• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

income distribution

Extracts from this document...


Explain Why the Distribution of Income is Unequal in the UK. Income is a flow of earnings generated and received over a given time period. It can be gained from employment, pension funds or ownership of wealth. Between 1979 and 1990, the UK economy experienced a marked increase in income inequality. However, since 1997 when labour came into power, their social reforms such as tax credits and national minimum wage has narrowed that gap slightly. Although the gap still exists from a series of factors. A rise in earnings inequality can cause income inequality. ...read more.


Over the years there has also been a rise in workless households where there is no income earner and are thus living off welfare benefits. Unemployment of unskilled and semi-skilled labour and generally being unemployable has caused this. Another reason is due to the benefit culture where the income into the household would be less if they worked than if they lived off benefits, due to taxes etc, therefore, it is more beneficial for them to stay on benefits. Health issues such as drug and alcohol abuse is also another factor contributing to this. ...read more.


Direct taxes are progressive (a higher proportion is paid as income rises, which is thought to be fair) and indirect taxes are regressive (a higher proportion is paid as income falls). Therefore when Thatcher raised VAT which is an indirect tax, this contributed further to the widened gap of income distribution. Therefore, I believe that the most significant cause of income inequality was the change in the UK tax structure in 1979, as this has affected everyone in the UK and thus contributed greatly to income inequality. However this inequality will always exist as it is an incentive to work and earn more. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

This essay engages at an okay level, as it picks up on some of the key points, but doesn't elaborate and analyse enough. For example, it discusses how a rise in earnings inequality causes inequality. This is quite obvious, so ...

Read full review

Response to the question

This essay engages at an okay level, as it picks up on some of the key points, but doesn't elaborate and analyse enough. For example, it discusses how a rise in earnings inequality causes inequality. This is quite obvious, so I would've liked to have seen some analysis of wage determination theories. For example, this would be a great opportunity to explore MRP (marginal revenue product) and discuss that higher-skilled jobs have higher MRP due to integrated training with their jobs, and so their income has increased more than low-skilled jobs where this is absent. Elaborations like this would drive this essay to higher marks.

Level of analysis

The analysis in this essay has potential. I liked how they made clear that income is a flow of money, as this is often not explained in essays when it is an easy way to pick up marks! Not to be confused with wealth which is a stock of money. It is able to pick up on the main points: unemployment, low-skilled jobs and regressive taxes. However, these points are not clinically analysed. As mentioned above, the discussion of people having high-skilled jobs and other having low-skilled jobs could be detailed with an MRP diagram. I did like the context used when discussing that benefits follow inflation, but wages tend to increase by more than inflation. However, this could be elaborated upon, saying that although this is the case, benefits are much lower than employment earnings in general. A discussion of hysteresis and long term unemployment would be useful here, saying that households struggle to get back into work once out of a job for a long period. I did like the social argument revolving around unemployment, as this shows good awareness beyond economics. When talking about inequality, it is vital to discuss the Lorenz curve and Gini coefficient. This essay draws upon changes made by Thatcher, so it would be useful to explore whether these changes increase inequality, which could be done through an analysis of the changes in the Gini coefficient. There is some evaluation in the conclusion, saying that inequality causes incentives. I think this is an interesting concept, and would question whether it's the other way round. Incentives to become entrepreneurs mean that income isn't distributed evenly through the capitalist system, thus causing inequality. Mankind don't have the same human capital, so there is inequality wherever you look.

Quality of writing

The essay has a clear structure, with an introduction and conclusion. I would've liked to have seen a stronger introduction, as "the gap still exists" hasn't been properly explained and only asserted. I would be questioning "what gap?" whereas it would only take a sentence to explain the inequality. The conclusion includes the first person, which I advise strongly against. This is because it suggests that your argument is opinion based using phrases such as "I think". It is much more sophisticated to say "it is clear that" or "the evidence suggests" to show that an argument is built upon clear analysis. Other than that, spelling, punctuation and grammar are strong.

Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by groat 02/03/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Supermarkets in UK - An oligopily

    5 star(s)

    Implications for Tesco are many. Supplier power is wielded by suppliers demanding that retailers pay a certain price for their goods. If retailers don't pay the price, they don't get the goods to sell. But large supermarkets, like Tesco, have an overwhelming advantage over the small shopkeeper-they can dictate the price they pay the supplier.

  2. Discuss whether the privatisation of British Rail has been successful. Evaluate whether the new ...

    However, perhaps we can expect more from privatised companies. As for the future structure of British Rail, the transport minister, Stephen Byers plan to regionalize part of the rail network is entirely feasible and could well redeem his reputation. Few ministers have inherited policy disasters on such a scale: Railtrack,

  1. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of the Dutch and English East india Companies as ...

    involved in local politics in the first place, the administration system that resulted was much simpler, conforming to the principle that it should 'rather trade than govern'. The Companies had fewer staff and thus lower administration costs. The fact that officials recruited back from home 'entered for life' also meant that there was little change of personnel.

  2. How effective were the liberal reforms between 1900 and 1914.

    These checks were extended to medical care in 1912. The liberals also banned the insuring of a child's life. Before the reforms old people had to rely on their families or charity to avoid the workhouse or total poverty.

  1. Explain three reasons why labour markets may be imperfectly competitive

    lower for cashiers compared to accountants, their wages would also be lower too. However, when making the assumption that wage rates causes changes in supply and demand of labour, we are excluding jobs that are not desirable such as dustbin collectors which earn £15,000 more than certain hospital workers from statistical 2 years ago.

  2. Technological Change and Markets & The Case For Public Ownership of Utility Companies.

    and producers if they are left in the private sector ? which is defined as the sector of the economy that is run and owned by private individuals. Unlike public ownership, they are not run by the state. On the other hand, utilities could be argued to be beneficial for

  1. What Are The Effects Of Tescos Oligopolistic Market Structure, On Both Consumers And Producers?

    Oligopolistic firms display forms of non-price competition because they have little to gain from price competition, so they rely on non-price methods of competing with other firms. Three methods that an oligopolistic firm may employ as a form of competition are: 1.

  2. Explain the causes of Absolute & Relative Poverty in the UK

    There are three main causes of relative poverty and one I will discuss in relation to absolute poverty.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work