefore not inelastic. A small change in price will affect the demand of the consumers. This will hinder producer to pass or shift the burden of the sales tax to the public. If we look at the following diagram the opposite takes place. As we see here the supply is more elastic than demand. Hence, this means that the sellers are more responsive to changes in price. In this case the sellers bear a lighter burden than before. This diagram once more reproduces the demand and supply of people for a particular good. As we see from the diagram the equilibrium moves from E1 to E2. In this case as the arrows show that the consumer bear the 80 cents increase in tax whilst the producer just the 20 cents. ...read more.

Conclusion

Till now we have examined situations where, the imperfections of the market suppliers manages to push forward to consumers the burden of tax. Another possibility could arise. This is when the burden is passed "backward" to the wage earner through the reduction in the wage rate. Many times we find situations where the labour market is weak and it finds itself faced with a monopsonistic employers. In this situation the wage rate may be set below the value of labour's marginal product. In this situation we find that employers are not obliged to exploit their position before the introduction of the tax. However with this introduction, employers could utilize their market powers more fully. The end result would be the tax burden being passed to the labour. When labour is in a strong position a similar situation may result. In this case wage rates are set in collective agreements. It could be that unions when agreeing on wages may allow for the profitability of the firm. The aim of the union could be to bring some of the profits of the firm to wage earners and leave the firm with what is considered to be reasonable profits. Since this depends on corporate profits after tax, an increase in the profits may bring a reduction in wage demands. Once more, part of the increase in tax may again be passed backward to the wage earner. To sum up, it is clear that tax shifting and tax incidence of a tax varies greatly, just by changing the context of the tax. Each and every tax has its own characteristics. According to these characteristics, taxation 'attacks' different categories of people. Finally we have to say that tax shifting is one of the characteristics of taxes in general. Whenever a tax is introduced people will try to shift its burden to someone else. This will bring the burden of taxes to different categories of people. It is thus important for the government to review taxation on a regular basis to assess if the intended fairness of a particular tax is still present. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy essays

  1. what is economics

    * If we take another look at the 'holidays in Ibiza' market demand curve, we can see at a price of �300, 1000 holidays will be demanded * Total expenditure by those consumers is (300 x 1000) = 300,000 * If the price rises to �325, then 900 holidays are

  2. Micro economics environment - Government intervention

    The market share test- that as a result of the merger 25 per cent or more of the supply or purchase of goods or service of a particular description in the uk or a substantial part of its comes under the control of the merger enterprise, or a 25 per cent share increase.

  1. In this essay, I would like to take a view at the implications for ...

    A very significant feature of a monopoly is that there must be very strong barriers to block the entry of new firms. Barriers can be various. If the monopolist's costs go on falling significantly up to the output that satisfies the whole market, the industry may not be able to

  2. This essay compares examples of real world economics found in three studies written in ...

    However, the findings of Thomas von Ungern-Sternberg4, Stefan Felder5, Karl Epple and Reinhard Sch�fer6, respectively, claim that moving out of a state-controlled monopolistic situation, to one of imperfect, and thus realistic non-assumptive competition (which necessarily include non-state controlled/financed actors) we find a detrimental effect on the prices paid by the consumers of these services.

  1. 'Although corporate pricing decisions are influenced by many different factors, fundamentally prices will reflect ...

    The cost structure of a firm is illustrated in figure 1.1 bellow. Costs are measured on the vertical axis and level of the firm's output on the horizontal axis. Fixed costs have to be paid regardless of the level of sales and are depicted by a straight horizontal line.

  2. Economics - Monopolists

    An example of control over a raw material is the Aluminium Company of America. This company controlled the world's bauxite before the Second World War. Bauxite is an essential material in the production of aluminium. If the monopolist owns the resources required to produce a good then it is possible

  1. What Are The Effects Of Tescos Oligopolistic Market Structure, On Both Consumers And Producers?

    The fate (or the pay-off) of a player in a game depends not only on the actions of that player but also on the other players. The game theory is mainly concerned with predicting the outcome of games of strategy in which the participants (for example two or more businesses competing in a market)

  2. The tobacco industry maintains that cigarette advertising does not increase the incidence of smoking. ...

    Firms can increase its profits if it convinces consumers their brand of product is superior. They played around with the idea of secret ingredients or chemicals that were unique and developed in world-class laboratories, providing information to the consumers of the clear benefits of consuming their products.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work